Add some notes about landing strings early in feature development.

[mikeconley]

This is based on some conversations I've had with @bcolsson and @flodolo recently about the New Tab team's intent to ship more quickly, and thought it'd be worth adding to the documentation.

[bcolsson]

Thanks for adding this @mikeconley - I had some thoughts and provided a couple suggestions to get the conversation started. I think in general our stance is that unless there's a good reason, people should be landing strings at the same time as the other changes.

[mikeconley]

Thanks for adding this @mikeconley - I had some thoughts and provided a couple suggestions to get the conversation started. I think in general our stance is that unless there's a good reason, people should be landing strings at the same time as the other changes.

Should we provide some examples of what would qualify as good reasons?

[bcolsson]

Thanks for adding this @mikeconley - I had some thoughts and provided a couple suggestions to get the conversation started. I think in general our stance is that unless there's a good reason, people should be landing strings at the same time as the other changes.

Should we provide some examples of what would qualify as good reasons?

Good point, though at this point I can only think of one example where we are considering this, so I think we can use your proposed use case (features releasing outside of the normal train release model) as an example.