Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can not transfer to a contract #197

Closed
luc10921 opened this issue Dec 16, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #245
Closed

Can not transfer to a contract #197

luc10921 opened this issue Dec 16, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #245
Assignees

Comments

@luc10921
Copy link

luc10921 commented Dec 16, 2021

Trying to use neoxp transfer 1 gas alice #smartcontract will not work and sends the following error message: System.Exception: #smartcontract account not found.
Trying to do the opposite neoxp transfer 1 gas #smartcontract alice, will also not work, and it asks: enter password for #smartcontact and then it send the following error: System.Exception: #smartcontract sender not found.

@devhawk devhawk added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 16, 2021
@devhawk
Copy link
Contributor

devhawk commented Dec 16, 2021

I don't think we can support using a contract as a Sender, but we should be able to support it as a receiver.

@devhawk devhawk removed the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 15, 2022
@devhawk devhawk self-assigned this Aug 15, 2022
devhawk pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 15, 2022
devhawk added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 15, 2022
* enable transfer to contract via `#` prefix
Fixes #197

* update changelog

Co-authored-by: Harry <[email protected]>
devhawk added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 15, 2022
* enable transfer to contract via `#` prefix
Fixes #197

* update changelog

Co-authored-by: Harry <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants