Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

multilable_with_auxiliary_learner #83

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Feb 14, 2017
Merged

multilable_with_auxiliary_learner #83

merged 12 commits into from
Feb 14, 2017

Conversation

yangarbiter
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Feb 6, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #83 into master will increase coverage by 0.38%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #83      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage    87.1%   87.48%   +0.38%     
==========================================
  Files          26       27       +1     
  Lines         814      895      +81     
==========================================
+ Hits          709      783      +74     
- Misses        105      112       +7
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
libact/models/svm.py 85.71% <ø> (+14.28%)
libact/base/interfaces.py 75% <100%> (+1.66%)
libact/models/multilabel/dummy_clf.py 100% <100%> (ø)
libact/query_strategies/multilabel/init.py 100% <100%> (ø)
libact/models/multilabel/binary_relevance.py 76.81% <57.14%> (+3%)
...es/multilabel/multilable_with_auxiliary_learner.py 89.79% <89.79%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7212a2b...6803eb2. Read the comment docs.

@yangarbiter yangarbiter merged commit 3c1f799 into master Feb 14, 2017
@yangarbiter yangarbiter deleted the MLALAL branch February 14, 2017 06:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants