Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add some telemetry for the (former) 0x162 assert. (#19415) - 7.4 #19423

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 1, 2024

Conversation

andre4i
Copy link
Contributor

@andre4i andre4i commented Jan 31, 2024

Description

ADO:7045

The assert doesn't tell us much about the context of the error. Converting this into a DataProcessingError.

I am aware that this is likely a data corruption incident, but technically it's a data processing error as the error happens when we process an op. The fact that the error doesn't recover leads to data corruption, but theoretically if a client would load a good summary, it may be able to recover.

Porting #19415 from main

## Description

ADO:7045

The assert doesn't tell us much about the context of the error.
Converting this into a `DataProcessingError`.

I am aware that this is likely a data corruption incident, but
technically it's a data processing error as the error happens when we
process an op. The fact that the error doesn't recover leads to data
corruption, but theoretically if a client would load a good summary, it
may be able to recover.

### After it is merged, I propose we backport this to 7.4.* and 8.0.*.
@andre4i andre4i requested a review from a team as a code owner January 31, 2024 22:12
@andre4i andre4i changed the title Add some telemetry for the (former) 0x162 assert. (#19415) Add some telemetry for the (former) 0x162 assert. (#19415) - 7.4 Jan 31, 2024
@msfluid-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Could not find a usable baseline build with search starting at CI c0aab16

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 95d8551

@andre4i andre4i merged commit 2d30111 into microsoft:release/v2int/7.4 Feb 1, 2024
22 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants