Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Declarative schema: Omitting indexType throws exception #21322

Closed
k4emic opened this issue Feb 19, 2019 · 7 comments
Closed

Declarative schema: Omitting indexType throws exception #21322

k4emic opened this issue Feb 19, 2019 · 7 comments
Labels
Component: Framework/Setup USE ONLY for FRAMEWORK RELATED BUG! E.g If bug occurs during Catalog Setup use just Catalog Fixed in 2.3.x The issue has been fixed in 2.3 release line Issue: Clear Description Gate 2 Passed. Manual verification of the issue description passed Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed Issue: Format is valid Gate 1 Passed. Automatic verification of issue format passed Issue: Ready for Work Gate 4. Acknowledged. Issue is added to backlog and ready for development Reproduced on 2.3.x The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.3 release

Comments

@k4emic
Copy link

k4emic commented Feb 19, 2019

Preconditions (*)

  1. Magento 2.3

Steps to reproduce (*)

  1. Add any module with the below db_schema.xml contents
  2. Run php bin/magento setup:upgrade multiple times
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<schema xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
        xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="urn:magento:framework:Setup/Declaration/Schema/etc/schema.xsd">
    <table name="inventory_source_item">
        <column xsi:type="timestamp" name="updated_at" on_update="true" nullable="false" default="CURRENT_TIMESTAMP"
                comment="Update Time"/>
        <index referenceId="INVENTORY_SOURCE_ITEM_UPDATED_AT">
            <column name="updated_at"/>
        </index>
    </table>
</schema>

Expected result (*)

  1. Index is created on first run
  2. Subsequent runs results in no modifications

Actual result (*)

  1. Index is created on first run
  2. Subsequent runs will throw an exception: PDOException: SQLSTATE[42000]: Syntax error or access violation: 1061 Duplicate key name 'INVENTORY_SOURCE_ITEM_UPDATED_AT'
@magento-engcom-team magento-engcom-team added the Issue: Format is valid Gate 1 Passed. Automatic verification of issue format passed label Feb 19, 2019
@magento-engcom-team
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @k4emic. Thank you for your report.
To help us process this issue please make sure that you provided the following information:

  • Summary of the issue
  • Information on your environment
  • Steps to reproduce
  • Expected and actual results

Please make sure that the issue is reproducible on the vanilla Magento instance following Steps to reproduce. To deploy vanilla Magento instance on our environment, please, add a comment to the issue:

@magento-engcom-team give me 2.3-develop instance - upcoming 2.3.x release

For more details, please, review the Magento Contributor Assistant documentation.

@k4emic do you confirm that you was able to reproduce the issue on vanilla Magento instance following steps to reproduce?

  • yes
  • no

@ghost ghost self-assigned this Feb 19, 2019
@magento-engcom-team
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @engcom-backlog-nazar. Thank you for working on this issue.
In order to make sure that issue has enough information and ready for development, please read and check the following instruction: 👇

  • 1. Verify that issue has all the required information. (Preconditions, Steps to reproduce, Expected result, Actual result).

    DetailsIf the issue has a valid description, the label Issue: Format is valid will be added to the issue automatically. Please, edit issue description if needed, until label Issue: Format is valid appears.

  • 2. Verify that issue has a meaningful description and provides enough information to reproduce the issue. If the report is valid, add Issue: Clear Description label to the issue by yourself.

  • 3. Add Component: XXXXX label(s) to the ticket, indicating the components it may be related to.

  • 4. Verify that the issue is reproducible on 2.3-develop branch

    Details- Add the comment @magento-engcom-team give me 2.3-develop instance to deploy test instance on Magento infrastructure.
    - If the issue is reproducible on 2.3-develop branch, please, add the label Reproduced on 2.3.x.
    - If the issue is not reproducible, add your comment that issue is not reproducible and close the issue and stop verification process here!

  • 5. Verify that the issue is reproducible on 2.2-develop branch.

    Details- Add the comment @magento-engcom-team give me 2.2-develop instance to deploy test instance on Magento infrastructure.
    - If the issue is reproducible on 2.2-develop branch, please add the label Reproduced on 2.2.x

  • Next steps are available in case you are a member of Community Maintainers.

  • 6. Add label Issue: Confirmed once verification is complete.

  • 7. Make sure that automatic system confirms that report has been added to the backlog.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 19, 2019

Hi @k4emic hi thank you for you report, please open issue here ->https://github.com/magento-engcom/msi

@ghost ghost closed this as completed Feb 19, 2019
@k4emic
Copy link
Author

k4emic commented Feb 19, 2019

Hi @engcom-backlog-nazar
The MSI component is simply used as an example here, adding an index to any table/column will result in this bug.

@k4emic k4emic reopened this Feb 19, 2019
@k4emic
Copy link
Author

k4emic commented Feb 19, 2019

Digging a bit into the code, this happens because the two compared elements (generated index and existing index) uses two different casings for "btree" in their dataset: https://cl.ly/f1b0ca1d4e8f/Image%202019-02-19%20at%208.50.19%20AM.png

\Magento\Framework\Setup\Declaration\Schema\Dto\Factories\Index::DEFAULT_INDEX_TYPE is set to "BTREE". Changing it to lowercase resolves the problem.

@ghost ghost added Issue: Clear Description Gate 2 Passed. Manual verification of the issue description passed Component: Framework/Setup USE ONLY for FRAMEWORK RELATED BUG! E.g If bug occurs during Catalog Setup use just Catalog Reproduced on 2.3.x The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.3 release Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed labels Feb 19, 2019
@magento-engcom-team magento-engcom-team added the Issue: Ready for Work Gate 4. Acknowledged. Issue is added to backlog and ready for development label Feb 19, 2019
@magento-engcom-team
Copy link
Contributor

✅ Confirmed by @engcom-backlog-nazar
Thank you for verifying the issue. Based on the provided information internal tickets MAGETWO-98315 were created

Issue Available: @engcom-backlog-nazar, You will be automatically unassigned. Contributors/Maintainers can claim this issue to continue. To reclaim and continue work, reassign the ticket to yourself.

@magento-engcom-team
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @k4emic. Thank you for your report.
The issue has been fixed in #21328 by @milindsingh in 2.3-develop branch
Related commit(s):

The fix will be available with the upcoming 2.3.2 release.

@magento-engcom-team magento-engcom-team added the Fixed in 2.3.x The issue has been fixed in 2.3 release line label Feb 25, 2019
magento-engcom-team added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 25, 2019
…ype throws exception #21328

 - Merge Pull Request #21328 from cedcommerce/magento2:issue-fix-21322-2.3-develop
 - Merged commits:
   1. b179e54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Component: Framework/Setup USE ONLY for FRAMEWORK RELATED BUG! E.g If bug occurs during Catalog Setup use just Catalog Fixed in 2.3.x The issue has been fixed in 2.3 release line Issue: Clear Description Gate 2 Passed. Manual verification of the issue description passed Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed Issue: Format is valid Gate 1 Passed. Automatic verification of issue format passed Issue: Ready for Work Gate 4. Acknowledged. Issue is added to backlog and ready for development Reproduced on 2.3.x The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.3 release
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants