Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MM-54361 - Two cherry picks - #505 and #511 #534

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Oct 2, 2023

Conversation

cpoile
Copy link
Member

@cpoile cpoile commented Sep 27, 2023

Summary

Ticket Link

* remove isMobilePostGA code

* Revert "remove isMobilePostGA code"

This reverts commit 0ab4977.

* fix the crash
@cpoile cpoile added the 2: Dev Review Requires review by a core committer label Sep 27, 2023
@cpoile cpoile requested a review from streamer45 September 27, 2023 16:14
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 27, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (67d5dcf) 5.65% compared to head (1353af5) 5.72%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           release-0.17    #534      +/-   ##
===============================================
+ Coverage          5.65%   5.72%   +0.06%     
===============================================
  Files                22      22              
  Lines              4155    4157       +2     
===============================================
+ Hits                235     238       +3     
+ Misses             3903    3902       -1     
  Partials             17      17              
Files Coverage Δ
server/utils.go 29.00% <100.00%> (+2.19%) ⬆️
server/api.go 1.23% <0.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@cpoile
Copy link
Member Author

cpoile commented Sep 27, 2023

Looks like there's some issues with the recorder -- Jesse ran into a timeout when pressing record during the Dev meeting, he received a timeout after a minute or two. After pressing record a second time we got the confirmation almost instantly.

@streamer45
Copy link
Collaborator

Looks like there's some issues with the recorder -- Jesse ran into a timeout when pressing record during the Dev meeting, he received a timeout after a minute or two. After pressing record a second time we got the confirmation almost instantly.

Yeah, saw some failures alerts. Will look into it.

@streamer45 streamer45 added 3: Reviews Complete All reviewers have approved the pull request and removed 2: Dev Review Requires review by a core committer labels Sep 29, 2023
@cpoile
Copy link
Member Author

cpoile commented Oct 2, 2023

@streamer45 Sorry to bug you about it, but can we assume the recording e2e will pass if the recorder was working?

@streamer45
Copy link
Collaborator

@streamer45 Sorry to bug you about it, but can we assume the recording e2e will pass if the recorder was working?

We'll have to I think because we made breaking changes which would need us to run a previous calls-offloader version to make e2e pass. I can probably run those locally though just to make extra sure.

@cpoile
Copy link
Member Author

cpoile commented Oct 2, 2023

@streamer45 I think, given these minor changes don't touch anything recording related, we don't need to. I'll merge if you're okay with it.

@streamer45
Copy link
Collaborator

Alright, it should be safe 👍

@cpoile cpoile merged commit 6be0ae5 into release-0.17 Oct 2, 2023
@cpoile cpoile deleted the release-0.17-MM-54361-sec-fixes branch October 2, 2023 15:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3: Reviews Complete All reviewers have approved the pull request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants