-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 101
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use num::BigInt instead of i128 in constants, as constants can be of arbitrary size. #141
Use num::BigInt instead of i128 in constants, as constants can be of arbitrary size. #141
Conversation
[[package]] | ||
name = "num-integer" | ||
version = "0.1.43" | ||
version = "0.1.44" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this bump necessary for num-bitint
0.4.0? Will this make future upstreams trickier?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good question. Realistically, I think we can accept any version. We can always change this if there is a problem when doing upstreaming.
Description of changes:
Describe RMC's current behavior and how your code changes that behavior. If there are no issues this PR is resolving, explain why this change is necessary.
Resolved issues:
Resolves #140
Call-outs:
Testing:
How is this change tested? Added new regression test
Is this a refactor change? No
Checklist
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 and MIT licenses.