-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 42
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Some fixes before the upcoming release #257
Changes from 19 commits
76971c3
d1f8d3b
6520455
10e365e
a72c18b
fbb214a
c6a8353
158cc1c
242cf96
088b0f9
b25f1fc
3d0f1c2
04ae35d
74d7acb
c024383
cab1c01
04eac80
f1afb24
dac77c9
8750d89
d9fd29a
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1 +1,8 @@ | ||
repository_type: pipeline | ||
lint: | ||
nextflow_config: | ||
- config_defaults: | ||
- params.logo_file | ||
- params.css_file | ||
- params.citations_file | ||
- params.report_file |
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Re-writing this process in Python is a quite a major change to smuggle into a PR of small fixes ;-).
Can you say why the process was re-written, and demonstrate that the output is the same relative to previous?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you prefer, I can also do the module change in a separate PR, that's not a problem!
Nope, can't demonstrate that, the output changed; it was incorrect before, that's why I had to change it :') AWK suddenly filtered out all the genes and just produced an empty table (was not the case when I originally added the module).
I tried a lot to change it in AWK but it simply did not work and I have to be honest, I found the AWK code quite painful to deal with as I'm simply not experienced enough with it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, but as a follow-up, I did check the output. The new module + this code makes it so that the results are the same as the DE genes according to the html report, see here:
filtered_results.zip
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, could you raise this as a separate PR? I think that would make more sense and you can post the reasoning and the evidence there.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes of course, see #264