Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

General gitignore #35

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 13, 2023
Merged

General gitignore #35

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 13, 2023

Conversation

lukehinds
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Luke Hinds <[email protected]>
@lukehinds lukehinds merged commit 6543e96 into main Apr 13, 2023
@lukehinds lukehinds deleted the gitignore branch April 13, 2023 12:01
dmjb added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 18, 2024
Relates to #2845

Undo migration #35 after discussion with Ozz and Jakub this morning. We
want the provider class to store the concrete type of the provider, this
will be used by the ProviderFactory.

After studying the code, there does not appear to be any situation in
which this field will be null in the staging/prod DB.
@dmjb dmjb mentioned this pull request Apr 18, 2024
10 tasks
dmjb added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 18, 2024
Relates to #2845

Undo migration #35 after discussion with Ozz and Jakub this morning. We
want the provider class to store the concrete type of the provider, this
will be used by the ProviderFactory.

After studying the code, there does not appear to be any situation in
which this field will be null in the staging/prod DB.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant