Development: Migrate account module to Angular lazy standalone component
#9378
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve significant modifications to the user account management features within an Angular application. Key updates include the deletion of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
github-actions
bot
added
the
client
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 17
🧹 Outside diff range comments (17)
src/main/webapp/app/account/register/register.service.ts (1)
Line range hint
10-20: LGTM: Thesavemethod is well-implemented and documented.The method follows Angular best practices and uses Observables correctly for HTTP requests. The JSDoc comments provide clear documentation of the method's purpose and parameters.
Consider adding error handling to improve the robustness of the service:
save(account: User): Observable<void> { return this.http.post<void>('api/public/register', account).pipe( catchError((error) => { console.error('Error registering user:', error); return throwError(() => new Error('Registration failed. Please try again.')); }) ); }Don't forget to import
catchErrorandthrowErrorfrom 'rxjs' if you implement this suggestion.src/main/webapp/app/account/password-reset/external/external-user-password-reset-modal.component.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-24: LGTM: Overall structure maintained with successful migration to standalone component.The component has been successfully migrated to a standalone component while maintaining its original functionality. The
clearmethod correctly uses the injectedactiveModal.Consider the following enhancements to align more closely with the PR objectives:
- Implement lazy loading for this component if it's not already set up in the parent module.
- Add integration tests to ensure high test coverage for this feature.
- Verify that the component is responsive and performs well with large datasets, as mentioned in the PR objectives.
- Ensure that necessary authorities are set up for the routes that use this component.
src/main/webapp/app/shared/layouts/profiles/page-ribbon.component.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-33: Consider converting to a standalone componentThe component generally follows the coding guidelines well. However, to align with the PR objective of migrating to Angular standalone components, consider refactoring this component to be standalone.
Here's how you can convert this to a standalone component:
- Add the
standalone: trueproperty to the@Componentdecorator.- Import necessary dependencies (like
CommonModulefor@ifdirective).- Use the new
injectfunction for dependency injection instead of constructor injection.Here's an example of how the refactored component could look:
import { Component, OnInit } from '@angular/core'; import { CommonModule } from '@angular/common'; import { inject } from '@angular/core'; import { ProfileService } from 'app/shared/layouts/profiles/profile.service'; @Component({ selector: 'jhi-page-ribbon', standalone: true, imports: [CommonModule], template: ` <div class="box"> @if (ribbonEnv) { <div class="ribbon ribbon-top-left"> <span jhiTranslate="global.ribbon.{{ ribbonEnv }}">{{ ribbonEnv }}</span> </div> } </div> `, styleUrls: ['page-ribbon.scss'], }) export class PageRibbonComponent implements OnInit { ribbonEnv: string; private profileService = inject(ProfileService); ngOnInit() { this.profileService.getProfileInfo().subscribe((profileInfo) => { if (profileInfo) { if (profileInfo.inDevelopment) { this.ribbonEnv = 'dev'; } else if (profileInfo.inProduction && profileInfo.testServer) { this.ribbonEnv = 'test'; } } }); } }This refactoring aligns with the PR's goal of migrating to standalone components and utilizing the new
injectfunctionality.src/main/webapp/app/account/activate/activate.component.ts (2)
Line range hint
24-36: Suggest type improvement in ngOnInit methodThe
ngOnInitmethod logic looks good and aligns with the PR objectives. To enhance type safety and code clarity, consider adding a type for theprofileInfoparameter in the subscribe callback.ngOnInit() { this.profileService.getProfileInfo().subscribe((profileInfo: { registrationEnabled?: boolean }) => { if (profileInfo) { this.isRegistrationEnabled = profileInfo.registrationEnabled || false; if (this.isRegistrationEnabled) { this.activateAccount(); } } }); }This change will make the code more robust and self-documenting.
Line range hint
38-43: Suggest improvement in error handling for activateAccount methodThe
activateAccountmethod effectively uses RxJS operators, which is great. However, the error handling could be enhanced to provide more detailed feedback and potentially log the error for debugging purposes.Consider modifying the error handling as follows:
activateAccount() { this.route.queryParams.pipe(mergeMap((params) => this.activateService.get(params.key))).subscribe({ next: () => (this.success = true), error: (err) => { this.error = true; console.error('Account activation failed:', err); // Optionally, you could add more specific error handling here }, }); }This change will help in debugging and potentially provide more informative error messages to the user in the future.
src/main/webapp/app/account/password/password.component.ts (2)
Line range hint
41-53: Form initialization remains robustThe
initializeFormmethod continues to use reactive forms effectively with appropriate validators. This aligns well with Angular best practices.Consider adding type annotations to improve type safety:
private initializeForm(): void { if (this.passwordForm) { return; } this.passwordForm = this.fb.nonNullable.group({ currentPassword: ['', [Validators.required]], newPassword: ['', [Validators.required, Validators.minLength(PASSWORD_MIN_LENGTH), Validators.maxLength(PASSWORD_MAX_LENGTH)]], confirmPassword: ['', [Validators.required, Validators.minLength(PASSWORD_MIN_LENGTH), Validators.maxLength(PASSWORD_MAX_LENGTH)]], }); }
Line range hint
55-75: Password change logic remains effectiveThe
changePasswordmethod continues to handle the password change process effectively, including proper error handling and service interaction.To improve code clarity, consider extracting the password comparison logic into a separate method:
private passwordsMatch(): boolean { const newPassword = this.passwordForm.get(['newPassword'])!.value; const confirmPassword = this.passwordForm.get(['confirmPassword'])!.value; return newPassword === confirmPassword; } changePassword() { this.error = false; this.success = false; this.doNotMatch = false; if (!this.passwordsMatch()) { this.doNotMatch = true; return; } this.passwordService.save( this.passwordForm.get(['newPassword'])!.value, this.passwordForm.get(['currentPassword'])!.value ).subscribe({ next: () => (this.success = true), error: () => (this.error = true), }); }This refactoring improves readability and adheres to the single responsibility principle.
src/main/webapp/app/account/password-reset/finish/password-reset-finish.component.ts (3)
Line range hint
43-54: LGTM: Proper form initialization and validationThe form initialization and validation are well-implemented:
- FormBuilder is used correctly for creating the form group.
- Validators are properly applied to form controls.
- Constants are used for password length validation, which is good for maintainability.
Consider using a custom validator for password strength to enhance security. For example:
import { AbstractControl, ValidationErrors, ValidatorFn } from '@angular/forms'; export function createPasswordStrengthValidator(): ValidatorFn { return (control: AbstractControl): ValidationErrors | null => { const value = control.value; if (!value) { return null; } const hasUpperCase = /[A-Z]+/.test(value); const hasLowerCase = /[a-z]+/.test(value); const hasNumeric = /[0-9]+/.test(value); const passwordValid = hasUpperCase && hasLowerCase && hasNumeric; return !passwordValid ? { passwordStrength: true } : null; } } // In the component: this.passwordForm = this.fb.nonNullable.group({ newPassword: ['', [Validators.required, Validators.minLength(PASSWORD_MIN_LENGTH), Validators.maxLength(PASSWORD_MAX_LENGTH), createPasswordStrengthValidator()]], // ... });This would ensure that passwords meet certain complexity requirements.
Line range hint
63-78: LGTM: Proper implementation of password reset functionalityThe password reset functionality is well-implemented:
- Password match check is performed before making the service call.
- The service call is correctly made using observables.
- Basic error handling is in place.
Consider enhancing the error handling to provide more specific error messages. For example:
finishReset(): void { this.doNotMatch = false; this.error = false; this.errorMessage = ''; const newPassword = this.passwordForm.get(['newPassword'])!.value; const confirmPassword = this.passwordForm.get(['confirmPassword'])!.value; if (newPassword !== confirmPassword) { this.doNotMatch = true; this.errorMessage = 'ERROR.PASSWORD_NOT_MATCHING'; } else { this.passwordResetFinishService.save(this.key, newPassword).subscribe({ next: () => (this.success = true), error: (err) => { this.error = true; this.errorMessage = err.error?.message || 'ERROR.RESET_FAILED'; }, }); } }This would provide more detailed feedback to the user and improve the user experience.
Line range hint
1-79: Overall: Well-implemented standalone component with good practicesThe PasswordResetFinishComponent is well-structured and follows Angular best practices:
- Proper use of standalone component syntax.
- Correct implementation of lifecycle hooks (OnInit, AfterViewInit).
- Adherence to naming conventions and Angular style guide.
- Appropriate use of reactive forms and validators.
- Integration with translation system (TranslateDirective).
The component successfully achieves the PR objective of migrating to a standalone component while maintaining its functionality. It demonstrates good code organization and follows the principle of separation of concerns.
To further improve the component's architecture and maintainability:
- Consider extracting the form logic into a separate form service or custom form control.
- Implement comprehensive unit tests to ensure the component's reliability.
- Use NgRx or a similar state management solution if the application scales and requires more complex state handling.
src/main/webapp/app/account/password/password-strength-bar.component.ts (1)
Line range hint
27-85: Consider optimizing password strength calculation and UI updates.The existing logic for password strength calculation and UI updates is functional. However, there are opportunities for improvement:
Performance: The
measureStrengthmethod recalculates strength on every input change. Consider debouncing this operation for better performance with large datasets.Readability: The
getColormethod could be simplified using a switch statement or a lookup table.Accessibility: Ensure that the color-based strength indication is supplemented with text-based feedback for users with color vision deficiencies.
Here's a suggestion for improving the
getColormethod:private strengthLevels = [ { maxScore: 10, color: '#F00' }, { maxScore: 20, color: '#F90' }, { maxScore: 30, color: '#FF0' }, { maxScore: 40, color: '#9F0' }, { maxScore: Infinity, color: '#0F0' } ]; getColor(s: number): { idx: number; color: string } { const level = this.strengthLevels.find(level => s <= level.maxScore); const idx = this.strengthLevels.indexOf(level); return { idx: idx + 1, color: level.color }; }This approach is more declarative and easier to maintain.
src/main/webapp/app/account/settings/settings.component.ts (2)
Line range hint
50-61: Well-structured form initialization!The separation of form initialization into a dedicated method improves code organization. The use of explicit typing for form control initial values enhances type safety. The validation rules are comprehensive and align with best practices.
Consider adding error handling for the case where
initializeForm()is called whensettingsFormis already initialized:private initializeForm() { if (this.settingsForm) { console.warn('Form already initialized'); return; } // ... rest of the method }
Line range hint
66-88: Effective implementation of account saving functionality!The
save()method is well-structured and follows the coding guidelines. It efficiently updates the account object and handles the server response, including updating the authenticated user and changing the language when necessary. This implementation aligns with the PR objective of ensuring a responsive UI and minimizing unnecessary REST calls.Consider enhancing the error handling to provide more informative feedback to the user:
error: (err) => { this.success = false; console.error('Error saving account settings:', err); // TODO: Add user-friendly error message display },src/main/webapp/app/account/password-reset/init/password-reset-init.component.ts (2)
Line range hint
34-50: LGTM! Consider adding error handling to the subscription.The
ngOnInitmethod correctly uses the injected services and maintains the existing logic for handling profile information and language-specific links.Consider adding error handling to the subscription to handle potential issues when fetching profile information:
ngOnInit() { this.profileService.getProfileInfo().subscribe({ next: (profileInfo) => { if (profileInfo) { // Existing logic... } }, error: (error) => { console.error('Error fetching profile info:', error); this.alertService.error('error.loading.profile'); } }); }
Line range hint
58-78: LGTM! Consider enhancing input validation.The
requestResetmethod correctly uses injected services and handles various scenarios, including external user cases. The error handling and modal display logic are well-implemented.Consider enhancing the input validation for the email/username field. You could add a more robust check, such as a regex pattern for email validation:
requestReset(): void { const emailRegex = /^[a-zA-Z0-9._%+-]+@[a-zA-Z0-9.-]+\.[a-zA-Z]{2,}$/; if (!this.emailUsernameValue || (this.emailUsernameValue.includes('@') && !emailRegex.test(this.emailUsernameValue))) { this.alertService.error('reset.request.messages.invalidInput'); return; } // Rest of the method... }This would provide more specific feedback to users if they enter an invalid email address.
src/main/webapp/app/account/register/register.component.ts (2)
Line range hint
52-85: LGTM! Consider moving form initialization to the constructor.The implementation of
ngOnInitandinitializeFormmethods is well-structured and follows Angular best practices. The use ofprofileServicealigns with the PR objectives for minimizing unnecessary REST calls.Consider moving the form initialization to the constructor for better performance:
export class RegisterComponent implements OnInit, AfterViewInit { private translateService = inject(TranslateService); private registerService = inject(RegisterService); private fb = inject(FormBuilder); private profileService = inject(ProfileService); registerForm = this.initializeForm(); // ... other properties ... private initializeForm(): FormGroup { return this.fb.nonNullable.group({ firstName: ['', [Validators.required, Validators.minLength(2)]], lastName: ['', [Validators.required, Validators.minLength(2)]], login: ['', [Validators.required, Validators.minLength(USERNAME_MIN_LENGTH), Validators.maxLength(USERNAME_MAX_LENGTH), Validators.pattern(this.usernamePattern)]], email: ['', [Validators.required, Validators.minLength(5), Validators.maxLength(100), Validators.email]], password: ['', [Validators.required, Validators.minLength(PASSWORD_MIN_LENGTH), Validators.maxLength(PASSWORD_MAX_LENGTH)]], confirmPassword: ['', [Validators.required, Validators.minLength(PASSWORD_MIN_LENGTH), Validators.maxLength(PASSWORD_MAX_LENGTH)]], }); } ngOnInit() { this.profileService.getProfileInfo().subscribe((profileInfo) => { if (profileInfo) { this.isRegistrationEnabled = profileInfo.registrationEnabled || false; this.allowedEmailPattern = profileInfo.allowedEmailPattern; this.allowedEmailPatternReadable = profileInfo.allowedEmailPatternReadable; if (this.allowedEmailPattern) { const jsRegexPattern = this.allowedEmailPattern; this.registerForm.get('email')!.setValidators([Validators.required, Validators.minLength(4), Validators.maxLength(100), Validators.pattern(jsRegexPattern)]); } } }); } // ... rest of the component ... }This approach ensures that the form is initialized immediately when the component is created, potentially improving performance.
Line range hint
87-134: LGTM! Consider using a switch statement for error handling.The
registerandprocessErrormethods are well-implemented, following Angular best practices for form handling and error processing. The use ofTranslateServicefor the language key aligns with the localization requirement in the coding guidelines.Consider using a switch statement in the
processErrormethod for better readability:private processError(response: HttpErrorResponse): void { if (response.status === 400) { switch (true) { case response.error.type.includes(LOGIN_ALREADY_USED_TYPE): this.errorUserExists = true; break; case response.error.type.includes(EMAIL_ALREADY_USED_TYPE): this.errorEmailExists = true; break; case response.error.type.includes(ACCOUNT_REGISTRATION_BLOCKED): this.errorAccountRegistrationBlocked = true; break; default: this.error = true; } } else { this.error = true; } }This approach may improve the readability and maintainability of the error handling logic.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (19)
- src/main/webapp/app/account/account.module.ts (0 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/account/account.route.ts (0 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/account/activate/activate.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/account/activate/activate.service.ts (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/account/password-reset/external/external-user-password-reset-modal.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/account/password-reset/finish/password-reset-finish.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/account/password-reset/finish/password-reset-finish.service.ts (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/account/password-reset/init/password-reset-init.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/account/password-reset/init/password-reset-init.service.ts (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/account/password/password-strength-bar.component.ts (2 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/account/password/password.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/account/password/password.service.ts (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/account/register/register.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/account/register/register.service.ts (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/account/settings/settings.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/app-routing.module.ts (5 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/layouts/profiles/page-ribbon.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/layouts/profiles/profile-info.model.ts (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/layouts/profiles/profile.service.ts (1 hunks)
💤 Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (2)
- src/main/webapp/app/account/account.module.ts
- src/main/webapp/app/account/account.route.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (17)
src/main/webapp/app/account/activate/activate.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/account/activate/activate.service.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/account/password-reset/external/external-user-password-reset-modal.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/account/password-reset/finish/password-reset-finish.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/account/password-reset/finish/password-reset-finish.service.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/account/password-reset/init/password-reset-init.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/account/password-reset/init/password-reset-init.service.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/account/password/password-strength-bar.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/account/password/password.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/account/password/password.service.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/account/register/register.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/account/register/register.service.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/account/settings/settings.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/app-routing.module.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/layouts/profiles/page-ribbon.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/layouts/profiles/profile-info.model.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/layouts/profiles/profile.service.ts (1)
🔇 Additional comments (34)
src/main/webapp/app/account/password-reset/init/password-reset-init.service.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The import statement has been appropriately updated to include the
injectfunction from '@angular/core'. This change aligns with the migration to standalone components and modern Angular practices.
Line range hint
1-13: Overall, the changes improve the service implementation.The migration to use the
injectfunction for dependency injection is well-implemented. The file adheres to Angular style guidelines and best practices, including:
- Proper use of decorators
- Correct naming conventions
- Single responsibility principle
- Lazy loading through
providedIn: 'root'The
savemethod remains unchanged and correctly returns anObservable<object>. The service is concise and focused on its primary functionality of initiating a password reset.src/main/webapp/app/account/password-reset/finish/password-reset-finish.service.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The import statement has been appropriately updated to include the
injectfunction from '@angular/core'. This change is consistent with the new dependency injection method used in the class and follows the Angular style guide.
Line range hint
1-13: Summary: Successful migration to modern Angular practices.The changes in this file effectively update the
PasswordResetFinishServiceto use Angular's modern dependency injection method with theinjectfunction. This modification:
- Simplifies the code by removing the need for a constructor.
- Maintains the existing functionality of the service.
- Adheres to the provided coding guidelines.
These changes contribute to the overall objective of migrating the account module to Angular lazy standalone components, as mentioned in the PR objectives.
To ensure that this change doesn't introduce any unintended side effects, please run the following verification script:
This script will help identify any places where the service is used and ensure that no other services in the account module are still using constructor-based injection for HttpClient.
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful
The
PasswordResetFinishServiceis correctly utilized throughout the application, and no constructor-based injections ofHttpClientremain in the account module. The migration to theinjectfunction has been successfully validated without introducing any unintended side effects.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the PasswordResetFinishService is still being used correctly throughout the application. # Test: Search for usages of PasswordResetFinishService rg --type typescript "PasswordResetFinishService" # Test: Check for any remaining constructor-based injections of HttpClient in the account module rg --type typescript "constructor\(.*HttpClient" src/main/webapp/app/accountLength of output: 198
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the PasswordResetFinishService is still being used correctly throughout the application. # Test: Search for usages of PasswordResetFinishService in .ts files rg "PasswordResetFinishService" --glob "*.ts" # Test: Check for any remaining constructor-based injections of HttpClient in the account module rg "constructor\s*\(.*HttpClient" src/main/webapp/app/account --glob "*.ts"Length of output: 1312
src/main/webapp/app/account/activate/activate.service.ts (3)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The import statement has been properly updated to include the
injectfunction from '@angular/core'. This change aligns with the PR objective of migrating to Angular's newinjectfunctionality and follows the coding guidelines for using single quotes for strings.
7-7: Excellent: Dependency injection updated to useinjectfunction.The change from constructor-based injection to using the
injectfunction simplifies the code and aligns with Angular's modern practices. This update:
- Reduces boilerplate code by eliminating the need for a constructor.
- Promotes lazy loading, as dependencies are injected when needed.
- Adheres to the coding guidelines (camelCase for properties, no private prefix).
- Enhances code reusability and maintainability.
Great job on implementing this improvement!
Line range hint
1-18: Great job: File structure and coding guidelines well-maintained.The overall structure of the file adheres excellently to Angular style guidelines and the provided coding instructions:
- The
@Injectabledecorator is correctly used withprovidedIn: 'root'.- Consistent use of 4-space indentation throughout the file.
- Single quotes for strings, as per guidelines.
- The class name
ActivateServicefollows PascalCase convention.- The
getmethod is well-documented with a JSDoc comment and uses proper type annotations.The file maintains a clean and consistent structure while incorporating the new dependency injection method. Well done!
src/main/webapp/app/account/password/password.service.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The import statement has been updated to include
injectfrom '@angular/core', which aligns with Angular's modern practices for standalone components and dependency injection. The use of single quotes for the import path adheres to the project's coding guidelines.
Line range hint
1-20: LGTM: Overall structure and functionality of the service are well-maintained.The
PasswordServicemaintains its core functionality while adopting modern Angular practices:
- The
@Injectabledecorator withprovidedIn: 'root'ensures application-wide availability.- The
savemethod adheres to coding guidelines:
- Arrow function syntax
- Proper indentation (4 spaces)
- Single quotes for strings
- camelCase for method and parameter naming
- The HTTP call in the
savemethod is concise and follows best practices.These aspects contribute to a well-structured and maintainable service.
src/main/webapp/app/account/register/register.service.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statements are correct and follow Angular guidelines.The addition of the
injectimport from '@angular/core' is appropriate for the new dependency injection method used in the service.
Line range hint
1-20: Overall assessment: Excellent implementation of the RegisterService.The changes in this file successfully migrate the
RegisterServiceto use Angular's newinjectfunctionality, aligning with the PR objectives. The code adheres to Angular style guidelines, follows best practices for dependency injection, and maintains a clean, readable structure. The service is well-documented and efficiently implements the registration functionality.The changes contribute to the overall goal of enhancing the account module and improving code quality. Great job on this implementation!
src/main/webapp/app/account/password-reset/external/external-user-password-reset-modal.component.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statements updated correctly.The import statements have been appropriately updated to support the migration to a standalone component. The addition of
TranslateDirectivealigns with the localization requirement, andArtemisSharedModulepromotes code reuse as per our guidelines.Also applies to: 3-4
13-13: LGTM: Dependency injection updated correctly.The
NgbActiveModalservice is now correctly injected using theinjectfunction, aligning with the migration to standalone components. The use of the private modifier without a prefix adheres to our coding guidelines.src/main/webapp/app/account/activate/activate.component.ts (2)
16-18: Approve dependency injection changesThe transition to using the
injectfunction for dependency injection is a positive change. It aligns with modern Angular practices and contributes to making the component standalone. The property naming conventions are correctly following camelCase as per the coding guidelines.
Line range hint
1-43: Summary of ActivateComponent reviewThe migration of
ActivateComponentto a standalone component has been successfully implemented. The changes align well with the PR objectives and coding guidelines, particularly in terms of using modern Angular features likeinjectfor dependency injection and maintaining a modular structure.Key points:
- Successful implementation of standalone component configuration.
- Proper use of
injectfor dependency injection.- Maintained existing logic while improving the overall structure.
Minor suggestions have been made to further enhance the code:
- Organizing imports for better readability.
- Improving type safety in the
ngOnInitmethod.- Enhancing error handling in the
activateAccountmethod.Overall, this is a well-executed update that improves the component's modularity and maintainability.
src/main/webapp/app/shared/layouts/profiles/profile-info.model.ts (1)
10-10: Verify usage of the newinDevelopmentpropertyThe addition of the
inDevelopmentproperty to theProfileInfoclass is a good enhancement. To ensure its proper integration:
- Verify that this property is correctly set when initializing
ProfileInfoobjects.- Check if there are any places in the application where this new property should be used instead of (or in addition to) the existing
inProductionproperty.To help with this verification, you can run the following script:
This will help identify areas where the new
inDevelopmentproperty might be relevant.✅ Verification successful
Verification of
inDevelopmentProperty Usage CompleteThe
inDevelopmentproperty has been correctly integrated into theProfileInfomodel and is appropriately utilized within the application:
- Declaration: Defined in
src/main/webapp/app/shared/layouts/profiles/profile-info.model.ts.- Usage in Components:
page-ribbon.component.ts: Determines the environment ribbon based oninDevelopment.- Assignment in Services:
profile.service.ts: SetsinDevelopmentbased on active profiles.No issues were found with the integration or usage of the
inDevelopmentproperty.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of ProfileInfo and inProduction echo "Searching for ProfileInfo usages:" rg --type typescript "ProfileInfo" -A 5 echo "Searching for inProduction usages:" rg --type typescript "inProduction" -A 5Length of output: 306
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of ProfileInfo and inProduction without specifying file type echo "Searching for ProfileInfo usages:" rg "ProfileInfo" -A 5 echo "Searching for inProduction usages:" rg "inProduction" -A 5Length of output: 205627
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of inDevelopment echo "Searching for inDevelopment usages:" rg "inDevelopment" -A 5Length of output: 2091
src/main/webapp/app/account/password/password.component.ts (3)
1-16: Excellent migration to standalone component!The changes to import statements and component decorator successfully implement the standalone component approach. This aligns well with the PR objectives of migrating to Angular's new
standalonefunctionality. The direct imports of necessary modules in the@Componentdecorator improve modularity and can potentially enhance lazy loading capabilities, contributing to better performance.
Line range hint
24-39: Existing implementation remains solidThe unchanged segment of the component, including properties and the
ngOnInitmethod, continues to follow Angular best practices. The use of optional chaining inuser?.internalis a good approach for null safety.
Line range hint
1-75: Summary: Successful migration to standalone component with performance improvementsThe changes in this file effectively achieve the PR objective of migrating the account module to an Angular lazy standalone component. The implementation:
- Utilizes the new
standaloneandinjectfunctionalities as intended.- Maintains the existing functionality while improving modularity and potential for lazy loading.
- Adheres to Angular best practices and the provided coding guidelines.
- Contributes to performance improvements by enabling more efficient lazy loading.
The code demonstrates attention to detail in terms of error handling, form validation, and responsive design considerations. While the core password change functionality remains unchanged, the structural improvements align well with the goals of enhancing performance and maintainability.
To fully meet the PR objectives, ensure that:
- Integration tests cover the password change functionality.
- The changes don't negatively impact the exam mode (if applicable to this component).
- The component works well with both light and dark themes.
Great job on this migration! The suggested minor improvements will further enhance code quality and maintainability.
src/main/webapp/app/account/password-reset/finish/password-reset-finish.component.ts (1)
1-15: LGTM: Proper setup for standalone componentThe changes to imports and the component decorator are well-implemented:
- Imports are organized correctly and follow the Angular style guide.
- The component is properly set up as a standalone component.
- Necessary dependencies are correctly imported in the component decorator.
These changes align with the PR objective of migrating to Angular standalone components.
src/main/webapp/app/account/password/password-strength-bar.component.ts (1)
22-23: LGTM! Effective use of new inject API.The migration to using the
injectfunction for dependency injection is well implemented. This change aligns with modern Angular practices and the PR objectives.src/main/webapp/app/account/settings/settings.component.ts (2)
1-2: Excellent migration to standalone component!The changes to imports and the component decorator successfully implement Angular's standalone component feature. This aligns well with the PR objective of migrating the account module to utilize Angular's new
standalonefunctionality. The explicit imports enhance modularity and support lazy loading, which can improve application performance.Also applies to: 8-10, 15-16
Line range hint
1-88: Overall excellent migration to standalone component with improved dependency injection!The
SettingsComponenthas been successfully migrated to utilize Angular's standalone component feature and the newinjectfunctionality for dependency injection. These changes align perfectly with the PR objectives and follow the provided coding guidelines.Key improvements:
- Enhanced modularity and potential for lazy loading
- Cleaner dependency injection using
inject- Well-structured form initialization and validation
- Effective implementation of account saving functionality
The suggested minor improvements for consistency and error handling will further enhance the code quality. Great job on this migration!
src/main/webapp/app/account/password-reset/init/password-reset-init.component.ts (2)
22-26: LGTM! Effective use of theinjectfunction for dependency injection.The migration from constructor injection to using the
injectfunction is well-implemented. This change aligns with modern Angular practices and the PR objectives.
Line range hint
1-79: Great job on migrating to a standalone component!The
PasswordResetInitComponenthas been successfully migrated to a standalone component, effectively utilizing Angular's newstandaloneandinjectfunctionalities. The changes align well with the PR objectives and maintain the existing functionality while improving the component's structure and modularity.Key improvements:
- Standalone component declaration
- Use of
injectfunction for dependency injection- Proper import of necessary modules in the component decorator
The component adheres to Angular style guidelines and best practices, contributing to a more modular and maintainable codebase.
src/main/webapp/app/account/register/register.component.ts (2)
22-25: LGTM! Excellent use of theinjectfunction for dependency injection.The migration from constructor-based dependency injection to using the
injectfunction is well-implemented. This change simplifies the component code and aligns with modern Angular practices.
Line range hint
27-50: LGTM! Existing code follows Angular best practices.The component properties and lifecycle methods remain well-structured and follow Angular best practices. No issues found in these unchanged sections.
src/main/webapp/app/app-routing.module.ts (7)
3-4: Added imports for route access controlThe imports for
UserRouteAccessServiceandAuthorityare correctly added to manage route access based on user roles and authorities.
19-21: Added pageTitle to the home routeIncluding the
pageTitlein the home route'sdataproperty ensures the correct display of the page title, which enhances user experience and supports localization.
49-105: Migrated account routes to lazy-loaded standalone componentsThe 'account' routes have been refactored to use lazy-loaded standalone components via
loadComponent, aligning with Angular best practices for lazy loading. Proper route guards are implemented usingUserRouteAccessServiceandauthorities, which enhances security by restricting access to authenticated users where necessary.
141-141: Migrated ProblemStatementComponent to lazy loadingThe
ProblemStatementComponentis now lazy-loaded usingloadComponent, which improves application performance by reducing the initial bundle size.
146-146: Migrated ProblemStatementComponent for participation-specific routeThe route handling the problem statement with
participationIdnow correctly lazy-loadsProblemStatementComponent, ensuring consistency in how components are loaded throughout the application.
151-151: Migrated StandaloneFeedbackComponent to lazy loadingThe
StandaloneFeedbackComponentis now lazy-loaded, which optimizes performance and adheres to the lazy loading practices specified in the coding guidelines.
179-179: Migrated AboutIrisComponent to lazy loadingThe
AboutIrisComponenthas been updated to use lazy loading withloadComponent, enhancing modularity and reducing the initial load time of the application.
src/main/webapp/app/account/password-reset/init/password-reset-init.service.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/webapp/app/account/password-reset/finish/password-reset-finish.service.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...n/webapp/app/account/password-reset/external/external-user-password-reset-modal.component.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/webapp/app/account/password-reset/init/password-reset-init.component.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/account/activate.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/account/password.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
src/test/javascript/spec/component/account/activate.component.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}src/test/javascript/spec/component/account/password.component.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/test/javascript/spec/component/account/activate.component.spec.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-78: Great job adhering to coding guidelines!The test file follows the specified coding guidelines well:
- Uses Jest for testing
- Employs mocks for dependencies (MockActivatedRoute, MockSyncStorage, MockProfileService)
- Uses specific expectation methods (toBeTrue(), toBeFalse(), toHaveBeenCalledWith())
- Avoids full module imports and NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA
- Tests are specific and focused
Line range hint
1-78: Excellent test coverage and implementation!The tests thoroughly cover the component's functionality, including:
- Successful activation
- Activation failure
- Correct parameter passing
- Proper error handling
The use of
fakeAsyncandtick()for handling asynchronous operations is well implemented. Overall, this is a well-structured and comprehensive test file.src/test/javascript/spec/component/account/password.component.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-138: Overall, the test file is well-structured and comprehensive.The test suite covers various scenarios for the PasswordComponent, including password mismatch, successful password change, and error handling. The use of Jest and the expectation syntax aligns with the provided guidelines. The tests appear to be thorough and should provide good coverage for the component's functionality.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range comments (4)
src/test/javascript/spec/component/account/settings.component.spec.ts (3)
Line range hint
76-76: Enhance expectation specificityConsider using
toBeTrue()instead oftoBe(true)for boolean expectations, as per the coding guidelines.Replace the expectation with:
expect(comp.success).toBeTrue();
Line range hint
97-97: Enhance expectation specificityConsider using
toBeFalse()instead oftoBe(false)for boolean expectations, as per the coding guidelines.Replace the expectation with:
expect(comp.success).toBeFalse();
Line range hint
66-69: Use recommended spy call assertionsThe coding guidelines suggest using
toHaveBeenCalledOnce()for checking if a method was called exactly once. Consider updating the expectations to align with this recommendation.Replace the expectations with:
expect(service.identity).toHaveBeenCalledOnce(); expect(service.save).toHaveBeenCalledOnce(); expect(service.authenticate).toHaveBeenCalledOnce();src/test/javascript/spec/component/account/password-reset-finish.component.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint
76-96: Suggestion: Update deprecatedinjectusage and improve test specificity.Consider the following improvements:
- Replace the deprecated
injectfunction withTestBed.inject.- Use a more specific error type in the error handling test.
- Use
toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWithfor more precise assertions.Here's an example of how you could refactor this test:
it('should update success to true after resetting password', fakeAsync(() => { const service = TestBed.inject(PasswordResetFinishService); jest.spyOn(service, 'save').mockReturnValue(of({})); comp.passwordForm.patchValue({ newPassword: 'password', confirmPassword: 'password', }); comp.finishReset(); tick(); expect(service.save).toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith('XYZPDQ', 'password'); expect(comp.success).toBeTrue(); })); it('should notify of generic error', fakeAsync(() => { const service = TestBed.inject(PasswordResetFinishService); jest.spyOn(service, 'save').mockReturnValue(throwError(() => new Error('Specific error message'))); comp.passwordForm.patchValue({ newPassword: 'password', confirmPassword: 'password', }); comp.finishReset(); tick(); expect(service.save).toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith('XYZPDQ', 'password'); expect(comp.success).toBeFalse(); expect(comp.error).toBeTrue(); }));
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/account/password-reset-finish.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/account/register.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/account/settings.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
src/test/javascript/spec/component/account/password-reset-finish.component.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}src/test/javascript/spec/component/account/register.component.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}src/test/javascript/spec/component/account/settings.component.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/test/javascript/spec/component/account/settings.component.spec.ts (2)
35-35: Approved: Correct removal of redundant importThe removal of
SettingsComponentfrom theimportsarray is correct and aligns with Angular testing best practices. This change eliminates redundancy, as the component is already present in thedeclarationsarray (implied byTestBed.createComponent(SettingsComponent)usage later in the file).This modification helps prevent potential errors that can occur when a component is both declared and imported in the same testing module.
Line range hint
1-99: Overall assessment: Good test implementation with minor improvement opportunitiesThe test file for
SettingsComponentis well-structured and follows most of the coding guidelines. The main change (removal of redundant import) is correct and improves the test setup. A few minor suggestions have been made to enhance expectation specificity and align spy call assertions with the recommended solutions in the guidelines. These small improvements will further increase the quality and maintainability of the test suite.src/test/javascript/spec/component/account/password-reset-finish.component.spec.ts (1)
23-23: Approve change to standalone component import.The modification to import
PasswordResetFinishComponentinstead of declaring it is correct and aligns with the migration to standalone components mentioned in the PR objectives.To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following script to check if other component tests have been similarly updated:
✅ Verification successful
Adjusting the verification script to ensure accurate pattern matching.
Please run the following updated script to verify consistency in component test imports across the codebase:
Verified consistency of standalone component imports across tests.
All component test files, including
PasswordResetFinishComponent, have been appropriately updated to use imports instead of declarations. This confirms that the migration to standalone components is consistently applied throughout the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistency in component test imports across the codebase # Test: Search for similar patterns in other component test files rg --type typescript -g 'src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.spec.ts' 'imports: \[.*Component\]' # Note: If this returns results, it indicates other components have been similarly updated. # If it doesn't return results, it might indicate inconsistency in the migration process.Length of output: 127
Script:
# #!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistency in component test imports across the codebase # Corrected Test: Search for similar patterns in other component test files without using the unsupported --type option rg -g 'src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.spec.ts' 'imports: \[.*Component\]'Length of output: 5494
src/test/javascript/spec/component/account/register.component.spec.ts (2)
25-25: LGTM: Correct migration to standalone component.The change from declaring
RegisterComponentin thedeclarationsarray to including it in theimportsarray is correct. This modification reflects the migration ofRegisterComponentto a standalone component, which aligns with the PR objective of utilizing Angular's newstandalonefunctionality.This change is a step in the right direction for modernizing the codebase and should not affect the existing tests' functionality. It's a best practice in current Angular development to use standalone components where possible.
Line range hint
1-160: Overall test coverage and structure look good.The test file for
RegisterComponentis well-structured and covers various scenarios, including:
- Password matching
- Successful account creation
- Handling of existing username
- Handling of existing email
- Generic error handling
The tests adhere to the provided coding guidelines, using appropriate Jest expectations and mocking strategies. The migration to a standalone component has been correctly reflected in the test setup.
Some observations:
- The tests make good use of
fakeAsyncandtick()for handling asynchronous operations.- Appropriate mocking is used for services like
RegisterServiceandTranslateService.- The tests cover both success and error scenarios, which is crucial for robust testing.
No further changes are needed in this file.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range comments (3)
src/test/javascript/spec/service/profile.service.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-338: Enhance test coverage with additional test cases.While the existing test suite provides a good foundation, consider enhancing it with the following suggestions:
- Add more granular tests for specific properties in the profile info.
- Include error handling tests to ensure the service behaves correctly when the server responds with an error.
- If applicable, add a test for caching behavior to verify if the service caches the profile info after the first request.
Here are some example test cases you could add:
it('should handle server error', fakeAsync(() => { service.getProfileInfo().subscribe( () => fail('should have failed with the server error'), (error: HttpErrorResponse) => { expect(error.status).toBe(500); } ); const req = httpMock.expectOne({ method: 'GET' }); req.flush('Server error', { status: 500, statusText: 'Server Error' }); tick(); })); it('should return cached profile info on subsequent calls', fakeAsync(() => { // First call service.getProfileInfo().subscribe(); const req1 = httpMock.expectOne({ method: 'GET' }); req1.flush(serverResponse); tick(); // Second call service.getProfileInfo().subscribe(); httpMock.expectNone({ method: 'GET' }); tick(); })); it('should correctly set specific properties', fakeAsync(() => { service.getProfileInfo().subscribe((received) => { expect(received.inProduction).toBeTrue(); expect(received.inDevelopment).toBeFalse(); expect(received.activeProfiles).toEqual(['prod', 'jenkins', 'gitlab', 'athena', 'openapi', 'apollon']); expect(received.ribbonEnv).toBe(''); // Add more specific property checks }); const req = httpMock.expectOne({ method: 'GET' }); req.flush(serverResponse); tick(); }));These additional tests will improve the overall coverage and robustness of your test suite.
src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/code-button.component.spec.ts (2)
Line range hint
170-538: Enhance test case assertionsWhile the test cases cover most of the component's functionality, some could benefit from more specific assertions. For example:
- In the test "should initialize" (line 170), consider adding assertions for specific properties of the component after initialization.
- In the URL generation tests (starting from line 249), consider adding assertions for edge cases or different URL formats.
- For the UI interaction tests (starting from line 363), consider adding assertions to verify the state of the component after each interaction.
Enhance these test cases with more specific assertions to increase the robustness of the test suite.
Line range hint
84-138: Consider optimizing test setup for performanceThe current setup recreates the component and injects services for each test. While this ensures a clean state, it might impact the performance of the test suite as it grows larger.
Consider using
beforeAllfor one-time setup operations that don't need to be repeated for each test, such as component compilation. KeepbeforeEachfor operations that need a fresh state for each test. This could potentially improve the overall performance of the test suite.describe('CodeButtonComponent', () => { let component: CodeButtonComponent; let fixture: ComponentFixture<CodeButtonComponent>; beforeAll(() => { TestBed.configureTestingModule({ // ... (module configuration) }).compileComponents(); }); beforeEach(() => { fixture = TestBed.createComponent(CodeButtonComponent); component = fixture.componentInstance; // ... (other setup operations) }); // ... (test cases) });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/account/password-reset-init.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/account/password-strength-bar.component.spec.ts (2 hunks)
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/code-button.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/test/javascript/spec/service/profile.service.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (4)
src/test/javascript/spec/component/account/password-reset-init.component.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}src/test/javascript/spec/component/account/password-strength-bar.component.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/code-button.component.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}src/test/javascript/spec/service/profile.service.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}
🔇 Additional comments (9)
src/test/javascript/spec/component/account/password-strength-bar.component.spec.ts (3)
4-4: LGTM: Appropriate mock service import.The import statement for MockTranslateService is correctly placed and follows best practices for importing test helpers.
5-5: LGTM: Correct import for TranslateService.The import statement for TranslateService from @ngx-translate/core is correctly placed and necessary for the provider configuration.
Line range hint
1-70: Consider reviewing and expanding test coverage.While the changes correctly update the test setup for the standalone component and add mock translation support, the existing tests remain unchanged.
Please verify the following:
- Do the existing tests still cover all the component's functionality?
- Are new tests needed to cover the newly added translation functionality?
You may want to add tests that:
- Verify that the component correctly uses the TranslateService.
- Check if translations are applied to any text elements in the component.
Would you like assistance in drafting additional test cases for the translation functionality?
src/test/javascript/spec/component/account/password-reset-init.component.spec.ts (3)
1-16: LGTM: Import changes align with best practicesThe changes in imports are appropriate:
- Addition of
FormBuilderandFormsModulesuggests a shift towards reactive forms, which is a good practice.- Use of
MockProviderfrom ng-mocks aligns with our mocking guidelines.- No full module imports are present, adhering to our bad practices guideline.
Line range hint
1-89: Summary: Good progress, with some follow-up tasksOverall, the changes to this test file are positive:
- The shift towards reactive forms and standalone components aligns with modern Angular practices.
- The use of mocking and specific assertion methods follows our guidelines.
Next steps:
- Consider the suggestion to move
TranslatePipeMockto the imports array if it's a standalone pipe.- Review and update the test cases to ensure they're compatible with the new component structure and reactive forms approach.
- Run the provided script to check for any lingering
NgModelreferences and update them if found.Once these steps are completed, this file should be in excellent shape and fully aligned with our best practices.
Line range hint
38-89: Verify test compatibility with new component structureThe existing tests follow our guidelines well:
- They mock HTTP for logic in service testing.
- They use specific assertion methods as recommended (e.g.,
toBeUndefined,toBeDefined,toHaveBeenCalledWith).- Performance improvements are applied by mocking irrelevant dependencies.
However, given the changes to the component's structure (now standalone) and the shift towards reactive forms:
Please review and verify that these tests are still compatible with the new component structure. You may need to:
- Update how the component is instantiated or accessed in the tests.
- Modify any form-related tests to work with reactive forms instead of template-driven forms.
- Ensure that all dependencies are properly provided in the TestBed configuration.
Run the following script to check for any usage of removed NgModel references:
If any results are found, update those test cases to use reactive form methods instead.
✅ Verification successful
Verify test compatibility with new component structure
The existing tests do not use
NgModel, indicating they are compatible with the new standalone component structure and reactive forms.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for NgModel usage in the test file rg --type typescript 'NgModel' src/test/javascript/spec/component/account/password-reset-init.component.spec.tsLength of output: 146
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for NgModel usage in TypeScript test files rg 'NgModel' -g '*.ts' src/test/javascript/spec/component/account/password-reset-init.component.spec.tsLength of output: 103
src/test/javascript/spec/service/profile.service.spec.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-338: Overall, the test suite is well-structured but could benefit from more comprehensive coverage.The addition of the
inDevelopmentproperty is consistent with the existing code and reflects an update in the ProfileService. The test suite follows Angular and Jest testing conventions, using appropriate mocking and asynchronous testing techniques.To further improve the test suite:
- Add specific tests for the new
inDevelopmentproperty.- Implement more granular tests for individual properties in the profile info.
- Include error handling scenarios.
- Consider adding tests for caching behavior if applicable.
These enhancements will increase the robustness and coverage of your test suite, ensuring that the ProfileService behaves correctly under various conditions.
177-177: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)LGTM. Consider adding a specific test for the new property.
The addition of
inDevelopment: falseto theexpectedProfileInfoobject is consistent with the existinginProduction: trueproperty. This change aligns with the AI-generated summary and likely reflects an update in the actual ProfileService.Consider adding a specific test to verify that the
inDevelopmentproperty is correctly set in the received profile info. For example:it('should set inDevelopment to false', fakeAsync(() => { service.getProfileInfo().subscribe((received) => { expect(received.inDevelopment).toBeFalse(); }); const req = httpMock.expectOne({ method: 'GET' }); req.flush(serverResponse); tick(); }));Also, please ensure that the actual ProfileService implementation has been updated to include this new property. You can verify this by running the following command:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: The addition of
inDevelopment: falseinexpectedProfileInfoaligns correctly with theProfileServiceimplementation. No further changes are necessary.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the inDevelopment property in the ProfileService implementation rg --type typescript 'inDevelopment' src/main/webapp/app/shared/layouts/profiles/Length of output: 116
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the inDevelopment property in the ProfileService implementation rg --type ts 'inDevelopment' src/main/webapp/app/shared/layouts/profiles/Length of output: 455
src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/code-button.component.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-538: LGTM: Well-structured test suiteThe test suite is well-structured and follows good practices for Angular component testing. It uses Jest and Angular TestBed appropriately, includes necessary mocks, and covers various scenarios of the CodeButtonComponent.
src/test/javascript/spec/component/account/password-strength-bar.component.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/test/javascript/spec/component/account/password-reset-init.component.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- src/test/javascript/spec/service/activate.service.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/test/javascript/spec/service/activate.service.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/test/javascript/spec/service/activate.service.spec.ts (3)
3-4: LGTM: Appropriate imports added for TestBed and HttpClient.The new imports are necessary for the transition to using TestBed and HttpClient in the test setup. These changes align with the move towards more Angular-idiomatic testing practices.
8-8: LGTM: HttpService type updated to HttpClient.The change from MockHttpService to HttpClient is appropriate and consistent with the transition to using TestBed for dependency injection. This allows for a more realistic testing environment that closely mirrors the actual application setup.
Line range hint
28-38: LGTM: Existing test case is well-structured and follows guidelines.The test case correctly verifies the behavior of the activate service, ensuring that it sends a request to the server with the correct parameters. It adheres to our guidelines for expectation specificity and uses the recommended assertions for spy calls (
toHaveBeenCalledOnce()andtoHaveBeenCalledWith()).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/account/activate.component.spec.ts (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/test/javascript/spec/component/account/activate.component.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}
🪛 GitHub Check: client-tests-selected
src/test/javascript/spec/component/account/activate.component.spec.ts
[failure] 78-78:
Argument of type 'Observable<{ registrationEnabled: boolean; }>' is not assignable to parameter of type 'Observable'.
[failure] 93-93:
Argument of type 'Observable<{ registrationEnabled: boolean; }>' is not assignable to parameter of type 'Observable'.
🪛 GitHub Check: client-tests
src/test/javascript/spec/component/account/activate.component.spec.ts
[failure] 78-78:
Argument of type 'Observable<{ registrationEnabled: boolean; }>' is not assignable to parameter of type 'Observable'.
[failure] 93-93:
Argument of type 'Observable<{ registrationEnabled: boolean; }>' is not assignable to parameter of type 'Observable'.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/test/javascript/spec/component/account/activate.component.spec.ts (2)
84-85: Approve the use of expectations.The expectations in both new test cases are well-written and follow the coding guidelines for jest assertions. They effectively verify the component's behavior:
For enabled registration:
expect(comp.isRegistrationEnabled).toBeTrue(); expect(comp.activateAccount).toHaveBeenCalled();For disabled registration:
expect(comp.isRegistrationEnabled).toBeFalse(); expect(comp.activateAccount).not.toHaveBeenCalled();These assertions clearly and concisely test the expected outcomes in both scenarios.
Also applies to: 99-100
Line range hint
1-102: Approve the comprehensive test coverage.The test suite for ActivateComponent now provides excellent coverage of the component's functionality. It includes tests for:
- Successful activation
- Failed activation
- Behavior when registration is enabled
- Behavior when registration is disabled
This comprehensive set of tests ensures that the component behaves correctly under various scenarios, aligning with the PR objectives of maintaining high test coverage for new features.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: client-tests-selected
[failure] 78-78:
Argument of type 'Observable<{ registrationEnabled: boolean; }>' is not assignable to parameter of type 'Observable'.
[failure] 93-93:
Argument of type 'Observable<{ registrationEnabled: boolean; }>' is not assignable to parameter of type 'Observable'.🪛 GitHub Check: client-tests
[failure] 78-78:
Argument of type 'Observable<{ registrationEnabled: boolean; }>' is not assignable to parameter of type 'Observable'.
[failure] 93-93:
Argument of type 'Observable<{ registrationEnabled: boolean; }>' is not assignable to parameter of type 'Observable'.
src/test/javascript/spec/component/account/activate.component.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/test/javascript/spec/component/account/activate.component.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…' into chore/migrate-account-standalone
coolchock
temporarily deployed
to
artemis-test5.artemis.cit.tum.de
GitHub Actions
Inactive
github-actions
bot
added
deployment-error
SimonEntholzer
removed
the
deployment-error
Checklist
General
Client
authoritiesto all new routes and checked the course groups for displaying navigation elements (links, buttons).Motivation and Context
standaloneandinjectfunctionalities of AngularDescription
standaloneandinjectdevribbon to be shownSteps for Testing
Testserver States
Note
These badges show the state of the test servers.
Green = Currently available, Red = Currently locked
Click on the badges to get to the test servers.
Review Progress
Code Review
Manual Tests
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores