fix: Weaker assert for protocol version for operations (#1800)

## What ❔

<!-- What are the changes this PR brings about? -->
<!-- Example: This PR adds a PR template to the repo. -->
<!-- (For bigger PRs adding more context is appreciated) -->

## Why ❔

<!-- Why are these changes done? What goal do they contribute to? What
are the principles behind them? -->
<!-- Example: PR templates ensure PR reviewers, observers, and future
iterators are in context about the evolution of repos. -->

## Checklist

<!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. -->
<!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. -->

- [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog
entries from PRs).
- [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated.
- [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated.
- [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
- [ ] Spellcheck has been run via `zk spellcheck`.
- [ ] Linkcheck has been run via `zk linkcheck`.

core/lib/zksync_core/src/eth_sender/eth_tx_aggregator.rs

@@ -427,10 +427,11 @@ impl EthTxAggregator {
         contracts_are_pre_shared_bridge: bool,
     ) -> TxData {
         let operation_is_pre_shared_bridge = op.protocol_version().is_pre_shared_bridge();
-        assert_eq!(
-            contracts_are_pre_shared_bridge,
-            operation_is_pre_shared_bridge
-        );
+
+        // The post shared bridge contracts support pre-shared bridge operations, but vice versa is not true.
+        if contracts_are_pre_shared_bridge {
+            assert!(operation_is_pre_shared_bridge);
+        }
 
         let mut args = vec![Token::Uint(self.rollup_chain_id.as_u64().into())];