Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add dependency review #5662

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 29, 2023
Merged

Conversation

UlisesGascon
Copy link
Member

Refs: #5659

@UlisesGascon UlisesGascon requested a review from a team as a code owner August 22, 2023 10:25
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Aug 22, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
nodejs-org ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Aug 26, 2023 2:14pm

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 22, 2023

📦 Next.js Bundle Analysis for nodejs.org

This analysis was generated by the Next.js Bundle Analysis action. 🤖

This PR introduced no changes to the JavaScript bundle! 🙌

Copy link
Member

@ovflowd ovflowd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We already have GitHub's built-in dependency scanning.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Unit Test Coverage Report

Lines Statements Branches Functions
Coverage: 93%
92.21% (367/398) 79% (79/100) 88.09% (74/84)

Unit Test Report

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
45 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 8.45s ⏱️

Signed-off-by: Claudio Wunder <[email protected]>
@ovflowd ovflowd added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 29, 2023
Merged via the queue into nodejs:main with commit 490f82e Aug 29, 2023
@UlisesGascon UlisesGascon deleted the feat/added-dependency-review branch September 2, 2023 08:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants