Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(medusa): pricing module list prices return type #5715

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 26, 2023

Conversation

pKorsholm
Copy link
Contributor

What

  • remove price_set_money_amount from core return type when listing admin products using pricing module
  • always add price_list and price_list_id even if null to ensure consistency with core endpoints

@pKorsholm pKorsholm requested a review from a team as a code owner November 24, 2023 16:20
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Nov 24, 2023

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: c06fadb

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
@medusajs/medusa Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 24, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

3 Ignored Deployments
Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
api-reference ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Nov 24, 2023 4:20pm
docs-ui ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Nov 24, 2023 4:20pm
medusa-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Nov 24, 2023 4:20pm

@olivermrbl olivermrbl changed the title Fix(medusa): pricing module list prices return type fix(medusa): pricing module list prices return type Nov 26, 2023
@olivermrbl olivermrbl merged commit aa6c4cb into develop Nov 26, 2023
12 checks passed
@olivermrbl olivermrbl deleted the fix/pricing-module-list-prices-return-type branch November 26, 2023 16:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants