-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix: don't export loudness info to Engine #11979
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Judging form t he variable name it needs to be_
Because the ReplayGain value is used as extra gain to have all tracks with the same loudness.
This means for instance normalized track has an average loudness of -18 LUFS (on a dB scale)
The replay Gain will be 0 for this track.
If the same track has a doubled sample voltage it has an average loudness of -12 LUFS, and the replay gain will be 0.5.
Applied this, we are back to the desired -18 LUFS.
Then the question is: What is the scale of average_loudness. Is it a ratio or a dB value?
But does it mean compared to the ReplayGain2 LUFS?
Do you have a set of tracks where the average_loudness has been set before we have messed it up with Mixxx?
Maybe we can spot a rule how it compares the the Mixxx Replay Gain column.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@daschuer This is indeed the purpose of upstream issue xsco/libdjinterop#103 - the exact meaning of
average_loudness
isn't currently clear.In the past, I had made an assumption that ReplayGain ratio was a good fit, but Denon players use the value to scale the waveforms, and the bug being fixed here is that some bad values cause the waveform to be scaled out of range, at which point it is no longer rendered.
I've been working through more methodically with an analysis suite of tracks to try and determine the exact meaning of the fields in Engine format. When we have confidence in the true meaning of the fields, we can come back to Mixxx and set the value properly.