-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement checks for unannotated categorical column values + unused annotated missing values #115
Conversation
…n the data dictionary - removed asst of test runner output to a variable for tests that don't use the result object
…e phenotypic file
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 4686162992
💛 - Coveralls |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me @alyssadai! I think we should keep the tests a bit more loose with respect to the exact warning message we throw (left comments) so we keep them focused more on the functionality than the exact implementation.
I also left some 🍒 comments for you to consider.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great, good to go 🧑🍳
Closes #107, closes #109
Two new examples also added for testing, example 9 (.tsv has unannotated categorical column values) and 10 (.json has unused
"MissingValues"
). Minor noticed typos also fixed.