Relationship to private security activities #2
Conversation
|
👍 |
|
LGTM |
|
Is there concern that people won't read that and assume that this repo is where they should report security issues? Might there be a better name for the repo/wg? |
|
I should clarify that my questions above are not objections. This can totally land if it's all LGTMs and stuff. If anyone does want to consider a different name, perhaps something like "security policy wg" might be slightly better than just "security wg" even if it doesn't cover everything the wg will do. |
|
I think Rich has a good point. If the first line is "dont report security issues here" the naming could probably be improved. Never the less, wording is LGTM. |
|
LGTM with rename to "Security policy wg" |
|
This is landable, but I don't have access rights to do so. I annotated with the landing meta-data: https://github.com/sam-github/security-wg/commit/91f263c3a3d8a5a86d0e66a61fe9bba9b552b131 @rvagg can you land? |
PR-URL: #2 Reviewed-By: Сковорода Никита Андреевич <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Johan Bergström <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
|
Landed in 28ae71a |
PR-URL: nodejs/security-wg#2 Reviewed-By: Сковорода Никита Андреевич <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Johan Bergström <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
PR-URL: nodejs/security-wg#2 Reviewed-By: Сковорода Никита Андреевич <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Johan Bergström <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Proposed relationship and wording for that relationship. Comments?
/cc @nodejs/security