Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reapply "[clang analysis][thread-safety] Handle return-by-reference..… #68572

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 19, 2023

Conversation

legrosbuffle
Copy link
Contributor

@legrosbuffle legrosbuffle commented Oct 9, 2023

…… (#68394)"

The new warnings are now under a separate flag -Wthread-safety-reference-return, which is on by default under -Wthread-safety-reference.

  • People can opt out via -Wthread-safety-reference -Wnothread-safety-reference-return.
    This reverts commit 859f2d0.

@llvmbot llvmbot added clang Clang issues not falling into any other category clang:frontend Language frontend issues, e.g. anything involving "Sema" clang:dataflow Clang Dataflow Analysis framework - https://clang.llvm.org/docs/DataFlowAnalysisIntro.html clang:analysis labels Oct 9, 2023
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Oct 9, 2023

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-analysis

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang

Changes

…… (#68394)"

The new warnings are now under a separate flag -Wthread-safety-reference-return. The plan is:

  • Start with a period where people can opt into the new warnings with -Wthread-safety-reference-return or -Wthread-safety-beta. This allows downstream to test the new warnings without having to roll the implementation back and forth.
  • Make -Wthread-safety-reference-return part of -Wthread-safety-reference. People can opt out via -Wthread-safety-reference -Wnothread-safety-reference-return.
  • (maybe) delete -Wthread-safety-reference-return after some time ?

This reverts commit 859f2d0.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68572.diff

6 Files Affected:

  • (modified) clang/include/clang/Analysis/Analyses/ThreadSafety.h (+7-1)
  • (modified) clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticGroups.td (+8-6)
  • (modified) clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td (+9-1)
  • (modified) clang/lib/Analysis/ThreadSafety.cpp (+54-26)
  • (modified) clang/lib/Sema/AnalysisBasedWarnings.cpp (+12)
  • (modified) clang/test/SemaCXX/warn-thread-safety-analysis.cpp (+79)
diff --git a/clang/include/clang/Analysis/Analyses/ThreadSafety.h b/clang/include/clang/Analysis/Analyses/ThreadSafety.h
index 1808d1d71e05d2c..0866b09bab2995e 100644
--- a/clang/include/clang/Analysis/Analyses/ThreadSafety.h
+++ b/clang/include/clang/Analysis/Analyses/ThreadSafety.h
@@ -47,7 +47,13 @@ enum ProtectedOperationKind {
   POK_PassByRef,
 
   /// Passing a pt-guarded variable by reference.
-  POK_PtPassByRef
+  POK_PtPassByRef,
+
+  /// Returning a guarded variable by reference.
+  POK_ReturnByRef,
+
+  /// Returning a pt-guarded variable by reference.
+  POK_PtReturnByRef,
 };
 
 /// This enum distinguishes between different kinds of lock actions. For
diff --git a/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticGroups.td b/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticGroups.td
index 0b09c002191848a..0462919af660285 100644
--- a/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticGroups.td
+++ b/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticGroups.td
@@ -1061,18 +1061,20 @@ def Most : DiagGroup<"most", [
  ]>;
 
 // Thread Safety warnings
-def ThreadSafetyAttributes : DiagGroup<"thread-safety-attributes">;
-def ThreadSafetyAnalysis   : DiagGroup<"thread-safety-analysis">;
-def ThreadSafetyPrecise    : DiagGroup<"thread-safety-precise">;
-def ThreadSafetyReference  : DiagGroup<"thread-safety-reference">;
-def ThreadSafetyNegative   : DiagGroup<"thread-safety-negative">;
+def ThreadSafetyAttributes       : DiagGroup<"thread-safety-attributes">;
+def ThreadSafetyAnalysis         : DiagGroup<"thread-safety-analysis">;
+def ThreadSafetyPrecise          : DiagGroup<"thread-safety-precise">;
+def ThreadSafetyReference        : DiagGroup<"thread-safety-reference">;
+def ThreadSafetyReferenceReturn  : DiagGroup<"thread-safety-reference-return">;
+def ThreadSafetyNegative         : DiagGroup<"thread-safety-negative">;
 def ThreadSafety : DiagGroup<"thread-safety",
                              [ThreadSafetyAttributes,
                               ThreadSafetyAnalysis,
                               ThreadSafetyPrecise,
                               ThreadSafetyReference]>;
 def ThreadSafetyVerbose : DiagGroup<"thread-safety-verbose">;
-def ThreadSafetyBeta : DiagGroup<"thread-safety-beta">;
+def ThreadSafetyBeta : DiagGroup<"thread-safety-beta",
+                                 [ThreadSafetyReferenceReturn]>;
 
 // Uniqueness Analysis warnings
 def Consumed       : DiagGroup<"consumed">;
diff --git a/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td b/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
index b211680a0e9b6e9..c777d73dd4a769b 100644
--- a/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
+++ b/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
@@ -3864,7 +3864,7 @@ def warn_fun_requires_negative_cap : Warning<
   "calling function %0 requires negative capability '%1'">,
   InGroup<ThreadSafetyAnalysis>, DefaultIgnore;
 
-// Thread safety warnings on pass by reference
+// Thread safety warnings on pass/return by reference
 def warn_guarded_pass_by_reference : Warning<
   "passing variable %1 by reference requires holding %0 "
   "%select{'%2'|'%2' exclusively}3">,
@@ -3873,6 +3873,14 @@ def warn_pt_guarded_pass_by_reference : Warning<
   "passing the value that %1 points to by reference requires holding %0 "
   "%select{'%2'|'%2' exclusively}3">,
   InGroup<ThreadSafetyReference>, DefaultIgnore;
+def warn_guarded_return_by_reference : Warning<
+  "returning variable %1 by reference requires holding %0 "
+  "%select{'%2'|'%2' exclusively}3">,
+  InGroup<ThreadSafetyReferenceReturn>, DefaultIgnore;
+def warn_pt_guarded_return_by_reference : Warning<
+  "returning the value that %1 points to by reference requires holding %0 "
+  "%select{'%2'|'%2' exclusively}3">,
+  InGroup<ThreadSafetyReferenceReturn>, DefaultIgnore;
 
 // Imprecise thread safety warnings
 def warn_variable_requires_lock : Warning<
diff --git a/clang/lib/Analysis/ThreadSafety.cpp b/clang/lib/Analysis/ThreadSafety.cpp
index 58dd7113665b132..54d0e95c6bd79a2 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Analysis/ThreadSafety.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Analysis/ThreadSafety.cpp
@@ -1008,7 +1008,7 @@ class ThreadSafetyAnalyzer {
   threadSafety::SExprBuilder SxBuilder;
 
   ThreadSafetyHandler &Handler;
-  const CXXMethodDecl *CurrentMethod = nullptr;
+  const FunctionDecl *CurrentFunction;
   LocalVariableMap LocalVarMap;
   FactManager FactMan;
   std::vector<CFGBlockInfo> BlockInfo;
@@ -1243,10 +1243,10 @@ bool ThreadSafetyAnalyzer::inCurrentScope(const CapabilityExpr &CapE) {
 
   // Members are in scope from methods of the same class.
   if (const auto *P = dyn_cast<til::Project>(SExp)) {
-    if (!CurrentMethod)
+    if (!isa_and_nonnull<CXXMethodDecl>(CurrentFunction))
       return false;
     const ValueDecl *VD = P->clangDecl();
-    return VD->getDeclContext() == CurrentMethod->getDeclContext();
+    return VD->getDeclContext() == CurrentFunction->getDeclContext();
   }
 
   return false;
@@ -1541,6 +1541,8 @@ class BuildLockset : public ConstStmtVisitor<BuildLockset> {
 
   ThreadSafetyAnalyzer *Analyzer;
   FactSet FSet;
+  // The fact set for the function on exit.
+  const FactSet &FunctionExitFSet;
   /// Maps constructed objects to `this` placeholder prior to initialization.
   llvm::SmallDenseMap<const Expr *, til::LiteralPtr *> ConstructedObjects;
   LocalVariableMap::Context LVarCtx;
@@ -1566,9 +1568,11 @@ class BuildLockset : public ConstStmtVisitor<BuildLockset> {
                         bool SkipFirstParam = false);
 
 public:
-  BuildLockset(ThreadSafetyAnalyzer *Anlzr, CFGBlockInfo &Info)
+  BuildLockset(ThreadSafetyAnalyzer *Anlzr, CFGBlockInfo &Info,
+               const FactSet &FunctionExitFSet)
       : ConstStmtVisitor<BuildLockset>(), Analyzer(Anlzr), FSet(Info.EntrySet),
-        LVarCtx(Info.EntryContext), CtxIndex(Info.EntryIndex) {}
+        FunctionExitFSet(FunctionExitFSet), LVarCtx(Info.EntryContext),
+        CtxIndex(Info.EntryIndex) {}
 
   void VisitUnaryOperator(const UnaryOperator *UO);
   void VisitBinaryOperator(const BinaryOperator *BO);
@@ -1577,6 +1581,7 @@ class BuildLockset : public ConstStmtVisitor<BuildLockset> {
   void VisitCXXConstructExpr(const CXXConstructExpr *Exp);
   void VisitDeclStmt(const DeclStmt *S);
   void VisitMaterializeTemporaryExpr(const MaterializeTemporaryExpr *Exp);
+  void VisitReturnStmt(const ReturnStmt *S);
 };
 
 } // namespace
@@ -1758,6 +1763,8 @@ void ThreadSafetyAnalyzer::checkPtAccess(const FactSet &FSet, const Expr *Exp,
   // Pass by reference warnings are under a different flag.
   ProtectedOperationKind PtPOK = POK_VarDereference;
   if (POK == POK_PassByRef) PtPOK = POK_PtPassByRef;
+  if (POK == POK_ReturnByRef)
+    PtPOK = POK_PtReturnByRef;
 
   const ValueDecl *D = getValueDecl(Exp);
   if (!D || !D->hasAttrs())
@@ -2142,6 +2149,25 @@ void BuildLockset::VisitMaterializeTemporaryExpr(
   }
 }
 
+void BuildLockset::VisitReturnStmt(const ReturnStmt *S) {
+  if (Analyzer->CurrentFunction == nullptr)
+    return;
+  const Expr *RetVal = S->getRetValue();
+  if (!RetVal)
+    return;
+
+  // If returning by reference, check that the function requires the appropriate
+  // capabilities.
+  const QualType ReturnType =
+      Analyzer->CurrentFunction->getReturnType().getCanonicalType();
+  if (ReturnType->isLValueReferenceType()) {
+    Analyzer->checkAccess(
+        FunctionExitFSet, RetVal,
+        ReturnType->getPointeeType().isConstQualified() ? AK_Read : AK_Written,
+        POK_ReturnByRef);
+  }
+}
+
 /// Given two facts merging on a join point, possibly warn and decide whether to
 /// keep or replace.
 ///
@@ -2251,8 +2277,7 @@ void ThreadSafetyAnalyzer::runAnalysis(AnalysisDeclContext &AC) {
 
   CFG *CFGraph = walker.getGraph();
   const NamedDecl *D = walker.getDecl();
-  const auto *CurrentFunction = dyn_cast<FunctionDecl>(D);
-  CurrentMethod = dyn_cast<CXXMethodDecl>(D);
+  CurrentFunction = dyn_cast<FunctionDecl>(D);
 
   if (D->hasAttr<NoThreadSafetyAnalysisAttr>())
     return;
@@ -2278,7 +2303,7 @@ void ThreadSafetyAnalyzer::runAnalysis(AnalysisDeclContext &AC) {
   PostOrderCFGView::CFGBlockSet VisitedBlocks(CFGraph);
 
   CFGBlockInfo &Initial = BlockInfo[CFGraph->getEntry().getBlockID()];
-  CFGBlockInfo &Final   = BlockInfo[CFGraph->getExit().getBlockID()];
+  CFGBlockInfo &Final = BlockInfo[CFGraph->getExit().getBlockID()];
 
   // Mark entry block as reachable
   Initial.Reachable = true;
@@ -2348,6 +2373,25 @@ void ThreadSafetyAnalyzer::runAnalysis(AnalysisDeclContext &AC) {
     }
   }
 
+  // Compute the expected exit set.
+  // By default, we expect all locks held on entry to be held on exit.
+  FactSet ExpectedFunctionExitSet = Initial.EntrySet;
+
+  // Adjust the expected exit set by adding or removing locks, as declared
+  // by *-LOCK_FUNCTION and UNLOCK_FUNCTION.  The intersect below will then
+  // issue the appropriate warning.
+  // FIXME: the location here is not quite right.
+  for (const auto &Lock : ExclusiveLocksAcquired)
+    ExpectedFunctionExitSet.addLock(
+        FactMan, std::make_unique<LockableFactEntry>(Lock, LK_Exclusive,
+                                                     D->getLocation()));
+  for (const auto &Lock : SharedLocksAcquired)
+    ExpectedFunctionExitSet.addLock(
+        FactMan,
+        std::make_unique<LockableFactEntry>(Lock, LK_Shared, D->getLocation()));
+  for (const auto &Lock : LocksReleased)
+    ExpectedFunctionExitSet.removeLock(FactMan, Lock);
+
   for (const auto *CurrBlock : *SortedGraph) {
     unsigned CurrBlockID = CurrBlock->getBlockID();
     CFGBlockInfo *CurrBlockInfo = &BlockInfo[CurrBlockID];
@@ -2407,7 +2451,7 @@ void ThreadSafetyAnalyzer::runAnalysis(AnalysisDeclContext &AC) {
     if (!CurrBlockInfo->Reachable)
       continue;
 
-    BuildLockset LocksetBuilder(this, *CurrBlockInfo);
+    BuildLockset LocksetBuilder(this, *CurrBlockInfo, ExpectedFunctionExitSet);
 
     // Visit all the statements in the basic block.
     for (const auto &BI : *CurrBlock) {
@@ -2483,24 +2527,8 @@ void ThreadSafetyAnalyzer::runAnalysis(AnalysisDeclContext &AC) {
   if (!Final.Reachable)
     return;
 
-  // By default, we expect all locks held on entry to be held on exit.
-  FactSet ExpectedExitSet = Initial.EntrySet;
-
-  // Adjust the expected exit set by adding or removing locks, as declared
-  // by *-LOCK_FUNCTION and UNLOCK_FUNCTION.  The intersect below will then
-  // issue the appropriate warning.
-  // FIXME: the location here is not quite right.
-  for (const auto &Lock : ExclusiveLocksAcquired)
-    ExpectedExitSet.addLock(FactMan, std::make_unique<LockableFactEntry>(
-                                         Lock, LK_Exclusive, D->getLocation()));
-  for (const auto &Lock : SharedLocksAcquired)
-    ExpectedExitSet.addLock(FactMan, std::make_unique<LockableFactEntry>(
-                                         Lock, LK_Shared, D->getLocation()));
-  for (const auto &Lock : LocksReleased)
-    ExpectedExitSet.removeLock(FactMan, Lock);
-
   // FIXME: Should we call this function for all blocks which exit the function?
-  intersectAndWarn(ExpectedExitSet, Final.ExitSet, Final.ExitLoc,
+  intersectAndWarn(ExpectedFunctionExitSet, Final.ExitSet, Final.ExitLoc,
                    LEK_LockedAtEndOfFunction, LEK_NotLockedAtEndOfFunction);
 
   Handler.leaveFunction(CurrentFunction);
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/AnalysisBasedWarnings.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/AnalysisBasedWarnings.cpp
index 77bb560eb6288f7..0947e8b0f526a3b 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/AnalysisBasedWarnings.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/AnalysisBasedWarnings.cpp
@@ -1983,6 +1983,12 @@ class ThreadSafetyReporter : public clang::threadSafety::ThreadSafetyHandler {
         case POK_PtPassByRef:
           DiagID = diag::warn_pt_guarded_pass_by_reference;
           break;
+        case POK_ReturnByRef:
+          DiagID = diag::warn_guarded_return_by_reference;
+          break;
+        case POK_PtReturnByRef:
+          DiagID = diag::warn_pt_guarded_return_by_reference;
+          break;
       }
       PartialDiagnosticAt Warning(Loc, S.PDiag(DiagID) << Kind
                                                        << D
@@ -2013,6 +2019,12 @@ class ThreadSafetyReporter : public clang::threadSafety::ThreadSafetyHandler {
         case POK_PtPassByRef:
           DiagID = diag::warn_pt_guarded_pass_by_reference;
           break;
+        case POK_ReturnByRef:
+          DiagID = diag::warn_guarded_return_by_reference;
+          break;
+        case POK_PtReturnByRef:
+          DiagID = diag::warn_pt_guarded_return_by_reference;
+          break;
       }
       PartialDiagnosticAt Warning(Loc, S.PDiag(DiagID) << Kind
                                                        << D
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/warn-thread-safety-analysis.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/warn-thread-safety-analysis.cpp
index 8e312e589d81160..205cfa284f6c9c9 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/warn-thread-safety-analysis.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/warn-thread-safety-analysis.cpp
@@ -5580,6 +5580,85 @@ class Bar {
   }
 };
 
+class Return {
+  Mutex mu;
+  Foo foo GUARDED_BY(mu);
+  Foo* foo_ptr PT_GUARDED_BY(mu);
+
+  Foo returns_value_locked() {
+    MutexLock lock(&mu);
+    return foo;
+  }
+
+  Foo returns_value_locks_required() EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(mu) {
+    return foo;
+  }
+
+  Foo returns_value_releases_lock_after_return() UNLOCK_FUNCTION(mu) {
+    MutexLock lock(&mu, true);
+    return foo;
+  }
+
+  Foo returns_value_aquires_lock() EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION(mu) {
+    mu.Lock();
+    return foo;
+  }
+  
+  Foo returns_value_not_locked() {
+    return foo;               // expected-warning {{reading variable 'foo' requires holding mutex 'mu'}}
+  }
+  
+  Foo returns_value_releases_lock_before_return() UNLOCK_FUNCTION(mu) {
+    mu.Unlock();
+    return foo;               // expected-warning {{reading variable 'foo' requires holding mutex 'mu'}}
+  }
+
+  Foo &returns_ref_not_locked() {
+    return foo;               // expected-warning {{returning variable 'foo' by reference requires holding mutex 'mu'}}
+  }
+
+  Foo &returns_ref_locked() {
+    MutexLock lock(&mu);
+    return foo;               // expected-warning {{returning variable 'foo' by reference requires holding mutex 'mu'}}
+  }
+
+  Foo &returns_ref_shared_locks_required() SHARED_LOCKS_REQUIRED(mu) {
+    return foo;               // expected-warning {{returning variable 'foo' by reference requires holding mutex 'mu' exclusively}}
+  }
+
+  Foo &returns_ref_exclusive_locks_required() EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(mu) {
+    return foo;
+  }
+
+  Foo &returns_ref_releases_lock_after_return() UNLOCK_FUNCTION(mu) {
+    MutexLock lock(&mu, true);
+    return foo;               // expected-warning {{returning variable 'foo' by reference requires holding mutex 'mu' exclusively}}
+  }
+
+  Foo& returns_ref_releases_lock_before_return() UNLOCK_FUNCTION(mu) {
+    mu.Unlock();
+    return foo;               // // expected-warning {{returning variable 'foo' by reference requires holding mutex 'mu' exclusively}}
+  }
+  
+  Foo &returns_ref_aquires_lock() EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION(mu) {
+    mu.Lock();
+    return foo;
+  }
+  
+  const Foo &returns_constref_shared_locks_required() SHARED_LOCKS_REQUIRED(mu) {
+    return foo;
+  }
+  
+  Foo *returns_ptr() {
+    return &foo;              // FIXME -- Do we want to warn on this ?
+  }
+
+  Foo &returns_ref2() {
+    return *foo_ptr;          // expected-warning {{returning the value that 'foo_ptr' points to by reference requires holding mutex 'mu' exclusively}}
+  }
+
+};
+
 
 }  // end namespace PassByRefTest
 

@legrosbuffle
Copy link
Contributor Author

@aeubanks FYI

def ThreadSafetyAnalysis : DiagGroup<"thread-safety-analysis">;
def ThreadSafetyPrecise : DiagGroup<"thread-safety-precise">;
def ThreadSafetyReference : DiagGroup<"thread-safety-reference">;
def ThreadSafetyReferenceReturn : DiagGroup<"thread-safety-reference-return">;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it's fine to put this in ThreadSafety and have it on by default (which it should be because it's improving thread safety analysis) since now people can turn it off with -Wno-thread-safety-reference while cleaning up their codebase

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done, thanks.

@legrosbuffle legrosbuffle force-pushed the ts-return branch 3 times, most recently from 2d90dc0 to db86804 Compare October 17, 2023 07:01
Copy link
Contributor

@aeubanks aeubanks left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the flag changes lgtm and the remaining code was already reviews, so push it!

Copy link
Member

@aaronpuchert aaronpuchert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Assuming that this is otherwise identical to the Phab review. I would suggest to add some release notes (in a separate change).

Comment on lines 1064 to 1066
def ThreadSafetyAttributes : DiagGroup<"thread-safety-attributes">;
def ThreadSafetyAnalysis : DiagGroup<"thread-safety-analysis">;
def ThreadSafetyPrecise : DiagGroup<"thread-safety-precise">;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would suggest to undo the indentation changes here, as the flag is intended to be temporary.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done.

@@ -2278,7 +2303,7 @@ void ThreadSafetyAnalyzer::runAnalysis(AnalysisDeclContext &AC) {
PostOrderCFGView::CFGBlockSet VisitedBlocks(CFGraph);

CFGBlockInfo &Initial = BlockInfo[CFGraph->getEntry().getBlockID()];
CFGBlockInfo &Final = BlockInfo[CFGraph->getExit().getBlockID()];
CFGBlockInfo &Final = BlockInfo[CFGraph->getExit().getBlockID()];
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change seems unnecessary, but I don't mind either way.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done.

llvm#68394)"

The new warnings are now under a separate flag `-Wthread-safety-reference-return`, which is on by default under `-Wthread-safety-reference`.

 - People can opt out via `-Wthread-safety-reference -Wnothread-safety-reference-return`.

This reverts commit 859f2d0.
@legrosbuffle legrosbuffle merged commit 39427b1 into llvm:main Oct 19, 2023
aarongable pushed a commit to chromium/chromium that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2023
…return

llvm/llvm-project#68572 refined the new functionality under a flag.

Bug: 1490607
Change-Id: Ib2b47dc5a825e189dc4f20a242e64f2501dfe03b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4966766
Commit-Queue: Arthur Eubanks <[email protected]>
Auto-Submit: Arthur Eubanks <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Hans Wennborg <[email protected]>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1213677}
UI-RayanWang pushed a commit to ubiquiti/ubnt_libjingle_component_src_build that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2023
…return

llvm/llvm-project#68572 refined the new functionality under a flag.

Bug: 1490607
Change-Id: Ib2b47dc5a825e189dc4f20a242e64f2501dfe03b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4966766
Commit-Queue: Arthur Eubanks <[email protected]>
Auto-Submit: Arthur Eubanks <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Hans Wennborg <[email protected]>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1213677}
NOKEYCHECK=True
GitOrigin-RevId: 9f40a21c4abea603d74a445e37044c07c157b316
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
clang:analysis clang:dataflow Clang Dataflow Analysis framework - https://clang.llvm.org/docs/DataFlowAnalysisIntro.html clang:frontend Language frontend issues, e.g. anything involving "Sema" clang Clang issues not falling into any other category
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants