Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
[ValueTracking] Extend LHS/RHS with matching operand to work without …
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
…constants.

Previously we only handled the `L0 == R0` case if both `L1` and `R1`
where constant.

We can get more out of the analysis using general constant ranges
instead.

For example, `X u> Y` implies `X != 0`.

In general, any strict comparison on `X` implies that `X` is not equal
to the boundary value for the sign and constant ranges with/without
sign bits can be useful in deducing implications.
  • Loading branch information
goldsteinn committed Mar 16, 2024
1 parent 8f878c5 commit 69ab890
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 7 changed files with 58 additions and 46 deletions.
61 changes: 44 additions & 17 deletions llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -8499,20 +8499,20 @@ isImpliedCondMatchingOperands(CmpInst::Predicate LPred,
return std::nullopt;
}

/// Return true if "icmp LPred X, LC" implies "icmp RPred X, RC" is true.
/// Return false if "icmp LPred X, LC" implies "icmp RPred X, RC" is false.
/// Return true if "icmp LPred X, LCR" implies "icmp RPred X, RCR" is true.
/// Return false if "icmp LPred X, LCR" implies "icmp RPred X, RCR" is false.
/// Otherwise, return std::nullopt if we can't infer anything.
static std::optional<bool> isImpliedCondCommonOperandWithConstants(
CmpInst::Predicate LPred, const APInt &LC, CmpInst::Predicate RPred,
const APInt &RC) {
ConstantRange DomCR = ConstantRange::makeExactICmpRegion(LPred, LC);
ConstantRange CR = ConstantRange::makeExactICmpRegion(RPred, RC);
ConstantRange Intersection = DomCR.intersectWith(CR);
ConstantRange Difference = DomCR.difference(CR);
if (Intersection.isEmptySet())
return false;
if (Difference.isEmptySet())
static std::optional<bool>
isImpliedCondCommonOperandWithCR(CmpInst::Predicate LPred, ConstantRange LCR,
CmpInst::Predicate RPred, ConstantRange RCR) {
ConstantRange DomCR = ConstantRange::makeAllowedICmpRegion(LPred, LCR);
// If all true values for lhs and true for rhs, lhs implies rhs
if (DomCR.icmp(RPred, RCR))
return true;

// If there is no overlap, lhs implies not rhs
if (DomCR.icmp(CmpInst::getInversePredicate(RPred), RCR))
return false;
return std::nullopt;
}

Expand All @@ -8532,11 +8532,38 @@ static std::optional<bool> isImpliedCondICmps(const ICmpInst *LHS,
CmpInst::Predicate LPred =
LHSIsTrue ? LHS->getPredicate() : LHS->getInversePredicate();

// Can we infer anything when the 0-operands match and the 1-operands are
// constants (not necessarily matching)?
const APInt *LC, *RC;
if (L0 == R0 && match(L1, m_APInt(LC)) && match(R1, m_APInt(RC)))
return isImpliedCondCommonOperandWithConstants(LPred, *LC, RPred, *RC);
if (L0 == R1) {
std::swap(R0, R1);
RPred = ICmpInst::getSwappedPredicate(RPred);
}
if (L1 == R0) {
std::swap(L0, L1);
LPred = ICmpInst::getSwappedPredicate(LPred);
}

// See if we can infer anything if operand-0 matches and we have at least one
// constant operand-1.
if (L0 == R0 && L0->getType()->isIntOrIntVectorTy()) {
// Potential TODO: We could also further use the constant range of L0/R0 to
// further constraint the constant ranges. At the moment this leads to
// several regressions related to not transforming `multi_use(A + C0) eq/ne
// C1` (see discussion: D58633).
ConstantRange LCR = computeConstantRange(
L1, ICmpInst::isSigned(LPred), /* UseInstrInfo=*/true, /*AC=*/nullptr,
/*CxtI=*/nullptr, /*DT=*/nullptr, Depth);
ConstantRange RCR = computeConstantRange(
R1, ICmpInst::isSigned(RPred), /* UseInstrInfo=*/true, /*AC=*/nullptr,
/*CxtI=*/nullptr, /*DT=*/nullptr, Depth);
// Even if L1/R1 are not both constant, we can still sometimes deduce
// relationship from a single constant. For example X u> Y implies X != 0.
if (auto R = isImpliedCondCommonOperandWithCR(LPred, LCR, RPred, RCR))
return R;
// If both L1/R1 where exact constant ranges and we didn't get anything
// here, we won't be able to deduce this.
const APInt *Unused;
if (match(L1, m_APInt(Unused)) && match(R1, m_APInt(Unused)))
return std::nullopt;
}

// Can we infer anything when the two compares have matching operands?
bool AreSwappedOps;
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/assume.ll
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ define i1 @nonnull5(ptr %a) {
define i32 @assumption_conflicts_with_known_bits(i32 %a, i32 %b) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @assumption_conflicts_with_known_bits(
; CHECK-NEXT: store i1 true, ptr poison, align 1
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 1
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 poison
;
%and1 = and i32 %b, 3
%B1 = lshr i32 %and1, %and1
Expand Down
12 changes: 2 additions & 10 deletions llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/range-check.ll
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -340,11 +340,7 @@ define i1 @negative4_logical(i32 %x, i32 %n) {

define i1 @negative5(i32 %x, i32 %n) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @negative5(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[NN:%.*]] = and i32 [[N:%.*]], 2147483647
; CHECK-NEXT: [[A:%.*]] = icmp sgt i32 [[NN]], [[X:%.*]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[B:%.*]] = icmp sgt i32 [[X]], -1
; CHECK-NEXT: [[C:%.*]] = or i1 [[A]], [[B]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[C]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 true
;
%nn = and i32 %n, 2147483647
%a = icmp slt i32 %x, %nn
Expand All @@ -355,11 +351,7 @@ define i1 @negative5(i32 %x, i32 %n) {

define i1 @negative5_logical(i32 %x, i32 %n) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @negative5_logical(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[NN:%.*]] = and i32 [[N:%.*]], 2147483647
; CHECK-NEXT: [[A:%.*]] = icmp sgt i32 [[NN]], [[X:%.*]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[B:%.*]] = icmp sgt i32 [[X]], -1
; CHECK-NEXT: [[C:%.*]] = or i1 [[A]], [[B]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[C]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 true
;
%nn = and i32 %n, 2147483647
%a = icmp slt i32 %x, %nn
Expand Down
6 changes: 2 additions & 4 deletions llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/select.ll
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2925,10 +2925,8 @@ define i8 @select_replacement_loop3(i32 noundef %x) {

define i16 @select_replacement_loop4(i16 noundef %p_12) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @select_replacement_loop4(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[CMP1:%.*]] = icmp ult i16 [[P_12:%.*]], 2
; CHECK-NEXT: [[AND1:%.*]] = and i16 [[P_12]], 1
; CHECK-NEXT: [[AND2:%.*]] = select i1 [[CMP1]], i16 [[AND1]], i16 0
; CHECK-NEXT: [[CMP2:%.*]] = icmp eq i16 [[AND2]], [[P_12]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[AND1:%.*]] = and i16 [[P_12:%.*]], 1
; CHECK-NEXT: [[CMP2:%.*]] = icmp ult i16 [[P_12]], 2
; CHECK-NEXT: [[AND3:%.*]] = select i1 [[CMP2]], i16 [[AND1]], i16 0
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i16 [[AND3]]
;
Expand Down
7 changes: 3 additions & 4 deletions llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/shift.ll
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1751,12 +1751,11 @@ define void @ashr_out_of_range_1(ptr %A) {
; CHECK-NEXT: [[L:%.*]] = load i177, ptr [[A:%.*]], align 4
; CHECK-NEXT: [[L_FROZEN:%.*]] = freeze i177 [[L]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = icmp eq i177 [[L_FROZEN]], -1
; CHECK-NEXT: [[B:%.*]] = select i1 [[TMP1]], i177 0, i177 [[L_FROZEN]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP2:%.*]] = trunc i177 [[B]] to i64
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP6:%.*]] = trunc i177 [[L_FROZEN]] to i64
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP2:%.*]] = select i1 [[TMP1]], i64 0, i64 [[TMP6]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP3:%.*]] = getelementptr i177, ptr [[A]], i64 [[TMP2]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[G11:%.*]] = getelementptr i8, ptr [[TMP3]], i64 -24
; CHECK-NEXT: [[C17:%.*]] = icmp sgt i177 [[B]], [[L_FROZEN]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP4:%.*]] = sext i1 [[C17]] to i64
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP4:%.*]] = sext i1 [[TMP1]] to i64
; CHECK-NEXT: [[G62:%.*]] = getelementptr i177, ptr [[G11]], i64 [[TMP4]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP5:%.*]] = icmp eq i177 [[L_FROZEN]], -1
; CHECK-NEXT: [[B28:%.*]] = select i1 [[TMP5]], i177 0, i177 [[L_FROZEN]]
Expand Down
7 changes: 3 additions & 4 deletions llvm/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/pr23997.ll
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -12,8 +12,7 @@ define void @foo(ptr addrspace(1) align 8 dereferenceable_or_null(16), ptr addrs
; CHECK: preheader:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[DOT10:%.*]] = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr addrspace(1) [[TMP0:%.*]], i64 16
; CHECK-NEXT: [[DOT12:%.*]] = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr addrspace(1) [[TMP1:%.*]], i64 16
; CHECK-NEXT: [[UMAX2:%.*]] = call i64 @llvm.umax.i64(i64 [[TMP2:%.*]], i64 1)
; CHECK-NEXT: [[MIN_ITERS_CHECK:%.*]] = icmp ult i64 [[TMP2]], 16
; CHECK-NEXT: [[MIN_ITERS_CHECK:%.*]] = icmp ult i64 [[TMP2:%.*]], 16
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[MIN_ITERS_CHECK]], label [[SCALAR_PH:%.*]], label [[VECTOR_MEMCHECK:%.*]]
; CHECK: vector.memcheck:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP3:%.*]] = shl i64 [[TMP2]], 3
Expand All @@ -25,7 +24,7 @@ define void @foo(ptr addrspace(1) align 8 dereferenceable_or_null(16), ptr addrs
; CHECK-NEXT: [[FOUND_CONFLICT:%.*]] = and i1 [[BOUND0]], [[BOUND1]]
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[FOUND_CONFLICT]], label [[SCALAR_PH]], label [[VECTOR_PH:%.*]]
; CHECK: vector.ph:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[N_VEC:%.*]] = and i64 [[UMAX2]], -16
; CHECK-NEXT: [[N_VEC:%.*]] = and i64 [[TMP2]], -16
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[VECTOR_BODY:%.*]]
; CHECK: vector.body:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[INDEX:%.*]] = phi i64 [ 0, [[VECTOR_PH]] ], [ [[INDEX_NEXT:%.*]], [[VECTOR_BODY]] ]
Expand All @@ -49,7 +48,7 @@ define void @foo(ptr addrspace(1) align 8 dereferenceable_or_null(16), ptr addrs
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP13:%.*]] = icmp eq i64 [[INDEX_NEXT]], [[N_VEC]]
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[TMP13]], label [[MIDDLE_BLOCK:%.*]], label [[VECTOR_BODY]], !llvm.loop [[LOOP5:![0-9]+]]
; CHECK: middle.block:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[CMP_N:%.*]] = icmp eq i64 [[UMAX2]], [[N_VEC]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[CMP_N:%.*]] = icmp eq i64 [[N_VEC]], [[TMP2]]
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[CMP_N]], label [[LOOPEXIT:%.*]], label [[SCALAR_PH]]
; CHECK: scalar.ph:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[BC_RESUME_VAL:%.*]] = phi i64 [ [[N_VEC]], [[MIDDLE_BLOCK]] ], [ 0, [[PREHEADER]] ], [ 0, [[VECTOR_MEMCHECK]] ]
Expand Down
9 changes: 3 additions & 6 deletions llvm/test/Transforms/NewGVN/pr35125.ll
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -18,15 +18,12 @@ define i32 @main() #0 {
; CHECK-NEXT: [[CMP2:%.*]] = icmp ult i32 [[STOREMERGE]], [[PHIOFOPS]]
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[CMP2]], label [[IF_THEN3:%.*]], label [[IF_END6:%.*]]
; CHECK: if.then3:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TOBOOL:%.*]] = icmp eq i32 [[STOREMERGE]], -1
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[TOBOOL]], label [[LOR_RHS:%.*]], label [[LOR_END:%.*]]
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 false, label [[LOR_RHS:%.*]], label [[LOR_END:%.*]]
; CHECK: lor.rhs:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TOBOOL5:%.*]] = icmp ne i32 [[TMP0]], 0
; CHECK-NEXT: [[PHITMP:%.*]] = zext i1 [[TOBOOL5]] to i32
; CHECK-NEXT: store i8 poison, ptr null, align 1
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[LOR_END]]
; CHECK: lor.end:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = phi i32 [ 1, [[IF_THEN3]] ], [ [[PHITMP]], [[LOR_RHS]] ]
; CHECK-NEXT: store i32 [[TMP1]], ptr @a, align 4
; CHECK-NEXT: store i32 1, ptr @a, align 4
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[IF_END6]]
; CHECK: if.end6:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP2:%.*]] = load i32, ptr @a, align 4
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 69ab890

Please sign in to comment.