Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Criteria for “Lab” to move to “Core” #21221

Closed
obillwan opened this issue May 27, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Criteria for “Lab” to move to “Core” #21221

obillwan opened this issue May 27, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@obillwan
Copy link

In the "Lab" section, is it possible to modify or remove the first criteria for a component to be ready to move to the core?

  • [x ] I have searched the issues of this repository and believe that this is not a duplicate.

Summary 💡

The first criteria says that a "Lab" component "needs to be used" in order to be moved into the "core" components. However, there is a "catch-22" with the criteria. Most companies (or users) are not going to feel comfortable using these components until they are in the core, so therefore, the Google analytics stats are never going to see usage, and so the component may never be move to the "core". Our company really wants to use several of these "Lab" components. Please let us know if anything can be done to change / remove this first criteria.

Examples 🌈

Motivation 🔦

Our company really wants to use several of these "Lab" components. Please let us know if anything can be done to change / remove this first criteria.

@oliviertassinari
Copy link
Member

From our experience so far, the lab doesn't stop people from using the components. We are good. We have seen great adoption from some of the components in the lab, enough to give us confidence it's valuable.

@oliviertassinari
Copy link
Member

Regarding what we plan, #19448 (comment) is still up-to-date. We have no plan to drop any of the components that are in the lab. A good chunk of them will be made stable in v5. The Tree View is the one that lags the most behind. We still have paid enterprise features to build on top of the existing MIT ones: drag & drop, checkboxes, multi-selection.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants