Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expand discussion on nesting tasks and limitations #77

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Nov 17, 2023
Merged

Conversation

maltezfaria
Copy link
Owner

Still WIP, but the idea is to explain a bit better the current limitations. In particular, why nesting is somewhat tricky, and what are the current workarounds. Maybe this will also help us decide on a proper way forward, such as the nesting of TaskGraphs and merging of LogInfo objects.

start discussion on nesting of tasks
- when set to false, does not execute code
- useful updating mostly the text of the docs
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 8, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (c9eec85) 86.00% compared to head (bd6ef27) 80.86%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #77      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   86.00%   80.86%   -5.14%     
==========================================
  Files           9        9              
  Lines         686      690       +4     
==========================================
- Hits          590      558      -32     
- Misses         96      132      +36     

see 7 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@maltezfaria
Copy link
Owner Author

@ffevotte I think this is ready for a first review. I found it quite tricky to explain the problem with nested tasks, but I tried 😅

https://maltezfaria.github.io/DataFlowTasks.jl/previews/PR77/troubleshooting/#nested-tasks

@maltezfaria maltezfaria marked this pull request as ready for review November 9, 2023 17:50
@maltezfaria
Copy link
Owner Author

While I was at it, I also added a small suggested workflow section with the experience described in #40

@maltezfaria maltezfaria merged commit 193ad7b into main Nov 17, 2023
6 of 7 checks passed
@maltezfaria maltezfaria deleted the nested-dag branch November 17, 2023 12:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Document troubleshooting and debugging strategies
1 participant