Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Server-side ignore functionality (SPEC-202) #528

Closed
matrixbot opened this issue Jul 12, 2015 · 6 comments
Closed

Server-side ignore functionality (SPEC-202) #528

matrixbot opened this issue Jul 12, 2015 · 6 comments
Labels
p1 spec-omission implemented but not currently specified

Comments

@matrixbot
Copy link
Member

matrixbot commented Jul 12, 2015 •
edited
Loading

Whilst we can turn off notifications for a user, and #435 provides a way to stop them from inviting you, we don't have a way to just hide their events on the serverside.

(Imported from https://matrix.org/jira/browse/SPEC-202)

(Reported by @ara4n)
@matrixbot
Copy link
Member Author

Jira watchers: @ara4n

@matrixbot
Copy link
Member Author

matrixbot commented Jul 12, 2015 •
edited
Loading

Links exported from Jira:

relates to #435

@matrixbot
Copy link
Member Author

I ran into a situation today in Matrix HQ (not naming the user in the sake of not spreading this drama here) where such a server side ignore would be useful to resolve a situation involving said user. In general I think this is a blocker for deployment of Matrix to places.

-- Christine Dodrill

@matrixbot matrixbot added the p1 label Oct 28, 2016
@matrixbot matrixbot mentioned this issue Oct 28, 2016
Closed
@matrixbot matrixbot changed the title Server-side ignore functionality Server-side ignore functionality (SPEC-202) Oct 31, 2016
@matrixbot matrixbot added the feature Suggestion for a significant extension which needs considerable consideration label Nov 7, 2016
@ara4n
Copy link
Member

ara4n commented Nov 26, 2016

This got implemented ages ago based on https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Jex7lDAwmv0KcgyL9oeGfUCsjw0CWSqedPKZ1ViSVis/edit - however, we need to actually merge it into the spec!

@richvdh richvdh mentioned this issue Jan 17, 2017
Closed
@richvdh richvdh added spec-omission implemented but not currently specified and removed feature Suggestion for a significant extension which needs considerable consideration labels Jan 17, 2017
@macksting
Copy link

PLEASE. I just had to deal with a really irritating bit of drama from another user, and it'd be a great kindness to implement this so that I could avoid such things in the future. (copy/pasted from a related issue.)

turt2live added a commit to turt2live/matrix-doc that referenced this issue Mar 3, 2018
@turt2live
Spec ignoring users
791605e 
Adds matrix-org#528

Signed-off-by: Travis Ralston <[email protected]>
@turt2live turt2live mentioned this issue Mar 3, 2018
Merged
turt2live added a commit to turt2live/matrix-doc that referenced this issue Mar 3, 2018
@turt2live
Spec ignoring users
e862ef6 
Adds matrix-org#528

Signed-off-by: Travis Ralston <[email protected]>
@turt2live turt2live mentioned this issue Mar 5, 2018
Closed
@richvdh
Copy link
Member

richvdh commented Mar 6, 2018

fixed in #1142 thanks to @turt2live !

@richvdh richvdh closed this as completed Mar 6, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
p1 spec-omission implemented but not currently specified
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@ara4n @richvdh @matrixbot @macksting