Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ability to blacklist users from contacting you. (SPEC-123) #435

Closed
matrixbot opened this issue Mar 8, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

Ability to blacklist users from contacting you. (SPEC-123) #435

matrixbot opened this issue Mar 8, 2015 · 4 comments
Labels
feature Suggestion for a significant extension which needs considerable consideration p2

Comments

@matrixbot
Copy link
Member

We currently have no way of asking you server to blacklist groups of users from ever trying to contact you. This is a pretty important abuse avoidance metric.

Open questions include:

  • Per-user or per-group (need a generic way to manage lists of users then, but we kinda need that anyway)
  • Ignore invites, or all traffic from these users?
  • Can we build this into reputation analysis?

The use case here is that someone invites you to a chat, either with a nasty name or nasty contents after you accept the invite, and you never want to see them again.

(Imported from https://matrix.org/jira/browse/SPEC-123)

(Reported by @ara4n)

@matrixbot
Copy link
Member Author

Jira watchers: @ara4n

@matrixbot
Copy link
Member Author

matrixbot commented Mar 8, 2015

Links exported from Jira:

relates to #528

@matrixbot matrixbot added the p2 label Oct 28, 2016
@matrixbot matrixbot changed the title Ability to blacklist users from contacting you. Ability to blacklist users from contacting you. (SPEC-123) Oct 31, 2016
@matrixbot matrixbot added the feature Suggestion for a significant extension which needs considerable consideration label Nov 7, 2016
@ara4n
Copy link
Member

ara4n commented Nov 26, 2016

i /think/ this is covered by https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Jex7lDAwmv0KcgyL9oeGfUCsjw0CWSqedPKZ1ViSVis/edit (albeit conflated with #528)

@richvdh
Copy link
Member

richvdh commented Mar 6, 2018

I'm failing to grok how this was different from #528, so closing it now in the hope that if we've missed something, somebody will open a new issue clarifying what is still missing.

@richvdh richvdh closed this as completed Mar 6, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature Suggestion for a significant extension which needs considerable consideration p2
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants