Update Centos Stream 9 version to a stable version #924

Barakmor1 · 2022-12-08T14:20:51Z

Currently we have problem deploying the cni pods with the current centos 9 version:
https://prow.ci.kubevirt.io/view/gs/kubevirt-prow/pr-logs/pull/kubevirt_kubevirtci/914/check-provision-k8s-1.26/1600162586337218560
getting this error in the pod's status:
container create failed: time="2022-12-08T11:41:22Z" level=error msg="runc create failed: unable to start container process: error during container init: write /proc/self/attr/keycreate: invalid argument"
with this newer version the problem doesn't exist.
Signed-off-by: bmordeha [email protected]

Barakmor1 · 2022-12-08T14:21:59Z

/test check-provision-k8s-1.26

oshoval · 2022-12-08T14:24:45Z

Nice, do you have please a specific issue to link about it ?
Please update commit message itself with the error as well

jean-edouard · 2022-12-08T14:27:14Z

Is this the latest stable version? Where do we find those numbers online? Thank you!
Edit: looks like it matches CentOS-Stream-Container-Base-9 versions in https://cloud.centos.org/centos/9-stream/x86_64/images/
In that case, why don't we use 20221206.0?

Barakmor1 · 2022-12-08T14:32:47Z

Is this the latest stable version? Where do we find those numbers online? Thank you! Edit: looks like it matches CentOS-Stream-Container-Base-9 versions in https://cloud.centos.org/centos/9-stream/x86_64/images/ In that case, why don't we use 20221206.0?

Because it didn't work :\
this is the latest one that did work locally

cni's coredns and calico-kube-controllers getting: CreateContainerError with the following message: "runc create failed: unable to start container process: error during container init: write /proc/self/attr/keycreate: invalid argument" Signed-off-by: bmordeha <[email protected]>

jean-edouard · 2022-12-08T14:35:25Z

Is this the latest stable version? Where do we find those numbers online? Thank you! Edit: looks like it matches CentOS-Stream-Container-Base-9 versions in https://cloud.centos.org/centos/9-stream/x86_64/images/ In that case, why don't we use 20221206.0?

Because it didn't work :\ this is the latest one that did work locally

Can you please elaborate? If there a problem with 20221206.0 we should file an issue, because it's likely to persist in future versions!

Barakmor1 · 2022-12-08T14:42:12Z

Is this the latest stable version? Where do we find those numbers online? Thank you! Edit: looks like it matches CentOS-Stream-Container-Base-9 versions in https://cloud.centos.org/centos/9-stream/x86_64/images/ In that case, why don't we use 20221206.0?

Because it didn't work :\ this is the latest one that did work locally

Can you please elaborate? If there a problem with 20221206.0 we should file an issue, because it's likely to persist in future versions!

Yes ,
i got
Job for crio.service failed because the control process exited with error code. error
after running
systemctl enable --now crio

also tried the resolution in :
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/5009091
And it didn't work for me

jean-edouard · 2022-12-08T14:46:09Z

Is this the latest stable version? Where do we find those numbers online? Thank you! Edit: looks like it matches CentOS-Stream-Container-Base-9 versions in https://cloud.centos.org/centos/9-stream/x86_64/images/ In that case, why don't we use 20221206.0?

Because it didn't work :\ this is the latest one that did work locally

Can you please elaborate? If there a problem with 20221206.0 we should file an issue, because it's likely to persist in future versions!

Yes , i got Job for crio.service failed because the control process exited with error code. error after running systemctl enable --now crio

also tried the resolution in : https://access.redhat.com/solutions/5009091 And it didn't work for me

Ok, thank you, please file a Bugzilla issue for it.
/approve

kubevirt-bot · 2022-12-08T14:46:14Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jean-edouard

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~OWNERS~~ [jean-edouard]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Barakmor1 · 2022-12-08T14:48:12Z

/test check-provision-k8s-1.26

Barakmor1 · 2022-12-08T14:49:00Z

/hold
Let's wait for the lane to finish

oshoval · 2022-12-08T14:50:26Z

Please include in the BZ also the current version and the problem, because the fact it works might be just temporary until a new containerd or some RPM is released

oshoval · 2022-12-08T15:37:16Z

The problem this PR solves blocks publish
https://prow.ci.kubevirt.io/view/gs/kubevirt-prow/logs/publish-kubevirtci/1600820546306576384

/cc @brianmcarey FYI

If https://prow.ci.kubevirt.io/view/gs/kubevirt-prow/pr-logs/pull/kubevirt_kubevirtci/924/check-provision-k8s-1.26/1600864837548642304
passes we need it please :)

kubevirt-bot · 2022-12-08T15:37:19Z

@oshoval: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: FYI.

Note that only kubevirt members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

It blocks publish
https://prow.ci.kubevirt.io/view/gs/kubevirt-prow/logs/publish-kubevirtci/1600820546306576384

/cc @brianmcarey FYI

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

brianmcarey

/lgtm

brianmcarey · 2022-12-08T16:29:19Z

/override check-up-kind-1.23-vgpu

This lane looks to be broken and not related to this change.
#925

kubevirt-bot · 2022-12-08T16:29:22Z

@brianmcarey: Overrode contexts on behalf of brianmcarey: check-up-kind-1.23-vgpu

In response to this:

/override check-up-kind-1.23-vgpu

This lane looks to be broken and not related to this change.
#925

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

brianmcarey · 2022-12-08T19:52:33Z

/unhold

check-provision-k8s-1.26 passed - https://prow.ci.kubevirt.io/view/gs/kubevirt-prow/pr-logs/pull/kubevirt_kubevirtci/924/check-provision-k8s-1.26/1600864837548642304

[dc4fc70 Update Centos Stream 9 version to a stable version](kubevirt/kubevirtci#924) [e0ace8c Revert "bump, cnao: k8s-1.2[4,5] to cnao v0.82.0](https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirtci/pull/910)"](https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirtci/pull/920) [bc9b6d2 Remove the 1.22 kubevirtci provider](kubevirt/kubevirtci#922) [c1432fc k8s-1.26: Update cni ipv6 diff file](kubevirt/kubevirtci#914) [921f43c SR-IOV providers: Bump SR-IOV CNI to v2.7.0](kubevirt/kubevirtci#913) [4eb880c vm based providers: Add single stack k8s-1.25 ipv6 lane](kubevirt/kubevirtci#912) [d73b264 bump, cnao: k8s-1.2[4,5] to cnao v0.82.0](kubevirt/kubevirtci#910) ```release-note NONE ``` Signed-off-by: kubevirt-bot <[email protected]>

[dc4fc70 Update Centos Stream 9 version to a stable version](kubevirt/kubevirtci#924) [e0ace8c Revert "bump, cnao: k8s-1.2[4,5] to cnao v0.82.0](https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirtci/pull/910)"](https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirtci/pull/920) [bc9b6d2 Remove the 1.22 kubevirtci provider](kubevirt/kubevirtci#922) [c1432fc k8s-1.26: Update cni ipv6 diff file](kubevirt/kubevirtci#914) [921f43c SR-IOV providers: Bump SR-IOV CNI to v2.7.0](kubevirt/kubevirtci#913) [4eb880c vm based providers: Add single stack k8s-1.25 ipv6 lane](kubevirt/kubevirtci#912) [d73b264 bump, cnao: k8s-1.2[4,5] to cnao v0.82.0](kubevirt/kubevirtci#910) ```release-note NONE ``` Signed-off-by: kubevirt-bot <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: zhangzhangzf <[email protected]>

kubevirt-bot added the dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. label Dec 8, 2022

kubevirt-bot requested review from jean-edouard and phoracek December 8, 2022 14:20

kubevirt-bot added the size/XS label Dec 8, 2022

Barakmor1 mentioned this pull request Dec 8, 2022

k8s-1.26: Update cni ipv6 diff file #914

Merged

Barakmor1 force-pushed the update_centos9_version branch from e4d601f to 173ee40 Compare December 8, 2022 14:44

kubevirt-bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 8, 2022

kubevirt-bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 8, 2022

kubevirt-bot requested a review from brianmcarey December 8, 2022 15:37

brianmcarey reviewed Dec 8, 2022

View reviewed changes

kubevirt-bot assigned brianmcarey Dec 8, 2022

kubevirt-bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 8, 2022

kubevirt-bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 8, 2022

kubevirt-bot merged commit dc4fc70 into kubevirt:main Dec 8, 2022

kubevirt-bot mentioned this pull request Dec 9, 2022

Bump kubevirtci kubevirt/kubevirt#8864

Merged

Barakmor1 mentioned this pull request Dec 14, 2022

k8s, cluster-up: Copy istio CNI net conf to where Multus expects #932

Merged

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Update Centos Stream 9 version to a stable version #924

Update Centos Stream 9 version to a stable version #924

Barakmor1 commented Dec 8, 2022

Barakmor1 commented Dec 8, 2022

oshoval commented Dec 8, 2022 •

edited

Loading

jean-edouard commented Dec 8, 2022 •

edited

Loading

Barakmor1 commented Dec 8, 2022

jean-edouard commented Dec 8, 2022

Barakmor1 commented Dec 8, 2022

jean-edouard commented Dec 8, 2022

kubevirt-bot commented Dec 8, 2022

Barakmor1 commented Dec 8, 2022

Barakmor1 commented Dec 8, 2022

oshoval commented Dec 8, 2022

oshoval commented Dec 8, 2022 •

edited

Loading

kubevirt-bot commented Dec 8, 2022

brianmcarey left a comment

brianmcarey commented Dec 8, 2022

kubevirt-bot commented Dec 8, 2022

brianmcarey commented Dec 8, 2022

Update Centos Stream 9 version to a stable version #924

Update Centos Stream 9 version to a stable version #924

Conversation

Barakmor1 commented Dec 8, 2022

Barakmor1 commented Dec 8, 2022

oshoval commented Dec 8, 2022 • edited Loading

jean-edouard commented Dec 8, 2022 • edited Loading

Barakmor1 commented Dec 8, 2022

jean-edouard commented Dec 8, 2022

Barakmor1 commented Dec 8, 2022

jean-edouard commented Dec 8, 2022

kubevirt-bot commented Dec 8, 2022

Barakmor1 commented Dec 8, 2022

Barakmor1 commented Dec 8, 2022

oshoval commented Dec 8, 2022

oshoval commented Dec 8, 2022 • edited Loading

kubevirt-bot commented Dec 8, 2022

brianmcarey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

brianmcarey commented Dec 8, 2022

kubevirt-bot commented Dec 8, 2022

brianmcarey commented Dec 8, 2022

oshoval commented Dec 8, 2022 •

edited

Loading

jean-edouard commented Dec 8, 2022 •

edited

Loading

oshoval commented Dec 8, 2022 •

edited

Loading