Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

updated README.md since cl_napalm_test has been deprecated #702

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 21, 2018
Merged

updated README.md since cl_napalm_test has been deprecated #702

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 21, 2018

Conversation

viniarck
Copy link
Contributor

Since cl_napalm_test has been deprecated, I believe the README.md should tell users to use the napalm cli by calling get_facts to verify the connection, right? What do you guys say?

Thanks!

@dbarrosop dbarrosop self-requested a review April 21, 2018 12:21
@dbarrosop
Copy link
Member

Yeah, LGTM. Thanks! :D

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 79.074% when pulling 4be583a on viniciusarcanjo:readme_clnapalm into a376387 on napalm-automation:develop.

2 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 79.074% when pulling 4be583a on viniciusarcanjo:readme_clnapalm into a376387 on napalm-automation:develop.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Apr 21, 2018

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 79.074% when pulling 4be583a on viniciusarcanjo:readme_clnapalm into a376387 on napalm-automation:develop.

@dbarrosop dbarrosop merged commit b6bdd45 into napalm-automation:develop Apr 21, 2018
ExaneServerTeam pushed a commit to ExaneServerTeam/napalm that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants