-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: rename regression tests #17948
Conversation
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ | |||
'use strict'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This appears (in GitHub) to be new rather than renamed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@richardlau Yes, I had to split test-regress-GH-12371
into two tests to properly rename it. Thinking about it, I should probably have done that when I originally wrote the regression test for #12371.
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ | |||
'use strict'; | |||
// Just test that destroying stdin doesn't mess up listening on a server. | |||
// This is a regression test for GH-746. | |||
// This is a regression test for | |||
// https://github.com/nodejs/node-v0.x-archive/issues/746. | |||
|
|||
const common = require('../common'); | |||
const net = require('net'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggestion: rename it to "test-net-..." because http is not used here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
❤️ 🎉 🤘
PR-URL: nodejs#17948 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Landed in fb6e980 |
PR-URL: #17948 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #17948 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #17948 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #17948 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #17948 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #17948 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #17948 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #17948 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
The current regression test names (
test-regress-GH-<ID>
) are not self-explanatory. I would prefer to use more descriptive names, especially as some of the referenced issues are from the old repository, but I am not sure whether that's a good idea.Until answered, I just renamed some of the more obvious regression tests.
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
test