-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PATO quality node page on next.monarchinitiative.org shows NSAID to pathway associations #42
Comments
Here's a snippet of the api response that populates this table:
|
Nope this makes no sense at all (the fact that this drug shows up as a quality). This should be moved to the PHENIO repo and fixed asap by Harry; most likely, PATO quality has a faulty top level wiring from one of the participating ontologies. |
I will transfer to PHENIO and check on this |
It might be that it's the only drug with an association that we show. Also, I knew this issue would need those visualizations from oak but I didn't know how to make them, @caufieldjh, could you add the commands you used to generate them if you still have that handy? |
What's even stranger is that in KG-Phenio, CHEBI:35475 is Are these derived from PHENIO or KG-Phenio, and which version? |
Oh yeah, something like the following works:
Add |
I believe it's 20230822, since this is my build from 2023-08-24, but I can't be 100% confident that there isn't some kind of timezone shenanigans going on that would have let me get a 20230825 phenio into a 2023-08-24 monarch-kg. (I mean, probably not, unless you've moved your build process to New Zealand 🤔 ) -- edit to add, it would be great to capture version info for sources, maybe even just as a node/edge property |
I skimmed. I think there are two things going on here:
So this is just funny names AFAICT |
@cmungall What should we do practically here? should we merge chebi role and pato quality explicitly in phenio? That seems a bit.. strong? |
The original link doesn't work but this does: https://monarchinitiative.org/PATO:0000001#chemical-to-pathway |
This is odd, but maybe fine? Does this look like something odd in phenio @matentzn or is it expected? (I'm assuming the d2p and g2p associations are expected)
http://next.monarchinitiative.org/node/PATO:0000001?associations=biolink:ChemicalToPathwayAssociation
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: