BIPM requested fixes 3: bibliography problem with the processing of Declarations

[ronaldtse]

From Michael Stock:

In the bibliography there seems to be a problem with the processing of Declarations – see for example references [65E/64F] and [74E/73F] – which are missing the format DECN as well as their details.

[opoudjis]

@anermina Many of these issues are going to need to be escalated to @andrew2net or myself, but you get to diagnose that first.

[anermina]

I assume DECN is written by mistake (related to Decisions), and this issue applies to DECL (Declarations).
However, I am not sure what is the expected output. Current outputs are as follows.

EN:

FR:

These entries seem as complete as REC entries, e.g.:

@ronaldtse can you please check what output Michael gets?

[anermina]

I do not see any issues with either Declarations or Decisions.

French:

English:

@ronaldtse could you please confirm this is the expected output?

[manuelfuenmayor]

Ping @ronaldtse, on this issue.

[ronaldtse]

In the original BIPM report from @MStock78120 , these are the problematic entries:

Issue 1

Problem (2023-05)

Now fixed

Issue 2

Problem (2023-05)

Now fixed

Unfortunately...

As you can see there is an issue with a # inserted into the declaration's description here:

The particular line originates from here:

• https://github.com/metanorma/bipm-data-outcomes/blob/eafca5cf19d3e19f63386d009e1a6a3cc0f40a35/cipm/meetings-fr/meeting-90.yml#L84

And it seems that it is actually a normal white space, so I don't know why it became a # (which typically indicates a missing glyph).

Ping @Intelligent2013 @andrew2net to fix this.

[ronaldtse]

Closing issue and keeping new issue separate.