Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: container-type level version compatibility check #140

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 26, 2024

Conversation

KeranYang
Copy link
Member

@KeranYang KeranYang requested a review from yhl25 September 26, 2024 02:05
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 26, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 97.56098% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Please upload report for BASE (main@f66f67c). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
.../java/io/numaproj/numaflow/info/ContainerType.java 92.85% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #140   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   60.41%           
  Complexity      ?      364           
=======================================
  Files           ?      122           
  Lines           ?     2448           
  Branches        ?      169           
=======================================
  Hits            ?     1479           
  Misses          ?      840           
  Partials        ?      129           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

.
Signed-off-by: Keran Yang <[email protected]>
Comment on lines 18 to 22
FBSINKER("fb-sinker"),
UNKNOWN("unknown");

private final String name;

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need to support UNKNOWN?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, I put it mainly for error scenarios.

yhl25
yhl25 previously approved these changes Sep 26, 2024
@yhl25 yhl25 dismissed their stale review September 26, 2024 03:24

As discussed, lets not go extract the container type from the server info file path. We can pass it as an argument from each component.

.
Signed-off-by: Keran Yang <[email protected]>
@KeranYang KeranYang merged commit babc8e1 into numaproj:main Sep 26, 2024
5 checks passed
@KeranYang KeranYang deleted the gvc branch September 26, 2024 03:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants