-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 245
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SIG documents should be owned by an OpenTelemetry account #1147
Comments
The following documents, unless checked off, are owned by contributors and not owned by the opentelemetry account:
If you own a SIG document, please transfer ownership to [email protected] and make a comment here so that your transfer can be accepted by a governance member. Process to transfer ownership
Unanswered questions
|
The solution is probably to copy it to [email protected] (can be done by someone who is able to login using that account). |
I am able to log into that account. The meeting notes link will change though. I suspect this will happen with many documents owned by organization accounts and not personal accounts |
Created a new log sig doc at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1P_wkLEomswd0M0eNNnxSOe6U-EOpCZaMIIxKuM4frw8 @tigrannajaryan can you confirm that it looks correct? I'll make a PR and will update the calendar when it gets merged |
@dyladan yes, looks good, thank you. |
@dyladan I have a similar problem with these docs. Can you please make copies of these 2 too? |
On it eBPF: https://docs.google.com/document/d/13GK915hdDQ9sUYzUIWi4pOfJK68EE935ugutUgL3yOw |
@tigrannajaryan see above PRs. I have not yet updated the calendars because I think we should do that when the PR merges so everything is consistent |
I just sent a transfer request for the Archived Java meeting notes doc, which I owned b/c we made a copy when rolling over due to size, in order to preserve the original doc links. |
I sent transfer request for 4 documents I owned. lmk if I missed anything |
I sent an ownership transfer request for the End User Workgroup Notes. Thanks! I missed this issue; for unrelated reasons I recently copied the SIG notes to a new location and am waiting for my PR with the new updated link to get merged. RE: #1191 For reference the prior End User WG notes are here and the new document is here. |
Thanks Sharr. I'm sure you missed the issue because I didn't tag you as I didn't know your github username. Thanks for following up. |
I sent an ownership transfer for the Swift SIG meeting notes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LugL8r4bAkbTxZ1Gq_6j_8SDv1LuZaNeUdR-QLN4d48/edit# |
Completely missed this notification, my apologies. Sent an ownership transfer request for the PHP documentation. |
Mainframe document ownership transferred |
@dyladan I completely missed the initial notification for this issue. I hitting the same issue reported by Tigran - I guess it needs the creation of a new document. Could you please take care of that? This is for this doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XedN2D8_PH4YLej-maT8sp4RKogfuhFpccRi3QpUcoI/edit?usp=sharing |
@pjanotti here's a new copy under the GC account: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dYdwRQVE3zu0vlp_lqGctNm0dCQUkDo2LfScUJzpuT8/edit?usp=sharing |
Thanks @trask @dyladan you can mark .NET: Automatic Instrumentation Doc owned by @pjanotti as done. |
I've transferred the comms SIG notes and checked off the box above |
Also completed for client instrumentation. Thanks for tracking these and making the process so easy @dyladan! |
Fixed for Ruby |
Related #1146
All SIG meeting note documents should be owned by an OpenTelemetry or CNCF google account. This will prevent access issues like we have seen before in the related issue. This has also happened in the past when OTel members have changed employers.
There should also be a defined ownership/administrative permission structure in order to handle instances of abuse, spam, or other issues with the docs. For example, it would be desirable for maintainers to have sufficient permission to change a document to a read-only state or to roll back to a previous history version.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: