-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 322
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make parameter registration on instrument part of parameter init #3191
Make parameter registration on instrument part of parameter init #3191
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3191 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 65.92% 65.95% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 218 218
Lines 28943 28966 +23
==========================================
+ Hits 19082 19104 +22
- Misses 9861 9862 +1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Don't we want to advertize in the notebook that this way ofdeclaring parameters is now possible?) or is that left for further PRs?
Yes it needs some docs work before merging. I broke this out so that we could confirm individually that this is sound (the other pr breaks tests due to non related reasons) |
be5a378
to
7803335
Compare
7803335
to
9500c94
Compare
9500c94
to
c13137c
Compare
a74fe4c
to
351512f
Compare
ab55c75
to
8a2a18b
Compare
e57e32e
to
cdfc0ff
Compare
Co-authored-by: Mikhail Astafev <[email protected]>
29be8f9
to
fa071da
Compare
docs/examples/writing_drivers/Creating-Instrument-Drivers.ipynb
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Mikhail Astafev <[email protected]>
Such that parameters can be regular attributes on the instrument. This is lifted from #3188