-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixes to the graph package and added tests #108
Conversation
@CloverCho and I finished implementing Line 366 in 140e4b5
Line 369 in 140e4b5
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great to me!
|
||
expect(() => { | ||
this.connect(__in1, __out2) | ||
}).toThrowError("New connection introduces direct feed through.") // dist port already in use |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe that this test is wrong (even though it passes). Since there already is a mutation that establishes direct feed through, it doesn't seem like this connection should introduce it. I think the expected behavior here would be that the connection would be successful.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks great! 🚀 🚀 🚀
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I enabled running the tests, and it shows there still are some problems...
I'm going to go ahead and merge this since this is to be merged into the |
This is the branch where @lhstrh, @hokeun, @CloverCho, and I worked.
After the #107 PR, we tested the basic graph test (
graph.test.ts
) to find the error ofgraph.ts
.