Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: fix optional field filter in apply #909

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 9, 2024
Merged

fix: fix optional field filter in apply #909

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 9, 2024

Conversation

Natoandro
Copy link
Contributor

  • Fix the optional field filter on apply: resolve types before matching.

Migration notes

No migrations needed.


  • The change comes with new or modified tests
  • Hard-to-understand functions have explanatory comments
  • End-user documentation is updated to reflect the change

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 77.47%. Comparing base (2d177ec) to head (2db3df3).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #909   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   77.47%   77.47%           
=======================================
  Files         149      149           
  Lines       18333    18333           
  Branches     1786     1787    +1     
=======================================
  Hits        14203    14203           
  Misses       4107     4107           
  Partials       23       23           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Natoandro Natoandro merged commit d69f9ce into main Nov 9, 2024
13 checks passed
@Natoandro Natoandro deleted the fix-apply branch November 9, 2024 05:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants