Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test PGI compiler - part 2 #4623

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from
Closed

Test PGI compiler - part 2 #4623

wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

rhc54
Copy link
Contributor

@rhc54 rhc54 commented Dec 14, 2017

Just add new dstore code - no other changes

DO NOT MERGE THIS PR

Signed-off-by: Ralph Castain [email protected]

Just add new dstore code - no other changes

DO NOT MERGE THIS PR

Signed-off-by: Ralph Castain <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ralph Castain <[email protected]>
@open-mpi open-mpi deleted a comment from ibm-ompi Dec 14, 2017
@open-mpi open-mpi deleted a comment from ibm-ompi Dec 14, 2017
@open-mpi open-mpi deleted a comment from ibm-ompi Dec 14, 2017
@open-mpi open-mpi deleted a comment from ibm-ompi Dec 14, 2017
@open-mpi open-mpi deleted a comment from ibm-ompi Dec 14, 2017
@open-mpi open-mpi deleted a comment from ibm-ompi Dec 14, 2017
@open-mpi open-mpi deleted a comment from ibm-ompi Dec 14, 2017
@rhc54
Copy link
Contributor Author

rhc54 commented Dec 14, 2017

This is compiling - the error is being hit deep into the oshmem layer and is due to "no space left on device". Looks like the disk is overflowing.

@jjhursey @gpaulsen Can someone address that problem?

@rhc54
Copy link
Contributor Author

rhc54 commented Dec 14, 2017

@gpaulsen cleared the disks, so let's complete the verification. I'll then push a commit into @karasevb's pmix PR to complete the repair.

bot:ibm:retest

@open-mpi open-mpi deleted a comment from ibm-ompi Dec 14, 2017
@open-mpi open-mpi deleted a comment from ibm-ompi Dec 14, 2017
@open-mpi open-mpi deleted a comment from ibm-ompi Dec 14, 2017
@open-mpi open-mpi deleted a comment from ibm-ompi Dec 14, 2017
@rhc54
Copy link
Contributor Author

rhc54 commented Dec 14, 2017

@hjelmn I'm not sure I have the attribute test for __extension__correct - could you please take a gander? It's in the pmix_check_attributes.m4 file.

__extension__ attribute

Signed-off-by: Ralph Castain <[email protected]>
@gpaulsen
Copy link
Member

Ralph, so why was adding the check for the extension attribute configury not enough? Is it because these code changes REQUIRED extension attribute, and it was easier to revert than to implement both sides?

@rhc54
Copy link
Contributor Author

rhc54 commented Dec 14, 2017

I'm not sure what you are asking - the revert is required because the function pointer code isn't acceptable to PGI. The extension configury is desirable because the code otherwise always has the attribute, even if the compiler didn't support it.

@rhc54
Copy link
Contributor Author

rhc54 commented Dec 18, 2017

Test complete - can reproduce any time.

@rhc54 rhc54 closed this Dec 18, 2017
@rhc54 rhc54 deleted the topic/pgi2 branch December 18, 2017 03:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants