Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactoring network into swarm, rate limiting and network types #2563

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 7, 2024

Conversation

ii-cruz
Copy link
Member

@ii-cruz ii-cruz commented Jun 5, 2024

What's in this pull request?

Simple code relocation to new files. The network.rs was huge and really hard to work with.

Pull request checklist

  • All tests pass. The project builds and runs.
  • I have resolved any merge conflicts.
  • I have resolved all clippy and rustfmt warnings.

@ii-cruz ii-cruz added enhancement New feature or request refactor Refactoring of some component labels Jun 5, 2024
@ii-cruz ii-cruz self-assigned this Jun 5, 2024
@ii-cruz ii-cruz changed the title Refactoring network into swam, rate limiting and network types Refactoring network into swarm, rate limiting and network types Jun 5, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@hrxi hrxi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have not verified that the files weren't changed except for visibility specifiers.

@hrxi hrxi force-pushed the iicruz/refactor_network branch from d02181e to 35da796 Compare June 6, 2024 11:08
@hrxi
Copy link
Contributor

hrxi commented Jun 6, 2024

Rebasing to merge.

@hrxi hrxi merged commit 35da796 into albatross Jun 7, 2024
6 checks passed
@hrxi hrxi deleted the iicruz/refactor_network branch June 7, 2024 07:38
@jsdanielh jsdanielh added this to the Nimiq PoS Mainnet milestone Jun 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request refactor Refactoring of some component
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants