-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Relax required flags when index-only
mode is set
#715
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to handle the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
services/requester/requester.go (2)
126-143
: Consider restructuring error handling for better readability.While the logic is correct, the error handling could be more concise.
Consider this alternative structure:
if !config.IndexOnly { - address := config.COAAddress - acc, err := client.GetAccount(context.Background(), address) - if err != nil { - return nil, fmt.Errorf( - "could not fetch the configured COA account: %s make sure it exists: %w", - address.String(), - err, - ) - } - - if acc.Balance < minFlowBalance { - return nil, fmt.Errorf( - "COA account must be funded with at least %d Flow, but has balance of: %d", - minFlowBalance, - acc.Balance, - ) - } + acc, err := client.GetAccount(context.Background(), config.COAAddress) + if err != nil { + return nil, fmt.Errorf("could not fetch the configured COA account: %s make sure it exists: %w", + config.COAAddress.String(), err) + } + if acc.Balance < minFlowBalance { + return nil, fmt.Errorf("COA account must be funded with at least %d Flow, but has balance of: %d", + minFlowBalance, acc.Balance) + } }
Line range hint
93-152
: Well-structured implementation of the index-only mode feature.The changes across the three files form a cohesive implementation that:
- Properly validates flags only when needed
- Prevents unnecessary account operations
- Maintains proper separation of concerns
- Follows a consistent pattern for conditional checks
The implementation successfully achieves the PR objective of relaxing flag requirements in index-only mode while maintaining proper validation in normal mode.
Also applies to: 203-226, 126-143
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
bootstrap/bootstrap.go
(1 hunks)cmd/run/cmd.go
(1 hunks)services/requester/requester.go
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
cmd/run/cmd.go (1)
93-152
: LGTM! The conditional validation logic is well-structured.
The code correctly groups related validations (coinbase, COA address, wallet key) within the IndexOnly
check while keeping the gas price validation outside, as it's needed for both modes.
bootstrap/bootstrap.go (1)
203-226
: LGTM! The account operations are properly conditioned.
The code correctly:
- Wraps account retrieval and signer creation in the
IndexOnly
check - Maintains proper error handling
- Keeps keystore initialization accessible for both modes
5954739
to
bb3ec18
Compare
bb3ec18
to
26ac208
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
bootstrap/bootstrap.go (1)
203-203
: Add a comment explaining the IndexOnly condition.Consider adding a comment explaining why these operations are skipped in index-only mode to improve code maintainability.
+ // Skip account and signer initialization in index-only mode + // as they are only required when accepting transactions if !b.config.IndexOnly {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
bootstrap/bootstrap.go
(1 hunks)cmd/run/cmd.go
(1 hunks)services/requester/requester.go
(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- services/requester/requester.go
- cmd/run/cmd.go
🔇 Additional comments (1)
bootstrap/bootstrap.go (1)
203-226
: LGTM! Verify downstream handling of empty accountKeys.
The conditional block correctly implements the PR objective by skipping account retrieval and signer creation in index-only mode. This change appropriately relaxes the requirements for coa-address
and related flags.
Let's verify that downstream code properly handles empty accountKeys:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more context about the usage of accountKeys
to ensure comprehensive verification.
Based on the gathered context, I can now provide the final response:
Verified: Empty accountKeys are properly handled in index-only mode
The codebase correctly handles empty accountKeys in index-only mode through multiple safeguards:
- The requester service checks
IndexOnly
flag before attempting account operations - API endpoints properly return
ErrIndexOnlyMode
when transaction submission is attempted - The keystore initialization with empty accountKeys is safe as it's only used when needed
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if there are any direct accountKeys.length assumptions
# or if accountKeys is used without checking IndexOnly mode
# Search for direct length checks or array access
rg -A 3 "len\(accountKeys\)|accountKeys\[|accountKeys\.\w+\("
# Search for keystore usage patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'keystore.$$$'
Length of output: 659
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for accountKeys usage in the codebase with more context
rg -B 3 -A 3 "accountKeys"
# Search for IndexOnly checks to see if they're properly handled
rg -B 3 -A 3 "IndexOnly"
# Look for requester initialization to see how accountKeys are used
ast-grep --pattern 'requester.New($$$)'
Length of output: 6802
Closes: #706
Description
Avoid asking the user values for flags such as:
coa-address
,coa-key
,coinbase
when they only use the EVM GW in
index-only
mode, which does not allow transactions.For contributor use:
master
branchFiles changed
in the Github PR explorerSummary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
IndexOnly
configuration, optimizing account retrieval and signer creation.Bug Fixes
Refactor
IndexOnly
flag.