modernize obsplus packaging

[d-chambers]

This PR tries to bring obsplus into compliance with best packaging practices in 2023. Specifically:

1. Removes setup.py in favor of pyproject.toml (also removes all requirements.txt files)
2. Moves the source code to an src folder as recommended by the python packaging authority
3. Removes versioneer in favor of setuptools-git-versioning
4. Includes support for python 3.11

[d-chambers]

Hey @sboltz ,

While you are looking at ObsPlus, what do you think of these changes?

[shawnboltz]

Hey @sboltz ,

While you are looking at ObsPlus, what do you think of these changes?

I'm fine with these changes. The only thing, and this might be (probably was) user error on my part, is that for one of my personal projects I recently tried setting it up with the src/ folder and PyCharm got ten kinds of confused when trying to auto-import things for me. That being said, I initially installed the project wrong so it may have just been a whoops in my environment.

[d-chambers]

... PyCharm got ten kinds of confused

I haven't had any issues with several projects I am working on that now follow this style. Maybe just deleting the .idea folder the restarting pycharm would fix it?

Ok, I will wait until #260 gets merged, rebase, then merge this. Anything else we want to do before another minor release? After adding py11 support it would make sense to do a release sooner rather than later.

[shawnboltz]

Maybe. Using the library works fine, it was just trying to get it to auto import, from say, the utils module into another file in the project that would confuse it, so that seems like a plausible fix. From: Derrick Chambers ***@***.***> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2023 3:17 PM To: niosh-mining/obsplus ***@***.***> Cc: Boltz, M. Shawn (CDC/NIOSH/SMRD/MSB) ***@***.***>; Comment ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [niosh-mining/obsplus] modernize obsplus packaging (PR #259) ... PyCharm got ten kinds of confused I haven't had any issues with several projects I am working on that now follow this style. Maybe just deleting the .idea folder would do it? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#259 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARQXFLVMIJBHQVKHHJ2LCKLW4TPG3ANCNFSM6AAAAAAVDJ4DT4>. You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.******@***.***>>

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 71.42% and project coverage change: -1.26 ⚠️

Comparison is base (71932a0) 97.83% compared to head (8cfb761) 96.58%.

📣 This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #259      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.83%   96.58%   -1.26%     
==========================================
  Files          39       44       +5     
  Lines        4673     4806     +133     
  Branches      669      675       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits         4572     4642      +70     
- Misses         44      108      +64     
+ Partials       57       56       -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	96.58% <71.42%> (-1.26%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/obsplus/bank/__init__.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/obsplus/bank/core.py	98.08% <ø> (ø)
src/obsplus/bank/eventbank.py	99.54% <ø> (ø)
src/obsplus/bank/stationbank.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/obsplus/bank/wavebank.py	96.83% <ø> (ø)
src/obsplus/constants.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/obsplus/datasets/__init__.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/obsplus/datasets/bingham_test.py	55.55% <ø> (ø)
src/obsplus/datasets/crandall_test.py	61.11% <ø> (ø)
src/obsplus/datasets/dataset.py	98.26% <ø> (ø)
... and 34 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.