Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat(vm): use zkevm v140 #393

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 2, 2023
Merged

feat(vm): use zkevm v140 #393

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 2, 2023

Conversation

Deniallugo
Copy link
Contributor

What ❔

use zk evm 1.4.0 for boojum

Why ❔

Checklist

  • PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs).
  • Tests for the changes have been added / updated.
  • Documentation comments have been added / updated.
  • Code has been formatted via zk fmt and zk lint.

@Deniallugo
Use zkevm 1.4.0
27eaf9b 
Signed-off-by: Danil <[email protected]>
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 2, 2023

Detected VM performance changes

Benchmark name Difference in runtime
call_far -13.7%
event_spam -6.1%
finish_eventful_frames -10.3%

@Deniallugo Deniallugo marked this pull request as ready for review November 2, 2023 17:01
@Deniallugo Deniallugo requested a review from a team as a code owner November 2, 2023 17:01
@Deniallugo Deniallugo merged commit 92d8235 into boojum-integration Nov 2, 2023
@Deniallugo Deniallugo deleted the deniallugo-use-zkevm-v140 branch November 2, 2023 17:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@Deniallugo