Revert 98ac7a4 and a477d1d

[KostyaTretyak]

See #1006

[joshbruce]

@Feder1co5oave: Real quick, this looks good to me, but I would like a second pair of eyes - just to be able to add it to the release we are trying to do today.

Thank you @KostyaTretyak!

[Feder1co5oave]

NO WAIT

[Feder1co5oave]

Looks like this won't solve #1006. Check out my last comments.

[KostyaTretyak]

Now marked works this way:

`
def ?`

Output:

<p>`</p>
<p>def ?`</p>

With this pull request marked output:

<p><code>def ?</code></p>

[KostyaTretyak]

However, when we return everything as it was before 98ac7a4, then this rule will not be works.

A link reference definition cannot interrupt a paragraph.

[joshbruce]

Three questions mainly for @KostyaTretyak, @Feder1co5oave, @UziTech:

1. Do we merge this before doing the release of 0.3.12?
2. Should we push the release off a day or two to figure this out?
3. Should we go ahead and make the release to close-out the XSS upgradeability then deal with issues as they come?

[Feder1co5oave]

I believe it's better if we just revert this one (#974), push out important security issues and in the meanwhile work on these, as you suggest @joshbruce.

@KostyaTretyak I admit I'm crossing my eyes over regexes and markdown examples, can you point out in the review what complies to the spec and what doesn't?

Thanks to both of you

[joshbruce]

@Feder1co5oave: I believe that's the best as well. Having said that, still not entirely comfortable doing the revert myself using git revert if this one doesn't do that. Help a brother out?

[Feder1co5oave]

You only need to merge this pr

[joshbruce]

@Feder1co5oave: Thanks, brother. Just really wanted to make sure I was looking at the right thing and understanding the conversation that was happening. :)

[joshbruce]

Text-based communication because the lowest bandwidth communication and all that. ;)