Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix multiple raters selection strategy #1030

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

epugh
Copy link
Member

@epugh epugh commented Jun 4, 2024

Description

Motivation and Context

we say we limit to three raters, but we don't actually enforce it!

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots or GIFs (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • [] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • [] Improvement (non-breaking change which improves existing functionality)
  • [] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality)
  • [] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • [] My code follows the code style of this project.
  • [] My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • [] I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • [] I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • [] I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • [] All new and existing tests passed.

wrigleyDan and others added 4 commits May 24, 2024 17:42
…ry to only take query doc pairs into account with fewer than three judgements.

Not working at the moment, I think the select statement selects from the wrong tabel, model, whatever.
@epugh
Copy link
Member Author

epugh commented Jun 7, 2024

Fixed instead in #1032

@epugh epugh closed this Jun 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants