Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix format for block traces on debug API #557

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 19, 2024

Conversation

m-Peter
Copy link
Collaborator

@m-Peter m-Peter commented Sep 18, 2024

Closes: #539

Description


For contributor use:

  • Targeted PR against master branch
  • Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Code follows the standards mentioned here.
  • Updated relevant documentation
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer
  • Added appropriate labels

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced transaction tracing with detailed error feedback through a new data structure, improving debugging capabilities.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved error handling for transaction tracing failures, providing clearer insights into issues.

@m-Peter m-Peter added this to the Flow-EVM-M2 milestone Sep 18, 2024
@m-Peter m-Peter self-assigned this Sep 18, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 18, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new data structure, txTraceResult, to encapsulate transaction trace results, including transaction hashes, results, and error messages. The TraceBlockByNumber and TraceBlockByHash methods in the DebugAPI class have been updated to return slices of txTraceResult instead of raw JSON. This modification enhances error handling by providing detailed feedback on transaction tracing failures.

Changes

Files Change Summary
api/debug.go Added txTraceResult struct; modified TraceBlockByNumber and TraceBlockByHash methods to return slices of txTraceResult.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Transaction hash inclusion in response format (Issue #539)
Response structure alignment with EVM node format (Issue #539)

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

Improvement

Suggested reviewers

  • peterargue
  • sideninja

Poem

In the realm of code where bunnies play,
A new trace structure hops in today.
With hashes and results, oh what a delight,
Debugging transactions, all errors in sight!
So let’s trace the blocks, with joy and with cheer,
For clearer paths forward, the future is near! 🐇✨


Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f3f1838 and 6c63ab9.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • api/debug.go (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (6)
api/debug.go (6)

16-21: LGTM!

The txTraceResult struct is well-defined with appropriate fields, types, and JSON tags. The omitempty tag on the Result and Error fields ensures they are excluded from the JSON output when empty, keeping the response concise.


57-60: LGTM!

The changes to the TraceBlockByNumber method signature and error handling are appropriate. Returning a slice of *txTraceResult provides a more structured response, and using the handleError function with the correct type parameter ensures consistent error handling.


63-69: LGTM!

The logic for tracing individual transactions and populating the results slice is implemented correctly. Initializing the slice with the appropriate length ensures proper indexing, and assigning txTraceResult instances with either the trace result or error message provides comprehensive information for each transaction.


79-82: LGTM!

The changes to the TraceBlockByHash method signature and error handling are appropriate. Returning a slice of *txTraceResult provides a more structured response, and using the handleError function with the correct type parameter ensures consistent error handling.


85-91: LGTM!

The logic for tracing individual transactions and populating the results slice is implemented correctly. Initializing the slice with the appropriate length ensures proper indexing, and assigning txTraceResult instances with either the trace result or error message provides comprehensive information for each transaction.


Line range hint 16-91: Excellent work on enhancing the debug API!

The introduction of the txTraceResult struct and the modifications to the TraceBlockByNumber and TraceBlockByHash methods significantly improve the structure and informativeness of the trace results. Returning a slice of *txTraceResult allows for better handling and processing of the results, making it easier for consumers of the API to work with the data.

The updated logic for tracing individual transactions ensures that both successful traces and errors are captured and returned appropriately, providing comprehensive information for debugging purposes. The consistent use of the handleError function for error handling enhances code maintainability and readability.

Overall, these changes align well with the objectives of improving the debug API and addressing the issues raised in the linked GitHub issue. Great job!


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@devbugging devbugging merged commit d399673 into main Sep 19, 2024
2 checks passed
@m-Peter m-Peter deleted the fix-format-for-block-traces branch September 23, 2024 10:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: ✅ Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

debug_traceBlockByHash returning incorrect format when compared to evm node format
2 participants