Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clean up tests #3713

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 26, 2024
Merged

Clean up tests #3713

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 26, 2024

Conversation

janosh
Copy link
Member

@janosh janosh commented Mar 26, 2024

e.g. remove unnecessary for loops when using pytest.approx()

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Enhanced variable naming for better clarity in code and tests.
    • Improved efficiency in matrix manipulation for chemical analysis tools.
    • Streamlined test cases for readability and consistency.
  • Tests
    • Updated and refactored multiple test cases for clarity and reliability across various modules.

e.g. remove unnecessary for loops when using pytest.approx()
@janosh janosh added tests Issues with or changes to the pymatgen test suite linting Linting and quality assurance housekeeping Moving around or cleaning up old code/files labels Mar 26, 2024
@janosh janosh requested review from shyuep and mkhorton as code owners March 26, 2024 11:22
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 26, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates focus on enhancing code readability and efficiency in a scientific computing library. Changes include variable renaming for clarity, matrix manipulation optimization, and test case refinement for improved precision. These updates aim to boost maintainability and performance, making the codebase more developer-friendly.

Changes

Files Change Summary
pymatgen/io/lmto.py Renamed variables for clarity in loops within from_str method.
pymatgen/io/nwchem.py Optimized hessian and projected_hessian matrix handling.
tests/analysis/.../test_elastic.py, tests/analysis/test_graphs.py, tests/analysis/test_local_env.py, tests/core/test_interface.py, tests/core/test_lattice.py, tests/core/test_surface.py, tests/core/test_trajectory.py Renamed loop variables to idx, updated variable names and assertions for clarity.
tests/core/test_units.py, tests/electronic_structure/test_boltztrap.py, tests/ext/test_matproj.py, tests/io/lobster/test_inputs.py, tests/io/vasp/test_outputs.py, tests/symmetry/test_analyzer.py, tests/transformations/test_standard_transformations.py Enhanced test clarity with variable renaming, direct assertions, and refactored loops.

"In the realm of code where logic threads weave,
🐇 A rabbit hopped, with changes up its sleeve.
Variables renamed, for clarity's embrace,
And loops refined, in the digital space.
With every hop, efficiency achieved,
In a codebase garden, freshly conceived."
🌟🌱

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 1

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 77429a6 and 1e79a06.
Files selected for processing (16)
  • pymatgen/io/lmto.py (3 hunks)
  • pymatgen/io/nwchem.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/analysis/elasticity/test_elastic.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/analysis/test_graphs.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/analysis/test_local_env.py (2 hunks)
  • tests/core/test_interface.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/core/test_lattice.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/core/test_surface.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/core/test_trajectory.py (3 hunks)
  • tests/core/test_units.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/electronic_structure/test_boltztrap.py (4 hunks)
  • tests/ext/test_matproj.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/io/lobster/test_inputs.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/io/vasp/test_outputs.py (4 hunks)
  • tests/symmetry/test_analyzer.py (2 hunks)
  • tests/transformations/test_standard_transformations.py (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
  • tests/analysis/test_graphs.py
  • tests/core/test_interface.py
  • tests/core/test_surface.py
  • tests/ext/test_matproj.py
Additional comments: 33
tests/core/test_units.py (1)
  • 96-126: The renaming of functions from f, g, h, i, and j to func1, func2, func3, func4, and func5 respectively, improves readability and clarity. This change aligns well with the PR's objective of enhancing code maintainability and clarity. Good job on making these names more descriptive.
tests/electronic_structure/test_boltztrap.py (8)
  • 93-100: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [96-112]

Replacing loops with direct assertions and adjusting tolerance values in the test cases enhances the clarity and efficiency of the tests. This approach makes the tests more straightforward and easier to understand, which is beneficial for maintainability. Good job on these improvements.

  • 119-122: Direct assertions in test cases, as seen here, contribute to making the tests more concise and readable. This change aligns with the PR's goal of cleaning up and optimizing the codebase.
  • 126-131: The use of direct assertions and the adjustment of tolerance values in these test cases are excellent examples of the PR's objectives to enhance test clarity and efficiency. These changes make the tests more straightforward and maintainable.
  • 135-140: Replacing loops with direct assertions in the test cases, as done here, improves the readability and efficiency of the tests. This aligns with the PR's goal of optimizing the codebase for better maintainability and clarity.
  • 108-147: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [144-160]

The modifications to use direct assertions and adjust tolerance values in the test cases are in line with the PR's objectives. These changes contribute to making the tests more concise and easier to understand, which is beneficial for future maintenance.

  • 168-168: Using direct assertions in test cases, as demonstrated here, aligns with the PR's goal of enhancing test clarity and efficiency. This approach makes the tests more straightforward and maintainable.
  • 172-176: The changes to replace loops with direct assertions and adjust tolerance values in these test cases are excellent examples of the PR's objectives to clean up and optimize the codebase. These modifications enhance the readability and efficiency of the tests.
  • 188-189: Using direct assertions in test cases, as seen here, contributes to making the tests more concise and readable. This change aligns with the PR's goal of cleaning up and optimizing the codebase.
pymatgen/io/lmto.py (1)
  • 184-196: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [187-217]

Renaming variables for clarity and adjusting variable names in the from_str method of the LMTOCtrl class enhances code readability and maintainability. These changes align with the PR's objective of improving the clarity and efficiency of the codebase. Good job on making these names more descriptive and the logic more understandable.

tests/core/test_trajectory.py (3)
  • 74-75: The change from i to idx in the loop variable name enhances clarity and consistency with the rest of the codebase.
  • 90-90: The change from i to idx in the loop variable name enhances clarity and consistency with the rest of the codebase.
  • 424-428: The change from i to idx in the loop variable name enhances clarity and consistency with the rest of the codebase.
tests/analysis/elasticity/test_elastic.py (1)
  • 414-415: The change from i to idx in the loop variable name enhances clarity and consistency with the rest of the codebase.
tests/transformations/test_standard_transformations.py (1)
  • 128-128: The change from using random to np.random.randint for generating random integers is a positive one, as it enhances the reliability and consistency of random number generation. This is particularly important in a testing context where reproducibility of results can be crucial.
tests/core/test_lattice.py (1)
  • 438-439: The changes to use np.random.randint and np.random.rand for generating lengths and lattice improve readability and efficiency. However, consider adding a comment explaining the choice of random values and ensuring that the randomness does not compromise the test's reliability.
tests/symmetry/test_analyzer.py (2)
  • 362-367: Renaming sa to spg_analyzer in the test_tricky_structure function improves readability and clarity by using a more descriptive variable name. This change aligns well with the PR's objective of enhancing code clarity.
  • 376-381: The use of different indices in the list comprehensions for sites1 and sites2 in the test_are_symmetrically_equivalent function is a logical approach to testing symmetry between different sets of sites. This change contributes to the PR's goal of refining tests for better clarity and efficiency.
pymatgen/io/nwchem.py (2)
  • 923-926: The logic for ensuring the symmetry of the hessian matrix by filling in the upper triangular part based on the lower triangular part is correct. However, consider adding a comment explaining this operation for future maintainability. Additionally, for very large matrices, this nested loop approach might impact performance. It could be beneficial to review if there are more efficient numpy operations that can achieve the same result.
  • 928-931: Identical considerations as for the hessian matrix apply here for ensuring the symmetry of the projected_hessian matrix. Adding a comment for clarity and reviewing potential performance implications for large matrices would be beneficial.
tests/analysis/test_local_env.py (2)
  • 537-548: The changes in the TestMotifIdentification class, specifically the use of idx instead of i in loops and the updated assertion messages, improve readability and maintainability. These modifications align well with the PR's objectives of enhancing clarity and efficiency.
  • 1009-1009: The assignment of specific parameters to op_params for indices 1, 2, and 33 is clear and aligns with the PR's goal of optimizing logic. However, the syntax error in the previous comment needs to be addressed for this to work correctly.
tests/io/vasp/test_outputs.py (2)
  • 240-247: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1983-1985]

LGTM!

  • 1996-2010: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1987-2007]

LGTM!

tests/io/lobster/test_inputs.py (9)
  • 268-274: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]

Please ensure that all test classes and methods have appropriate docstrings that describe their purpose, inputs, and expected outcomes. This will improve code maintainability and readability.

  • 268-274: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]

Consider adding more edge case tests for TestLobsterin to cover scenarios where input files might be malformed or missing expected data. This will help ensure robust error handling and validation in the Lobsterin class.

  • 268-274: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]

In TestBandoverlaps, consider testing the behavior when the band overlap file is incomplete or contains unexpected values. Adding such tests can help identify and handle potential parsing errors more gracefully.

  • 268-274: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]

For TestGrosspop, adding tests that verify the handling of negative or zero population values could enhance the test coverage, ensuring that the gross population parsing logic is robust against various input scenarios.

  • 268-274: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]

In TestSitePotentials, it would be beneficial to include tests that check the behavior when site potential data is missing for some sites in the structure. This can help ensure that the code gracefully handles incomplete data.

  • 268-274: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]

For TestMadelungEnergies, consider adding tests that simulate scenarios with extremely high or low Madelung energies, to ensure that the parsing and handling logic can cope with a wide range of energy values.

  • 268-274: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]

In TestLobsterMatrices, adding tests for scenarios where matrix files are corrupted or have unexpected formats would improve the robustness of the LobsterMatrices class by ensuring it can handle error conditions effectively.

  • 268-274: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]

For TestWavefunction, consider implementing tests that verify the behavior when wavefunction files are incomplete or contain non-numeric values. This will help ensure that the wavefunction parsing logic is resilient to various file contents.

  • 268-274: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]

In TestUtils, adding tests for utility functions with edge case inputs (e.g., empty lists, null values) could enhance the test coverage and ensure that these functions behave as expected under all conditions.

Comment on lines 1006 to 1009
op_params = [None] * range(len(op_types))
op_params[1] = {"TA": 1, "IGW_TA": 1.0 / 0.0667}
op_params[2] = {"TA": 45.0 / 180, "IGW_TA": 1.0 / 0.0667}
op_params[33] = {
"TA": 0.6081734479693927,
"IGW_TA": 18.33,
"fac_AA": 1.5,
"exp_cos_AA": 2,
}
op_params[33] = {"TA": 0.6081734479693927, "IGW_TA": 18.33, "fac_AA": 1.5, "exp_cos_AA": 2}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The initialization of op_params using a list comprehension is a significant improvement in terms of readability and efficiency. However, there's a minor issue with the syntax used for defining the size of op_params. The correct way to initialize a list of a specific size with None values in Python is [None] * len(op_types), not [None] * range(len(op_types)).

- op_params = [None] * range(len(op_types))
+ op_params = [None] * len(op_types)

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
op_params = [None] * range(len(op_types))
op_params[1] = {"TA": 1, "IGW_TA": 1.0 / 0.0667}
op_params[2] = {"TA": 45.0 / 180, "IGW_TA": 1.0 / 0.0667}
op_params[33] = {
"TA": 0.6081734479693927,
"IGW_TA": 18.33,
"fac_AA": 1.5,
"exp_cos_AA": 2,
}
op_params[33] = {"TA": 0.6081734479693927, "IGW_TA": 18.33, "fac_AA": 1.5, "exp_cos_AA": 2}
op_params = [None] * len(op_types)
op_params[1] = {"TA": 1, "IGW_TA": 1.0 / 0.0667}
op_params[2] = {"TA": 45.0 / 180, "IGW_TA": 1.0 / 0.0667}
op_params[33] = {"TA": 0.6081734479693927, "IGW_TA": 18.33, "fac_AA": 1.5, "exp_cos_AA": 2}

@janosh janosh enabled auto-merge (squash) March 26, 2024 11:36
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1e79a06 and b994f49.
Files selected for processing (5)
  • tests/analysis/ferroelectricity/test_polarization.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/analysis/test_local_env.py (2 hunks)
  • tests/electronic_structure/test_plotter.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/io/abinit/test_inputs.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/io/test_pwscf.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • tests/analysis/test_local_env.py
Additional comments: 5
tests/io/abinit/test_inputs.py (1)
  • 223-229: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [20-20]

Renaming the loop variable from i to idx improves readability and does not introduce any issues.

tests/io/test_pwscf.py (2)
  • 367-367: Renaming pwin to pw_in improves readability by making the variable name more descriptive.
  • 370-370: Renaming pwout to pw_out enhances clarity and consistency in the code.
tests/analysis/ferroelectricity/test_polarization.py (1)
  • 20-20: Modifying the range in the list comprehension for generating folder names appears to correctly adjust the folder naming logic. Ensure this change aligns with the intended folder structure and naming convention.
tests/electronic_structure/test_plotter.py (1)
  • 232-243: The refactoring of loop variables from i, j, k, m to ii, jj, kk, ll improves readability by avoiding single-letter variable names that are often used as indices in mathematical contexts. This change aligns with best practices for clarity and maintainability. However, there's an opportunity to further enhance the code by explaining the purpose of these loops and the logic behind the random number generation for a and b. Adding a brief comment could help future maintainers understand the intent behind this code segment more quickly.

Consider adding a comment above the loop to explain its purpose and the logic behind the random number assignments to a and b. This will improve code readability and maintainability.

@janosh janosh merged commit 9a9a53f into master Mar 26, 2024
22 checks passed
@janosh janosh deleted the test-qa branch March 26, 2024 11:48
@janosh janosh mentioned this pull request Mar 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
housekeeping Moving around or cleaning up old code/files linting Linting and quality assurance tests Issues with or changes to the pymatgen test suite
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant