libcontainer: remove aliases for deprecated functions #2999
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
These were deprecated and moved; the stubs were included in the last two (rc94, rc95) releases, so external consumers would have the chance to update their code. Removing this so that this doesn't get into v1.0.0 GA Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <[email protected]>
These were deprecated and moved; the stubs were included in the last two (rc94, rc95) releases, so external consumers would have the chance to update their code. Removing this so that this doesn't get into v1.0.0 GA Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <[email protected]>
|
@kolyshkin @AkihiroSuda ptal |
AkihiroSuda
approved these changes
Jun 4, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
These were deprecated and moved; the stubs were included in (at least) the last two (rc94, rc95) releases, so external consumers would have the chance to update their code.
Removing this so that this doesn't get into v1.0.0 GA
Proposed changelog entry (by @kolyshkin)
(goes to "Breaking changes" section)