-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
NETOBSERV-1869 PoC on UDN UI #625
Conversation
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #625 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 55.96% 49.98% -5.99%
==========================================
Files 193 37 -156
Lines 9491 3155 -6336
Branches 1215 0 -1215
==========================================
- Hits 5312 1577 -3735
+ Misses 3802 1413 -2389
+ Partials 377 165 -212
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
New image: It will expire after two weeks. To deploy this build, run from the operator repo, assuming the operator is running: USER=netobserv VERSION=4f7a60c make set-plugin-image |
New image: It will expire after two weeks. To deploy this build, run from the operator repo, assuming the operator is running: USER=netobserv VERSION=a8ecf29 make set-plugin-image |
PR needs rebase. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Closing this as followups been created: |
Description
This is a PoC around UDN improvements in netobserv UI using mock data.
You can run this UI locally using:
Implementations:
We need to decide how to store the UDN info. These can be namespaced so it will be good to have both Name + Namespace in two separate fields as we did for other K8S enrichments.
Or maybe we could reuse SrcK8S_Namespace ?
Dependencies
netobserv/netobserv-ebpf-agent#438
netobserv/flowlogs-pipeline#743
/!\ DO NOT MERGE THIS /!
I'll split that PR so we can merge feature by feature 😸