Upgrade base torchio version

[scap3yvt]

Fixes #N.A.

Proposed Changes

Checklist

• I have read the CONTRIBUTING guide.
• My PR is based from the current GaNDLF master .
• Non-breaking change (does not break existing functionality): provide as many details as possible for any breaking change.
• Function/class source code documentation added/updated.
• Code has been blacked for style consistency.
• If applicable, version information has been updated in GANDLF/version.py.
• If adding a git submodule, add to list of exceptions for black styling in pyproject.toml file.
• Usage documentation has been updated, if appropriate.
• Tests added or modified to cover the changes; if coverage is reduced, please give explanation.
• If customized dependency installation is required (i.e., a separate pip install step is needed for PR to be functional), please ensure it is reflected in all the files that control the CI, namely: python-test.yml, and all docker files [1,2,3].

[github-actions]

MLCommons CLA bot All contributors have signed the MLCommons CLA ✍️ ✅

[sarthakpati]

LGTM pending tests

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (b6a73fb) 94.67% compared to head (020a6f7) 94.68%.
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

❗ Current head 020a6f7 differs from pull request most recent head 5a3cbc1. Consider uploading reports for the commit 5a3cbc1 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #749      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.67%   94.68%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         117      117              
  Lines        8242     8242              
==========================================
+ Hits         7803     7804       +1     
+ Misses        439      438       -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	94.68% <100.00%> (+0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sarthakpati]

hey @hasan7n @aristizabal95 - do you know why the git error is coming for the MLCube test?

/usr/bin/git rev-parse --show-toplevel
/home/runner/work/GaNDLF/GaNDLF
/usr/bin/git diff --diff-filter=D --name-only b5a41c946775e89f9b2266bcb8f5d58e4dc45d48...845c91e61701591ee438cfe05d79bcd8f7523134
fatal: b5a41c946775e89f9b2266bcb8f5d58e4dc45d48...845c91e61701591ee438cfe05d79bcd8f7523134: no merge base
Error: The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 128

[aristizabal95]

@sarthakpati I couldn't find any commit with hash 845c91e61701591ee438cfe05d79bcd8f7523134 anywhere. I have no idea why that action is using that non-existent hash and where it comes from. At least from the workflow file I can't find a way we could be passing wrong information to the action, so this most probably means a bug in the action code itself?

[sarthakpati]

@sarthakpati I couldn't find any commit with hash 845c91e61701591ee438cfe05d79bcd8f7523134 anywhere. I have no idea why that action is using that non-existent hash and where it comes from. At least from the workflow file I can't find a way we could be passing wrong information to the action, so this most probably means a bug in the action code itself?

Oh okay. What would be the solution for this, then?

UPDATE: I guess pushing a new hash just worked 🙄

[sarthakpati]

LGTM pending tests