Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert calling mypy with relatives paths (regression) #9502

Merged

Conversation

kimadeline
Copy link

Reverting #5834 for #9496.

🛠 Created #9501 as a work item to re-introduce the behaviour that #5834 was originally fixing.

  • Pull request represents a single change (i.e. not fixing disparate/unrelated things in a single PR)
  • Title summarizes what is changing
  • Has a news entry file (remember to thank yourself!)
  • Appropriate comments and documentation strings in the code
  • Has sufficient logging.
  • Has telemetry for enhancements.
  • Unit tests & system/integration tests are added/updated
  • Test plan is updated as appropriate
  • package-lock.json has been regenerated by running npm install (if dependencies have changed)
  • The wiki is updated with any design decisions/details.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jan 10, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #9502 into master will decrease coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is 0%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #9502      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   60.88%   60.85%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         530      530              
  Lines       28631    28648      +17     
  Branches     4340     4345       +5     
==========================================
  Hits        17433    17433              
- Misses      10245    10258      +13     
- Partials      953      957       +4
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/client/linters/mypy.ts 38.46% <0%> (-49.04%) ⬇️
src/client/interpreter/activation/service.ts 84.93% <0%> (-2.77%) ⬇️
...lient/datascience/jupyter/kernels/kernelService.ts 54.92% <0%> (-1.17%) ⬇️
src/client/common/process/proc.ts 15.21% <0%> (-0.23%) ⬇️
...rc/client/common/application/webPanels/webPanel.ts 13.63% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
src/client/common/constants.ts 100% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
src/client/common/process/types.ts 100% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
...atascience/interactive-window/interactiveWindow.ts 19.51% <0%> (+0.34%) ⬆️
src/client/common/process/pythonDaemonPool.ts 69.53% <0%> (+0.4%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 90f234f...dd0a590. Read the comment docs.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities (and Security Hotspot 0 Security Hotspots to review)
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@kimadeline kimadeline merged commit 6086c49 into microsoft:master Jan 10, 2020
@kimadeline kimadeline deleted the 9496-revert-mypy-relative-paths branch January 10, 2020 02:02
kimadeline added a commit to kimadeline/vscode-python that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2020
* Revert "fix(client/linters/mypy): call mypy incorrectly (microsoft#5834)"
This reverts commit 1b6fbfb.
* News file
* Revert "Fix MyPy CI tests (microsoft#8518)"
This reverts commit c634ffd.
kimadeline added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2020
* Revert calling mypy with relatives paths (regression) (#9502)
* Revert "fix(client/linters/mypy): call mypy incorrectly (#5834)"
This reverts commit 1b6fbfb.
* News file
* Revert "Fix MyPy CI tests (#8518)"
This reverts commit c634ffd.
* Disable conda execution service instantiation (#9493)
* Disable conda execution service instantiation
* News file
* Didn't mean to commit that
* Forgot a few tests
* Linting
* Update comment
* Linting
* Test failure caused by linting
* Undo tslint formatting change
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 17, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants