Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Parameter Selector Display option #274
Parameter Selector Display option #274
Changes from 2 commits
7127530
da41787
52da34c
195d215
5255fab
00a5b95
d6c46f1
d9cb350
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suggest to move the ternary
caseSensitive ? "" : "toLower"
out of the string and to place it in a const on line 118.5 in order to be able to reuse it on line 129We can also directly replace the line 118 by something like:
const toLowerOrEmptyString = (settings.caseSensitive || false) ? "" : "toLower";
or maybe in two lines for more readability, one with the caseSensitive const definition and the second to define the "toLower" constWhat do you think of the template string style with ${} ? Can maybe be more readable than the "" + "" synthax but not sure here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Idem for this DISTINCT and the fact of reusing it on line 131
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In my opinion this code can be moved in a dedicated function in order to have a more readable component, what do you think ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here too