wallet-amount #925
wallet-amount #925
Conversation
|
@Josh-121 is attempting to deploy a commit to the LFG Labs Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThe changes involve the addition of a new state variable Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
🔇 Additional comments (3)services/argentPortfolioService.ts (3)
The enhanced error message now includes the response text, which will help with debugging API issues.
Good practices observed:
Consider caching token info outside the loop. The current implementation fetches token info for each token inside the loop. This could be optimized by fetching all token info once before the loop. try {
const tokens = await fetchUserTokens(walletAddress, { signal }); // Fetch all tokens in wallet
+ const tokenInfo = await fetchTokens({ signal }); // Fetch once outside loop
let totalBalance = 0;
for (const token of tokens) {
try {
- const tokenInfo = await fetchTokens({ signal });
const decimals = tokenInfo[token.tokenAddress]?.decimals ?? 18;
const adjustedBalance = Number(token.tokenBalance) / 10 ** decimals;Additionally, consider implementing the parallel processing optimization from the previous review using Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
services/argentPortfolioService.ts (1)
85-87: Enhance error logging for better debugging.While the error handling strategy is good, the error messages could be more informative by including additional context.
- console.error(`Error calculating price for token ${token.tokenAddress}:`, err); + console.error(`Error calculating price for token ${token.tokenAddress} in wallet ${walletAddress}:`, err, { + tokenBalance: token.tokenBalance, + currency + }); - console.error("Error calculating total balance:", err); + console.error(`Error calculating total balance for wallet ${walletAddress}:`, err, { currency });Also applies to: 92-93
components/UI/profileCard/profileCard.tsx (1)
24-24: Consider using path aliases for better maintainability.Instead of using relative paths with multiple levels (
../../../), consider using path aliases (e.g.,@services/argentPortfolioService) for better maintainability and readability.-import { calculateTotalBalance } from '../../../services/argentPortfolioService'; +import { calculateTotalBalance } from '@services/argentPortfolioService';
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
components/UI/profileCard/profileCard.tsx(4 hunks)services/argentPortfolioService.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
services/argentPortfolioService.ts (2)
68-71: Function signature looks good!
The type definitions are well-structured with proper parameter typing and return type specification.
72-74:
Add input validation and handle numerical precision.
When dealing with financial calculations, consider these security aspects:
- Validate wallet address format:
try {
+ if (!/^0x[a-fA-F0-9]{63,64}$/.test(walletAddress)) {
+ throw new Error('Invalid StarkNet wallet address format');
+ }
const tokens = await fetchUserTokens(walletAddress);
let totalBalance = 0;- Handle numerical precision:
- let totalBalance = 0;
+ let totalBalance = 0n; // Use BigInt for precise calculations- Consider implementing rate limiting to prevent API abuse.
Let's verify the wallet address format used in the codebase:
components/UI/profileCard/profileCard.tsx (1)
24-24: Verify argentPortfolioService implementation and error handling.
Let's verify the implementation of the calculateTotalBalance function and its error handling capabilities.
Also applies to: 53-64
✅ Verification successful
Implementation and error handling are properly implemented
The calculateTotalBalance function is well-implemented with comprehensive error handling:
- Properly handles API errors through the
fetchDatautility - Implements nested try-catch blocks to handle both overall balance calculation and individual token price calculation errors
- Gracefully continues calculation even if individual token price calculations fail
- Properly propagates critical errors while logging error details
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the implementation of calculateTotalBalance in argentPortfolioService
# Test 1: Verify the function implementation
echo "Checking calculateTotalBalance implementation..."
rg -A 10 "calculateTotalBalance.*=.*async" --type typescript
# Test 2: Check for error handling patterns
echo "Checking error handling patterns..."
rg "throw.*Error" --type typescript services/argentPortfolioService.ts
Length of output: 393
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different approaches to locate and analyze the service
# Find the service file first
echo "Locating argentPortfolioService file..."
fd argentPortfolioService
# Search for calculateTotalBalance function with ripgrep without file type
echo "Searching for calculateTotalBalance implementation..."
rg -A 10 "calculateTotalBalance"
# Look for error handling patterns
echo "Checking error handling patterns..."
rg "throw.*Error" services
Length of output: 2782
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the complete implementation and error handling in argentPortfolioService
# Get the full content of argentPortfolioService
echo "Getting full service implementation..."
cat services/argentPortfolioService.ts
# Check for try-catch blocks in the service
echo "Checking error handling patterns..."
rg -A 5 "try \{" services/argentPortfolioService.ts
Length of output: 4130
services/argentPortfolioService.ts
Outdated
| for (const token of tokens) { | ||
| try { | ||
| // Calculate the price of each token and add it to the total balance | ||
| const tokenValue = await calculateTokenPrice( | ||
| token.tokenAddress, | ||
| token.tokenBalance, | ||
| currency | ||
| ); | ||
| totalBalance += tokenValue; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize performance with parallel processing and caching.
The sequential API calls in the loop could be slow for wallets with many tokens. Consider these optimizations:
- for (const token of tokens) {
- try {
- const tokenValue = await calculateTokenPrice(
- token.tokenAddress,
- token.tokenBalance,
- currency
- );
- totalBalance += tokenValue;
+ const tokenPromises = tokens.map(token =>
+ calculateTokenPrice(token.tokenAddress, token.tokenBalance, currency)
+ .catch(err => {
+ console.error(`Error calculating price for token ${token.tokenAddress}:`, err);
+ return 0;
+ })
+ );
+ const tokenValues = await Promise.all(tokenPromises);
+ totalBalance = tokenValues.reduce((sum, value) => sum + value, 0);Also, consider implementing a caching mechanism for token prices to reduce API calls:
- Cache token prices with a short TTL (e.g., 5 minutes)
- Implement rate limiting to avoid API throttling
- Consider batch price fetching if the API supports it
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| @@ -108,7 +123,7 @@ const ProfileCard: FunctionComponent<ProfileCardProps> = ({ | |||
| type={TEXT_TYPE.BODY_SMALL} | |||
| className={`${styles.wallet_amount} font-extrabold`} | |||
| > | |||
| $2,338.34 | |||
| {totalBalance !== null ? `$${totalBalance.toFixed(2)}` : "Loading..."} | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve balance display with better error handling and formatting.
The current implementation could be enhanced with:
- Error state display
- Proper number formatting for different locales
- Edge case handling for very large or small numbers
-{totalBalance !== null ? `$${totalBalance.toFixed(2)}` : "Loading..."}
+{balanceError ? (
+ <span className="text-red-500">{balanceError}</span>
+) : totalBalance !== null ? (
+ new Intl.NumberFormat('en-US', {
+ style: 'currency',
+ currency: 'USD',
+ minimumFractionDigits: 2,
+ maximumFractionDigits: 2
+ }).format(totalBalance)
+) : (
+ "Loading..."
+)}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
| @@ -108,7 +123,7 @@ const ProfileCard: FunctionComponent<ProfileCardProps> = ({ | |||
| type={TEXT_TYPE.BODY_SMALL} | |||
| className={`${styles.wallet_amount} font-extrabold`} | |||
| > | |||
| $2,338.34 | |||
| {totalBalance !== null ? `$${totalBalance.toFixed(2)}` : "Loading..."} | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please use a skeleton instead of "Loading..."
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
components/UI/profileCard/profileCard.tsx(5 hunks)services/argentPortfolioService.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- components/UI/profileCard/profileCard.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (4)
services/argentPortfolioService.ts (4)
68-71: LGTM! Function signature is well-defined.
The function signature is consistent with the codebase patterns and has proper type constraints.
72-75: LGTM! Error handling is robust and well-structured.
The implementation properly handles errors at different levels:
- Continues processing on token-level failures
- Provides detailed error context
- Maintains proper error propagation
Also applies to: 86-89, 91-95
76-85: Consider implementing the suggested performance optimizations.
The sequential processing of tokens could impact performance for wallets with many tokens.
The previous review comment about implementing parallel processing and caching is still applicable.
68-96: Verify error handling in the consuming component.
Let's ensure the profileCard component properly handles errors from this service.
✅ Verification successful
Error handling is properly implemented in the consuming component
The profileCard component has appropriate error handling for calculateTotalBalance:
- Uses try-catch block around the service call
- Logs errors appropriately with
console.error - Gracefully handles errors by not updating state, which maintains the loading state (Skeleton) in the UI
- Does not propagate errors to prevent component crashes
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check error handling in profileCard.tsx for calculateTotalBalance usage
# Test: Look for try-catch blocks around calculateTotalBalance calls
rg -A 5 "calculateTotalBalance.*catch" --type tsx
Length of output: 79
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# First, let's find the profile card component file
fd -e tsx -e ts "profileCard"
# Then, let's search for calculateTotalBalance usage in all TypeScript files
rg -t ts -t typescript "calculateTotalBalance" -A 5
Length of output: 203
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the profile card component content
cat components/UI/profileCard/profileCard.tsx
# Also search for calculateTotalBalance usage with ripgrep without file type specification
rg "calculateTotalBalance" -A 5
Length of output: 8517
Marchand-Nicolas
force-pushed
the
wallet-amount-implt
branch
from
7d6ada3 to
dd36184
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
services/argentPortfolioService.ts (1)
33-38: LGTM! Well-structured API implementations with proper typing.The implementations are clean, type-safe, and follow consistent patterns. However, consider implementing rate limiting for these API calls to prevent potential throttling issues.
Consider implementing a rate limiter utility to manage API request frequency:
class RateLimiter { private queue: Array<() => Promise<any>> = []; private processing = false; private lastCallTime = 0; private minInterval: number; constructor(requestsPerSecond: number) { this.minInterval = 1000 / requestsPerSecond; } async enqueue<T>(fn: () => Promise<T>): Promise<T> { return new Promise((resolve, reject) => { this.queue.push(async () => { try { resolve(await fn()); } catch (error) { reject(error); } }); this.process(); }); } private async process() { if (this.processing) return; this.processing = true; while (this.queue.length > 0) { const now = Date.now(); const waitTime = Math.max(0, this.lastCallTime + this.minInterval - now); await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, waitTime)); const fn = this.queue.shift(); if (fn) { this.lastCallTime = Date.now(); await fn(); } } this.processing = false; } }Also applies to: 42-47, 51-53, 58-60, 69-71
🛑 Comments failed to post (2)
services/argentPortfolioService.ts (2)
91-93:
⚠️ Potential issueOptimize token info fetching to prevent memory leaks.
The
fetchTokenscall inside the loop could lead to memory issues and unnecessary API calls. Consider fetching token info once before the loop.try { const tokens = await fetchUserTokens(walletAddress); + const tokenInfo = await fetchTokens(); // Fetch once before loop let totalBalance = 0; for (const token of tokens) { try { - const tokenInfo = await fetchTokens(); const decimals = tokenInfo[token.tokenAddress]?.decimals ?? 18;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const tokenInfo = await fetchTokens(); const decimals = tokenInfo[token.tokenAddress]?.decimals ?? 18; const adjustedBalance = Number(token.tokenBalance) / 10 ** decimals;
88-106: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider parallel processing for better performance.
The sequential processing of tokens could be slow for wallets with many tokens. Consider using Promise.all for parallel processing.
- for (const token of tokens) { - try { - const tokenInfo = await fetchTokens(); - const decimals = tokenInfo[token.tokenAddress]?.decimals ?? 18; - const adjustedBalance = Number(token.tokenBalance) / 10 ** decimals; - const tokenValue = await calculateTokenPrice( - token.tokenAddress, - adjustedBalance.toString(), - currency - ); - totalBalance += tokenValue; - } catch (err) { - console.error( - `Error calculating price for token ${token.tokenAddress}:`, - err - ); - } - } + const tokenInfo = await fetchTokens(); + const tokenPromises = tokens.map(async (token) => { + try { + const decimals = tokenInfo[token.tokenAddress]?.decimals ?? 18; + const adjustedBalance = Number(token.tokenBalance) / 10 ** decimals; + return await calculateTokenPrice( + token.tokenAddress, + adjustedBalance.toString(), + currency + ); + } catch (err) { + console.error(`Error calculating price for token ${token.tokenAddress}:`, err); + return 0; + } + }); + + const tokenValues = await Promise.all(tokenPromises); + totalBalance = tokenValues.reduce((sum, value) => sum + value, 0);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const tokenInfo = await fetchTokens(); const tokenPromises = tokens.map(async (token) => { try { const decimals = tokenInfo[token.tokenAddress]?.decimals ?? 18; const adjustedBalance = Number(token.tokenBalance) / 10 ** decimals; return await calculateTokenPrice( token.tokenAddress, adjustedBalance.toString(), currency ); } catch (err) { console.error(`Error calculating price for token ${token.tokenAddress}:`, err); return 0; } }); const tokenValues = await Promise.all(tokenPromises); totalBalance = tokenValues.reduce((sum, value) => sum + value, 0);
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
services/argentPortfolioService.ts (1)
33-38: LGTM! Well-structured API functions with proper typing.The refactored functions provide good type safety and efficient data transformations. Consider adding specific error types for better error handling across the service.
// Add at the top of the file class ArgentAPIError extends Error { constructor(public status?: number, message?: string) { super(message); this.name = 'ArgentAPIError'; } }Also applies to: 42-47, 51-53, 58-60, 69-71
components/admin/questDetails.tsx (1)
177-177: LGTM! The case-insensitive check improves robustness.The change to use
toLowerCase()makes the Discord task detection more reliable by handling different case variations.Consider extracting "discord" as a constant to improve maintainability:
+const DISCORD_TASK_IDENTIFIER = "discord"; + const AdminQuestDetails: FunctionComponent<QuestDetailsProps> = ({ // ... customError={ - task?.name?.toLowerCase().includes("discord") + task?.name?.toLowerCase().includes(DISCORD_TASK_IDENTIFIER) ? customError : "" }components/quests/questDetails.tsx (1)
382-382: LGTM! Consider adding null/undefined check for better safety.The change to use case-insensitive comparison for Discord task error handling is a good improvement. However, we can make it even more robust by adding a null/undefined check.
Consider this safer version:
- task?.name?.toLowerCase().includes("discord") + task?.name?.toLowerCase?.()?.includes("discord") ?? falseThis ensures the code handles cases where
toLowerCase()might not be available (e.g., if name is unexpectedly not a string).
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
components/UI/profileCard/profileCard.tsx(5 hunks)components/admin/questDetails.tsx(1 hunks)components/quests/questDetails.tsx(1 hunks)services/argentPortfolioService.ts(3 hunks)utils/parser.ts(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- components/UI/profileCard/profileCard.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (5)
services/argentPortfolioService.ts (3)
23-23: LGTM! Enhanced error handling.
The improved error message now includes both the status code and response text, making debugging easier.
91-93: LGTM! Proper handling of token decimals.
The implementation correctly handles different token decimal places by fetching token info and using the appropriate decimal value.
88-106: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize token info fetching.
The current implementation fetches token info inside the loop, which could lead to unnecessary API calls and potential performance issues.
Consider fetching all token info once before the loop:
try {
const tokens = await fetchUserTokens(walletAddress);
+ const tokenInfo = await fetchTokens(); // Fetch once outside the loop
let totalBalance = 0;
for (const token of tokens) {
try {
- const tokenInfo = await fetchTokens();
const decimals = tokenInfo[token.tokenAddress]?.decimals ?? 18;
const adjustedBalance = Number(token.tokenBalance) / 10 ** decimals;Additionally, the previous review comment about parallel processing using Promise.all() is still valid and worth considering for further optimization.
components/admin/questDetails.tsx (1)
Line range hint 1-248: Verify PR scope and title.
The PR is titled "wallet-amount" and the AI summary mentions wallet balance changes, but the code changes in this file only improve Discord task error handling. This suggests there might be additional changes not included in this review or the PR title might need updating.
Let's check for wallet-related changes in the codebase:
utils/parser.ts (1)
125-128: LGTM! Simplified sprite calculations.
The removal of null coalescing operators is safe here since the tileset existence is already validated by the guard clause above.
Pull Request type
Please add the labels corresponding to the type of changes your PR introduces:
Resolves: #NA
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes