Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

community: langkit dependency #21174

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 6, 2024

Conversation

leo-gan
Copy link
Collaborator

@leo-gan leo-gan commented May 2, 2024

Issue: the langkit package is not presented in the pyproject.toml but it is a requirement for the WhyLabsCallbackHandler
Change: added langkit

Copy link

vercel bot commented May 2, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

1 Ignored Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
langchain ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview May 6, 2024 6:05pm

@leo-gan leo-gan marked this pull request as ready for review May 2, 2024 00:34
@dosubot dosubot bot added size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. 🤖:nit Small modifications/deletions, fixes, deps or improvements to existing code or docs labels May 2, 2024
@leo-gan leo-gan requested a review from ccurme May 3, 2024 21:41
@dosubot dosubot bot added the lgtm PR looks good. Use to confirm that a PR is ready for merging. label May 6, 2024
@ccurme ccurme enabled auto-merge (squash) May 6, 2024 18:04
@ccurme ccurme merged commit 6feddfa into langchain-ai:master May 6, 2024
60 checks passed
@efriis
Copy link
Contributor

efriis commented May 6, 2024

Hey team - going to revert this because it doesn't seem necessary for testing. We should only be adding optional + extended_testing dependencies for deps that have extended tests.

otherwise it just increases probability of dependency conflicts in the community lockfile.

efriis added a commit that referenced this pull request May 6, 2024
efriis added a commit that referenced this pull request May 6, 2024
Reverts #21174

Hey team - going to revert this because it doesn't seem necessary for
testing. We should only be adding optional + extended_testing
dependencies for deps that have extended tests.

otherwise it just increases probability of dependency conflicts in the
community lockfile.
@leo-gan leo-gan deleted the community-langkit-dependency branch May 6, 2024 21:19
dglogo pushed a commit to dglogo/langchain that referenced this pull request May 8, 2024
Issue: the `langkit` package is not presented in the `pyproject.toml`
but it is a requirement for the `WhyLabsCallbackHandler`
Change: added `langkit`

---------

Co-authored-by: Chester Curme <[email protected]>
dglogo pushed a commit to dglogo/langchain that referenced this pull request May 8, 2024
Reverts langchain-ai#21174

Hey team - going to revert this because it doesn't seem necessary for
testing. We should only be adding optional + extended_testing
dependencies for deps that have extended tests.

otherwise it just increases probability of dependency conflicts in the
community lockfile.
kyle-cassidy pushed a commit to kyle-cassidy/langchain that referenced this pull request May 10, 2024
Issue: the `langkit` package is not presented in the `pyproject.toml`
but it is a requirement for the `WhyLabsCallbackHandler`
Change: added `langkit`

---------

Co-authored-by: Chester Curme <[email protected]>
kyle-cassidy pushed a commit to kyle-cassidy/langchain that referenced this pull request May 10, 2024
Reverts langchain-ai#21174

Hey team - going to revert this because it doesn't seem necessary for
testing. We should only be adding optional + extended_testing
dependencies for deps that have extended tests.

otherwise it just increases probability of dependency conflicts in the
community lockfile.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm PR looks good. Use to confirm that a PR is ready for merging. 🤖:nit Small modifications/deletions, fixes, deps or improvements to existing code or docs size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants