Hotfix rephrasing Pipeline

[cremertim]

#196 introduced a new necessary argument for the request_handler.chat method, which is not accordingly updated in the Rewrite pipeline (#191).

We did not spot this during merging, so this PR introduces sets this required variable to 0 so it does not crash any longer

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Improvements
  • Updated method signature in the RewritingPipeline to support an optional tools parameter.
  • Enhanced chat functionality with an additional tools argument (set to None).

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the RewritingPipeline class in the rewriting_pipeline.py file by updating the method signature of the __call__ method to include a new optional tools parameter. The invocation of the chat method within the request handler has been adjusted to accept this new parameter, which is explicitly set to None. This change does not alter the existing logic, error handling, or control flow.

Changes

File	Change Summary
app/pipeline/rewriting_pipeline.py	Updated __call__ method signature to include tools=None parameter and modified the call to self.request_handler.chat to include the tools argument.

Possibly related PRs

• Bugfix/index and parenthesis bug fixes #138: The changes in the __call__ method of the RewritingPipeline class in the main PR involve modifying method parameters, which is a similar type of change to the method signature updates seen in the retrieved PR, although they are in different classes.

Suggested reviewers

• Hialus

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b754c2e and 96c2b31.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• app/pipeline/rewriting_pipeline.py (1 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• app/pipeline/rewriting_pipeline.py

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)

• GitHub Check: Build and Push Docker Image

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

app/pipeline/rewriting_pipeline.py (1)

56-56: LGTM! The hotfix addresses the missing argument.

The addition of tools=None parameter to the chat method call aligns with the PR objectives and should prevent the application from crashing.

However, there's a minor formatting issue that needs to be fixed:

-            [prompt], CompletionArguments(temperature=0.4), tools = None
+            [prompt], CompletionArguments(temperature=0.4), tools=None

🧰 Tools

🪛 GitHub Actions: Run linters

[warning] File needs to be reformatted using Black code formatter

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d37f5c4 and b754c2e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• app/pipeline/rewriting_pipeline.py (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 GitHub Actions: Run linters

app/pipeline/rewriting_pipeline.py

[warning] File needs to be reformatted using Black code formatter

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)

• GitHub Check: Build and Push Docker Image

[FelixTJDietrich]

Also contained in #192

[bassner]

Seems to be an empty PR now. :)