Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use num::BigInt instead of i128 in constants, as constants can be of arbitrary size. #141

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 21, 2021

Conversation

danielsn
Copy link
Contributor

@danielsn danielsn commented May 21, 2021

Description of changes:

Describe RMC's current behavior and how your code changes that behavior. If there are no issues this PR is resolving, explain why this change is necessary.

Resolved issues:

Resolves #140

Call-outs:

Testing:

  • How is this change tested? Added new regression test

  • Is this a refactor change? No

Checklist

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made
  • Methods or procedures are documented
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 and MIT licenses.

[[package]]
name = "num-integer"
version = "0.1.43"
version = "0.1.44"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this bump necessary for num-bitint 0.4.0? Will this make future upstreams trickier?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good question. Realistically, I think we can accept any version. We can always change this if there is a problem when doing upstreaming.

@danielsn danielsn merged commit 12bee91 into model-checking:main-152-2021-05-18 May 21, 2021
@danielsn danielsn deleted the use-bignum branch May 21, 2021 23:25
adpaco-aws pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 26, 2021
adpaco-aws pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2021
adpaco-aws pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2021
adpaco-aws pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2021
adpaco-aws pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 23, 2021
adpaco-aws pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 2, 2021
adpaco-aws pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2021
adpaco-aws pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2021
adpaco-aws pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2021
adpaco-aws pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2021
@zhassan-aws zhassan-aws mentioned this pull request Aug 6, 2021
4 tasks
adpaco-aws pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2021
adpaco-aws pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2021
adpaco-aws pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 24, 2021
celinval pushed a commit to celinval/kani-dev that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2021
tedinski pushed a commit to tedinski/rmc that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2022
tedinski pushed a commit to tedinski/rmc that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2022
tedinski pushed a commit to tedinski/rmc that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2022
tedinski pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

RMC can't handle u128 constants
3 participants