Point content-visibility animation spec to css-contain-3 #21120
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
the
data:css
chrisdavidmills
approved these changes
Oct 31, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yup, this looks good to me. Thanks for digging this up @ddbeck! It was hard to find the spec references for some of these.
ddbeck
deleted the
2023-10-30-fix-content-visibility-animation-spec-url
branch
Elchi3
pushed a commit
to Elchi3/browser-compat-data
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 14, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'm not sure this is right, but the presently linked specification says nothing about
content-visibility, onlydisplayandvisibility. Meanwhile, CSS Containment Module Level 3 does cover the animation ofcontent-visibility(it was previously specified as not animatable).That said, it's possible that the original author of this data intended for the subfeature to cover something else. Perhaps @chrisdavidmills could review this change?
Related issues
This is a follow-up to changes made in #20671.
Prompted by a review on web-platform-dx/web-features#280.